Documents

Oral argument — Contreras v. McCarthy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

They were there for a brief period of time. Nobody was hurt. They went there. And by the way, this is a fact that I think is important. … So you would point to the comment that Contreras made at the beginning. Not just the comment. Sorry, I left out what I believe is a crucial point. It's not just the comment.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Walden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2015

The judge indicated that he had read our written motions, and he made that comment, which, as you know, did not provide any further clarification. … An issue has been raised on appeal that the court aired by refusing to reduce Scott's child support obligation following his unemployment.

Oral argument — North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2025

for further comments can you describe to me how long that period was how many comments came in give me some detail on that if you can and i and i don't want to uh mystique i may have been referring to … period and the comment period is a more informed and and thoughtful process which allows for backing it up with scientific evidence uh and that is just simply not the case when you have an after effect

Oral argument — ITC Textile v. Wal-Mart Stores

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2015

We've cited numerous cases under the 1909 Act and the current Act that says that's how you treat the presumption. I would say that the evidence here doesn't even challenge the presumption. Right. … It's just in the air. It's talk in the air. There's no specific anything. There's no reference to anything specific. And that is crucially important.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Boyar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2012

in applying the doctrine of election The reason they aired is because a doctrine of election is based on equity What's fair in addressing an issue dealing with? … highlighted the reasons that the expansion of this doctrine to trust is necessary I believe it will aid the trial courts in the in the orderly and expeditious administration of trusts and I conclude with the comment

Oral argument — Frank William Bonan, II v. FDIC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2025

It's not compelled by an act of Congress or by regulation. … And that allows OSHA to enforce regulations dealing with a case that was not known at all at common law, and that is negligence in the air, right?

Oral argument — Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2015

to act, and then it's placing its name on the license plate. … My view is that it is a much more difficult case for us if the legislature passes a statute, because that is a legislative act and a clear act of the State. Well, what's the difference then?

Oral argument — Lee v. Lampert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2011

But I think if you have, of course, tolling during that period of time where the case is in state post-conviction court. … He's coming to you with pretty clean hands.

Oral argument — Zimmer Radio of Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

That's the beginning of the Act, the preamble, adopted by Congress as the purpose of the Act. Yeah, yes, yes. It says promote competition. Yes, Judge Benton. … And the record contained plenty of evidence, comments from small station owners themselves, who vehemently objected to further consolidation.

Oral argument — Ralph Holmes v. Salvador Godinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2021

May it please the court, I'm Assistant Attorney General Priyanka Gupta, and I represent the Defendant's Appellant, the Acting Director of the Department of Corrections. … And once we do the referral, our hands are clean. We're washed. We have no responsibility whatsoever. That's, you asked the question about both of you about whether what's their position.

Oral argument — O'Brien v. O'Brien

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2018

It's based upon the Partnership Act. But here's the important part. … Just by cleaning it, just by arguing 701, does not make it so. Now, you can agree that there's a partnership. That's imputed in fact.

Oral argument — FTC v. Charles Gugliuzza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2015

I understand the 50% does appear to be a little bit pulled out of the air there, but there was an expert that said, well, everyone would be confused, right? … There may be other types of consumer injury in the context of FTC Act cases.

Oral argument — Wayne D. Kubsch v. Ron Neal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2015

Obviously, we're under the more stringent standard here of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. Yeah. … even the prosecution saying that basically this crime for Rick and Aaron happened within five minutes, you know, he stabbed both of them, he shot both of them, you know, there was blood, he washed, he cleaned

Oral argument — National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2012

At a certain point, I just think that, you know, the better answer might be to say, we've struck the heart of this Act. Let's just give Congress a clean slate. … There are, to begin with, the Act authorizes annual enrollment periods, so people can't just show up at the hospital.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Navarro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2012

Obviously, it's the harmless air analysis. So I guess the two go together. I guess you may want to be sure I refine this a little bit. Arguendo. Yeah. … I guess my question is, if the defense acted improperly, maybe it's just plain old IAC kind of stuff. I don't know.

Oral argument — Clark Willes v. Linn County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

These acts by these law enforcement officers have a profound effect on that constitutional right. … I would disagree with the latter part of your honor's comments in terms of regard that and tell me how you deal with that phenomenon that this witness testified that your client told her to go out and

Oral argument — Robert F. Anderson v. Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

And in Wooden, it was a commitment under the Adam Walsh Act of a sex offender. And at trial, it was a more traditional battle of the experts. … It was apparently created by IBG and its Securities Council, and it was represented by DLA Piper throughout the period here for securities advice.

Oral argument — People v. Custer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2019

They would be air at a Krankel inquiry, and they would certainly support a decision to remand if that's what happened. … If I could briefly comment on forfeiture. The state argues that its claims were not forfeited under the case of Peeble v. Donahall. But in Peeble v.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Beazly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2022

I think the testimony is in the air on that one, but I don't know that he did. … Thank you, Mr airs I'd like for you to go next. Thank you, Judge. May it please the court.

Oral argument — Muyet v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024

This is core mitigating evidence that many judges, considering analogous motions, for example, under the First Step Act for Compassionate Release, or conducting Davis resentencings, have looked to in deciding … Muyad, after 30 years in federal prison, some meaningful prospect at breathing free air at some time in his life. We're not saying that Judge Preska has to do that.