Documents

Oral argument — Setrakyan v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2006

So the question of where the wife was at the time is not one that is up in the air, it is one on which petitioner testified. There are two issues here. … And there is, it's been investigated fulsomely by NGOs and by the international press, and the State Department even comments on it in their, in the country report, and yet there is no corroboration of

Oral argument — Abelardo Saucedo v. Farmland Management Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

In that case, the Clean Water Act, you don't look to lenity because the criminal provisions of that statute were not at issue. I don't see how you could tease them out quite so easily. … So they only get damages for one year period. That's correct. The reason there should be separate damages for each year are two fold.

Oral argument — United States v. Kamaldoss

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2025

And again, I think the clean bright line rule that Riley advanced a preference for would apply to digital data. … Another comment I just wanted to make was counsel indicated that the search warrant application here itself was candid.

Oral argument — Yale New Haven Hospital v. Azar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

Are you saying that the statute precludes judicial review of that because of the non-compliance with the notice and comment period? … period then?

Oral argument — Legendre v. Harrah's Casino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2025

place of business in Nevada and you don't dispute that is that correct I don't have any information to dispute that no and we would just ask that you again we would ask that you find that the trial court aired … as I'm sure all three of us did and he looked left for what seemed to me to be an extended period of time if your head's on a swivel you're kind of looking like this and then in that open area people

Oral argument — Fogliav.Renal Ventures

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013

Then says the inventory of log sheets maintained for this period show that 50 would be used if the defendants were following clinical guidelines for not using unused portions. … There were other pieces of their False Claims Act claim that they're not on appeal.

Oral argument — Stallworth v. Joshi, Nnebe v.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2019

the factors, Judge Sullivan came up with a whole list of categories of evidence that might establish or bear on whether somebody was dangerous or not, whether they received a DAT, whether they had a clean … It's only during that one small period. Which is fairly long. Sorry. Which does turn out to be fairly long, at least.

Oral argument — Odraye Jones v. Margaret Bradshaw

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2020

He committed the same air of science with Mr. Akbar. He told the jury that Mr. Akbar had been diagnosed before 15. And it's clear from Mr. … The period was on account of his race, period. I've mentioned Skipper. I've mentioned Sibbins. I've mentioned Darden B. Wainwright out of Florida.

Oral argument — Francine Shulman v. Todd Kaplan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

believe that the unclean hands, that they're coming to court with unclean hands, says that if they want to get profits out of an illegal business operation and use racketeering, they should be coming with clean … It just doesn't make any sense to me, unless you can convince me otherwise, that RICO, when they used the words business or property, intended to include what they then considered in that time period a

Oral argument — Doe v. Hastert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2019

Even then, if you apply both of those doctrines to total the discovery period, you would also, in order to reverse Judge Comer, need to find that from May 28, 2015 to May 26, 2017, the plaintiff acted … Ewingson's comments or threats. The only thing that is alleged is that on information in the brief, those comments were made on his behalf.

Oral argument — Steve Gallion v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2019

It was a Hatch Act-type restriction to the party at issue. And the party was saying, well, what if I had a bumper sticker or what if I had a button? … I referenced to the government the severability provision, which we did not really discuss directly, and I'd appreciate it if you'd comment on that. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — People v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2010

Certainly that's different than saying, well, maybe that was air. It wasn't abusive discretion. … Counsel, can you comment on one point? Your opposing counsel raised an interesting argument.

Oral argument — In Re: American Express Anti-Steering

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

Clayton Act. … and the Clayton Act.

Oral argument — Stewart v. Gruber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

They acted like the scheduling order deadlines did not exist, did not apply to them. … And then it was amended and amended and amended, all within the discovery period.

Oral argument — In re S.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

s private part, performed an act of oral sex on K.B., and performed an act of anal sex. And then at some point during this discussion, that changed. There wasn't an act of anal sex. … He said at the fairgrounds, by where the animals are, that O.M. had touched him, performed an act of oral sex, and performed an act of anal sex.

Oral argument — Boehringer Ingelheim v. Barr Labs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2009

The first issue in this case, the terminal disclaimer issue, is sui generis to a Hatch-Waxman Patent Act infringement case where you have a terminal disclaimer filed against a reference patent that has … This is a very clean prosecution in that we have 10 groups. Mylan, again, in the notice letter, never saw a double patenting problem. We never saw a double patenting problem.

Oral argument — Eng v. Steve Cooley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2008

Our position, Your Honor, is that those comments are comments that do not entitle to First Amendment protection under our city analysis. … It is very much one of the retaliatory acts we complain about.

Oral argument — Sylvester Wince v. Joe Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

The above could reasonably be interpreted by a jury to reach the inference about whether or not defendants acted with a discriminatory intent with regard to plaintiff's adverse actions. … back, kind of in the spirit of Ortiz, and we try to look at this evidence as a whole, there's some very troubling information in this record, whether it's these slurs on the lunchbox, or whether it's comments

Oral argument — Michael Elliott v. BNSF Railway Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

And, and again, I mean, the jury heard the Court say several times, both in excluding the transcripts and, and, and these other comments that it made that, well, we're, he's going to conflate the two. … This is different from Title VII, the Air 21 statutes, the FMLA, and ERISA, where reinstatement is explicitly denoted under the statutory language as equitable.

Oral argument — Jane Doe v. City of Detroit MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2021

Doe the day after her story aired on the local news. … Hughley at Doe after this, you threw me under the bus comment. And it ignored the temporal proximity between Ms. Doe's protected activity, which continued through into July 2017.