Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Daronnie Thompkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2020

Hey, this wasn't this wasn't compulsory at all It wasn't that kind of a cop that kind of a comment Do I owe deference to that? … So that when Iris let sessions into the vault room She wouldn't just be bringing a friend into the vault room and handing in the money She would be acting under duress and therefore the gun was for Iris's

Oral argument — People v. Simons

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2018

But a lot of my comments cross over between both. To begin with, of course it is not the function of this court to retry Mr. Simons and reweigh all the evidence, and Mr. … And despite it being a hot summer day, the record affirmatively shows that defendant's room was air conditioned. So it's unclear why any of the clothing was removed.

Oral argument — Mason Henry v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

I read that comment pretty carefully because that was one which I thought was pretty important. … Did he walk, talk, act like an Indian? Indian blood is not sufficient.

Oral argument — American Federation of State, County and Municipal v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2025

But to append to Judge Lynch's comment, the Supreme Court in this case has already said the stay stays in place regardless. … or in the violation of the Social Security Act.

Oral argument — US Chamber of Commerce v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2023

-day comment periods. … The first on the comment period, Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2024

I wasn't sure if you were nodding in the air or just moving your head. Nodding asleep. This is a nerve-wracking process. Thank you, Your Honor. Mr. Rogers. Thank you, Your Honor. … I think the underpinning of the Fourth Amendment is that the government is immediately suspect, and with the urinalysis thing, I just want to make the last comment.

Oral argument — Munar v. Keisler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

Section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that this is a review before this court on the record. … But he wasn't in the country when the acts that he's charged with were committed. Wait. Counsel. Yes, Your Honor. He was not in the country when the acts he's charged with were committed.

Oral argument — San Jose Christian College v. City of Morgan Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2003

One comment the council made was was factually incorrect. Although this is if I understand this. … So is the air. So is that. So is water. And so I'm not sure that CEQA is land use regulation.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Segal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2019

I believe it involved a turnover order under the Victim Restitution Act. Correct. … And during that period, because Mr.

Oral argument — Nelson v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2021

No, it would be under any federal common law period. Well, well, that's sort of. Well, the period there breaks down the parallels. … Nelson was grievously injured on academic property, Air Force Academy property. He brought a claim under the Colorado Premises Liability Act.

Oral argument — Gilbane Federal v. United Infrastructure Projects

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019

They just have to perform the act. And that's why I said that. And if I perform the act, what do you mean? I mean, to look at all the delays and see what caused them and see who's responsible. … In page 62 of its brief, it says UIP does not challenge that the project delay period from the subcontracts execution on January 21, 2014 to March 7, 2014 is entirely attributable to UIP.

Oral argument — SELPA CONSTRUCTION V USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2012

So there wasn't any time period here showing coercion and then some effect of that coercion by entering into these modifications. They occurred before the first alleged coercive act. … I think at this point, this court has an opportunity to expand the appreciation of what it means for the government to act in bad faith.

Oral argument — California Pro-Life Council v.Randolph 05-15507

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2007

Number two is that they cannot terminate, well, they have to file periodic reports. … These things don't fly out of the air. That's right, and that's why it's important that we have disclosure, so that people know who is behind these ballot measures.

Oral argument — Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2015

to act, and then it's placing its name on the license plate. … My view is that it is a much more difficult case for us if the legislature passes a statute, because that is a legislative act and a clear act of the State. Well, what's the difference then?

Oral argument — Lee v. Lampert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2011

But I think if you have, of course, tolling during that period of time where the case is in state post-conviction court. … He's coming to you with pretty clean hands.

Oral argument — Mike Yoder v. Scott Bowen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

Because these drones fly 400 feet in the air, they're not what you would normally see in hunting grounds a DNR official could easily see what was going on there and approach the person that was using that … It's the act of enhancing your senses. So the same way, Your Honor, where if you were flying in an airplane above the area with binoculars, that's an unfair advantage over these deer.

Oral argument — DSPT International v. Nahum

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2009

It was simply an explanation to them of how they could make the calculation based on what they believed was the relevant time period. … He doesn't like the result, but as to each and every one of the factors under the Anti-Cyberspotting Act, there was evidence in the record to support what the jury found. Thank you.

Oral argument — Lexington Insurance Company v. Precision Drilling Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2019

And the first problem is that what the district court's decision does is create coverage out of thin air. … upstream, its subsidiaries, affiliated and related companies, their working interest owners, co-lessees, co-owners, contractors and subcontractors, and any others for whom any of the foregoing may be acting

Oral argument — Zimmer Radio of Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

That's the beginning of the Act, the preamble, adopted by Congress as the purpose of the Act. Yeah, yes, yes. It says promote competition. Yes, Judge Benton. … And the record contained plenty of evidence, comments from small station owners themselves, who vehemently objected to further consolidation.

Oral argument — Carl Knight v. Kathy Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

But unlike the cases, such as Davis, where offensive comments were commensurate in time with adverse acts, that didn't happen here with June Willard. As much as Mr. … The water cooler acts comment, that related to the informal meetings that Willard admitted he had with the senior managers. And the district court's holding is correct.