Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.67s
Oral argument — United States v. Kamaldoss
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2025
And again, I think the clean bright line rule that Riley advanced a preference for would apply to digital data. … Another comment I just wanted to make was counsel indicated that the search warrant application here itself was candid.
43 min of audioOral argument — Tonya Helman v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2010
Well, we all agree that DOSHA applies to acts on the high seas. What the high seas meant, everybody agrees, has been unclear. … I'm trying to respond to their comment that there can't be a State remedy.
31 min of audioOral argument — Charles Schwab v. Chandler
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008
I think the second issue is a more direct, cleaner, and dispositive way to handle this case, so I want to focus my comments on what the IRA rights are. … So we're going to be writing on a clean slate about these definitions because whether it's a defined or contributory plan, it's in the language of the statute of the regs and we've got to deal with that
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Saab
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2025
Again, Your Honor, well, I would encourage the court, right, if the jury accredited every single piece of testimony that the government introduced, presumably they would have had a clean sweep here as … We can't act as if the government presented such overwhelming evidence that the jury was swept away and enamored with this case. It clearly wasn't.
50 min of audioOral argument — People v. Peterson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2016
And perhaps there's no other case that is in this posture, given this very short period of time that we're talking about. … He has invented, out of thin air, this notion that the state has to specify what testimony it is acting to prevent, that defendant is acting to prevent.
49 min of audioOral argument — Encompass Off Solutions, Inc. v. Louisiana Hlth Sv
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018
I mean, if I call somebody, you know, if an air conditioner fellow has done repairs at my house and I don't think the repairs are good, and then I try to call him two or three times and he doesn't answer … If the one-year prescriptive period runs from the date of the letter or three days later when Encompass knew of it, then that same prescriptive period equally applies to the defamation claim.
42 min of audioOral argument — Puletasi v. Wills
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2008
Barbee's, I think, picked out of the air standard, we've met that. And then an important question of fact here, an important issue of fact, in the assertion by counsel that Dr. … The very proposal of the lower-level job is an act of harassment, an illegal act in itself. And more letters from the doctor saying that the doctor thinks he can do – Mr.
40 min of audioOral argument — Munar v. Mukasey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007
Section 242 of the Immigration Nationality Act provides that this is a review before this court on the record. … But he wasn't in the country when the acts that he's charged with were committed. Wait, counsel. He was not in the country when the acts he's charged with were committed.
26 min of audioOral argument — Berkeley County School Dist. v. HUB International Limited
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019
Under the Atkins decision, the party moving to compel arbitration has the burden, period. Not the district. … If a judge or a jury decides facts, we have to accept them or we give them clear air review or whatever they're standards for. But just that you stand up in court and say something.
41 min of audioOral argument — Ramirez-Lopez v. Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022
Let me add to Judge Lynch's comment. Even in a criminal case, I was a district judge, and in criminal cases, I can't tell the defendant what to do or what to bring. So I echo Judge Lynch's comments. … That evidence did not exist, and it was air for the judge to request that evidence given the record and the testimony by the client that she did not tell anyone about her rape other than her aunt.
31 min of audioOral argument — Morgan v. Warden Butler Cty Prison
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2022
Morgan continued his appeal of the resentencing claim, there's language in the transcript that suggests that instead of just the two IDSI counts, everything else is sort of up in the air in terms of resentencing … I'd really just like to address a comment that my colleague made during his argument.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bryan Coffman 12-5611 USA v. Gary Milby
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2013
For purposes of today's oral argument, I have four issues which I have prepared comments on for your honors. … And again, a long period of time passed before we ever had an opportunity to even review them.
71 min of audioOral argument — Protect Our Communities v. Michael Black
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018
It was put out for public comment, though, correct? It was put out for a very brief 30-day public comment period. It was not ever intended to be a NEPA document prepared by EIA. … And for a comment to be timely, again, under this Court's case law, the comments must come during the public comment period on the draft EIS.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. McKinney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2020
The district court aired in this case when it held that Mr. … Period. It seems to me at that juncture, the question of whether it means anything else is going to be hashed out below. Sure. Now, does that sound like a reasonable disposition to you?
36 min of audioOral argument — Truth In Bible Club v. Kent School District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2006
And we have a situation before the court where the ASB counsel, over a period of time, considered this club and its various permutations at least six times and voted on it three times and turned it down … on that point, that there are either charters or constitutions that set forth some sort of mission statement or criteria that says what the purposes are and that we want people who want to believe in cleaning
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. McFadden
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024
This is an enhancement that punishes using your influence to get a minor to go along with a sex act. … I think the whole notion of voluntariness here, the question is really, did the child engage in a sex act when they're sort of passively submitting to that sex act?
31 min of audioOral argument — In Re Pet Food Products Part1
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2010
And I would say that's an important thing for the Court, as all courts acknowledge, is acting as a fiduciary in approval of these settlements. … And, you know, $250,000 is just out of thin air. And it has to be based on something. It has to be – and it can't just be – at the time they negotiated, there was no claims information.
73 min of audioOral argument — Bryant v. The Lakelands Community Homeowners Association, Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2011
In the Cablefish case, the statute that was at issue was the Service Animal Act and whether or not a child could use a service dog in a school. … So I don't pretend to put on air. At this point, I don't foresee me having any additional testimony or witnesses than I've already got. And briefly, I'll finish up. Mr.
37 min of audioOral argument — Jeffery Moore v. Equitrans, L.P.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2021
Honestly and this was the subject of our first appeal I didn't think Equitrans had the power to use the Natural Gas Act to condemn because they already had a right away and so I didn't think they had any … I've got I've got three other assignments of air that I want to touch on briefly if I may. I see that my time has expired.
48 min of audioOral argument — Arandell Corp. v. CenterPoint Energy Servs., Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2018
, which is very similar to the Wisconsin Antitrust Act, because a 100% owned subsidiary must share the purpose of its parent when the parent commits anti-competitive acts under Section 1. … Under Wisconsin law, knowledge and an act in furtherance is sufficient to establish antitrust liability.
66 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.