Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Oral argument — State of Alabama v. U.S. Secretary of Education
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 18, 2024
And then there's pages of analysis about the Public Health Service Act. … I would observe that the ramp-up or the compliance period in this rule was broadly comparable to the period with, you know, in the 2020 rule.
61 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Robert Williams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2014
Now, that was obviously a foolish act. Kennedy. … And he made comments about he knew he represented himself at trial.
25 min of audioOral argument — Kirk SaintCalle v. Jeffrey Uttecht
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2019
in order to sustain a Batson challenge and its explanation of why 40 cases before it had never sustained an appellate Batson challenge, that it required a judge to make a finding that the attorney was acting … was not properly raised, they're not going to do anything — they say, we apply Batson to this case and conclude that the trial court's finding that there was no purposeful discrimination was not clear air
27 min of audioOral argument — Salehian v. Nevada State Treasurer's Office
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2024
What is the, is it the comments that they made to her, one quoted by Judge Bea? What is your best evidence? … There's no less than 11 either comments or actions that were taken that arguably were harassing her because of her age.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Michael Bonin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019
They hauled the bags in the air and cut them open, waving them around before the jury. It was a spectacle that the jury couldn't possibly ignore, even with a curative instruction. … I want to first address counsel's first comment about this statute criminalizing Halloween, theater, or five-year-olds pretending to be law enforcement. It is clearly not the case.
32 min of audioOral argument — Teva Pharma v. Novartis Pharma
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2006
FISA, Teva was not the first filer under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Teva was in line to the first filer who, under the statute, had a 180-day period of exclusivity once they launched. … It's all up in the air now, isn't it?
33 min of audioOral argument — People v. Johnson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020
The state makes one comment and says, oh, he's been paid $20,000 and he didn't look at any of the material. That's the sum and substance of that analysis. … Without a prejudicial versus probative analysis, it's clear air and an injected bias into this trial. Thank you, counsel. May it please the Court? Counsel.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. John Nance
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2010
So I don't have a very clean answer for the court on whether or not... Okay. … Well, I disagree with that last comment, Your Honor. I think that particularly when we're talking about people like Mr.
65 min of audioOral argument — Bax Global Inc. v. The Nissan Fire &
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2008
Right, that the damage occurred during the period of time governed by the Warsaw Convention. … I'm going to start with the attorney fee issue, given the comments from Judge Fletcher as to the treaty issue.
45 min of audioOral argument — Lester Ochoa v. Ron Davis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021
The court held that it was air to exclude evidence that he would adjust well in the jail. And it was prejudicial because the district attorney made the argument against that. … There was a temporary period where victim impact testimony was out, and this case was tried in that window, wasn't it, or am I wrong on that? This case was tried in 1988? I think that's right.
50 min of audioOral argument — Manuel Moreno v. Carol Bosholm
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2025
I think those were aired out in the earlier hearing, and we really just want to hear from you about this one issue that has gotten us tied in knots, and hopefully you'll be able to help us with that. … Under the federal claim, the federal rules of evidence apply, period. There's no question that Dr. Bilbrow is competent under the federal rules.
51 min of audioOral argument — Tom Stull v. Michael Fox
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2012
Well, I think the intent is quite up in the air, frankly. This is a messy record. Well, it's – as far as interest goes, I don't know how messy it is. … But that's not what the parties said, and that's not the way they acted. So whether this was the fairest kind of a deal – You're running out of time. Okay.
28 min of audioOral argument — HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2013
My comment in rebuttal to that was that they should have full review, but that's for Congress. That's not for us today. … In other words, what was the, before the Veterans Judicial Review Act, what remedy, what tools did this seriously burned veteran have in his toolbox?
24 min of audioOral argument — Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2022
This case was brought under the Administrative Procedure Act, and under the State Farm Standard, if the agency overlooks a significant issue, then it's acted arbitrary and capriciously. … well, if I understand their argument, they are concerned that the very minor activities contemplated by this EAS will entrain, will kick up essentially dust, and that dust will entrain itself into the air
31 min of audioOral argument — United States Telecom Assoc. v. FCC - Issue I
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2015
Does the commission get the right of that interaction list to prevail in the air connection issue? We do not. … We never commented on that. We never commented on that because we never heard of it.
82 min of audioOral argument — Illinois State Treasurer v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2012
This is with the injured workers benefit fund is a remedial aspect of the remedial act of the workers compensation plan. … Any comment? And if you haven't read them, I'm sure it would be kind of difficult.
32 min of audioOral argument — Stephanie Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Exa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2010
And she commented at the time, the electronic text wasn't available. So all of my textbooks were in an audio cassette format. … She had asked her dean to include that in the application to the bar examiners but then said, no, let's take that out because my lawyers want to keep the record clean.
33 min of audioOral argument — Adrian Scott v. Maryland State Dept. of Labor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2016
Your Honor, I believe there are racial comments that were made, other than the fact that Ms. … appearance for him, the time for service of process, the 120 days, arrived And I was in a position to only be able to prepare the opposition to the motion to dismiss With the intention, Your Honor, of cleaning
39 min of audioOral argument — Whitaker v. On The Right Track Systems, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023
That's just out of thin air, as opposed to payment of both the 7% royalties and the minimum royalties. So, their whole theory is that there's this oral agreement which explains why they paid the 7%. … Are you saying that he was not demoted beyond the limitations period?
101 min of audioOral argument — In Re: American Express Anti-Steering
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020
Clayton Act. … and the Clayton Act.
26 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.