Documents

Oral argument — State of California v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2020

Are you suggesting that that's one of the equitable factors, the clean air? Certainly. Go ahead. … No, you think that the Clean Air Act's seeking to mitigate pollution, that's a factor that district court should consider under Rule 60B on whether or not to reconsider?

Oral argument — United States v. Max Spatig

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017

General intent simply requires a volitional act, where specific intent requires something more. … It's that the defendant acted for a specific purpose, and there was no requirement in this statute that the defendant had to intend any result from his act of storing or disposing of the hazardous waste

Oral argument — Kathryn Spletstoser v. John Hyten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2022

The Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson testified that as a result of the investigation he was falsely accused. … So in the Lutz decision, we had, again, against the Air Force. We had an Air Force complaint. I know the facts of the Lutz case, but I'm asking you why.

Oral argument — U.S. ex rel. David Grant v. United Airlines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2018

But those are very general comments. What I'm looking for is what I think Rule 9 requires, which is specific. … So we believe that Discovery, we believe that we have very specific periods of time like that four-month period where there's no question that the repairs violated the regulations, Air Force orders actually

Oral argument — Barbre v. Barbre

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

That triggers the discretionary provisions under the act which they cited being 511A. … Barbary filed for petition to modify shortly after the two-year period ran, which has to do with some child custody issues.

Oral argument — Sab Construction v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2006

This case arose at Nellis Air Force Base. It involved the renovation of visiting airman's quarters in 1999. … I'm just talking of the additional work you incurred in cleaning the condition up. Let me put that in a very precise time perspective.

Oral argument — Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2018

trash, rolling silverware, scrubbing walls, sweeping floors, restocking tuque oak supplies, cleaning booths, cleaning ramekins, and cleaning restrooms. … I don't think I'd want my waitress cleaning the bathrooms. I don't even want mine checking to see that the bathroom has been cleaned.

Oral argument — Rebecca Towers v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

The lower court aired when it made ultimate findings of fact as to foreseeability and as to reasonableness, both which this court has repeatedly held are questions of fact to be determined after discovery … And then, of course, the most important thing is because this was a criminal act by a guest, it's an intervening act under the law, they have to anticipate that because this person is intoxicated, that

Oral argument — Wells v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

There are several issues in this appeal, but the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act makes it the simplest to resolve. … Okay, so on the facts of that case, I don't know what time period Eddie encompassed.

Oral argument — 1-19-0317

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2020

We never had a hearing on one comment. So now, as Mr. Chief said, I'm not anxious to continue to go through this case forever. … And the state never moved to enjoin further dumping during that period, correct? So the dump went from ground level to 85 feet up in the air without the state ever moving to stop the dumping.

Oral argument — Michael Alexander v. Express Energy Svc Oprt, L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2015

He cleaned part of the vessel. He helped put down the gangplank. He put down the gangplank on every occasion is his testimony. … I'd just like to make a few other comments. There was mention of the Wilcox case here, where the district court found an issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff in Wilcox v.

Oral argument — Plastic-View Int'l Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

And during the time he was serving our country, he realized that there was too much glare on these air traffic control towers. … As part of cleaning house in 2012, we were asking our distributors to tell us where their products were ending up on glass, in other words, to give us their customer lists.

Oral argument — Harris Investment Holdings, LLC v. BFJ of USA, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

to it overlooked evidence the record and failed to View the evidence and give all inferences to the to the plaintiff as required as a non-moving party now circle it encourages private individuals to clean … property But then refused to consider that the declaration on the grounds that it was untimely in the factual Evanson supporters opinion And we'll come back to that in just a second now this court also air

Oral argument — Town of Harrietstown v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2026

If the pollution is in the ground, they're obligated to clean it up. … What happens if there is a single paper, as we're calling it, that says there is pollution from a particular chemical, period, and it's known that that chemical is used in dealing with air crashes, but

Oral argument — City of Port Isabel v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2024

During that comment period, it might receive new information, but that doesn't mean you then put out another comment period. You can just go and deal with the comments in the draft. … And then there was extensive comment opportunities. And it did its job. The models were revised in response to Sierra Club's comments. Sierra Club's comments, they came in after the 21-day period.

Oral argument — United States v. Rodney Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015

It's too clean. That's suspicious. … So if he's sweating profusely without knowing what his metabolism is, he's been in air conditioned car walks a few feet, gets in another air conditioned car.

Oral argument — People v. Ironhustler Excavating, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2022

He stated that not knowing the origin of the unclean construction material, Iron Hustler acted immediately anyway to clean up the site. … Iron Hustler acted quickly and swiftly because it wanted to see that the problem was cleaned up, regardless of who was responsible for it.

Oral argument — S Cal Alliance Treatment Works v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2016

Is that the only scenario in which SCAP can challenge EPA's interpretation of the Clean Water Act and its regulations? … Whether EPA has correctly interpreted the Clean Water Act and its regulations. At this point, in this context, no.

Oral argument — Badger Helicopters Inc. v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2025

that Air Tour Management Act is to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, which I'll refer to as NEPA, which affects the determination and the outcome of the air tour management plans that … period, and there were many comments raised on these issues in question, and the outcome of that is that the record doesn't show any discussion of why these sets of data were chosen, and that the lack

Oral argument — Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2017

And because I believe the law is on my side, I wasn't going to accuse my counsel of acting in bad faith. I disagree with them, but I don't think they were trying to lie to the Court. … Austin come in specifically on that day as they were cleaning the... Without the material that's apparently necessary to clean that kind of stuff up. Quickly anyway.