Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.39s
Oral argument — HENRICHS v. VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2006
So it's like suing the air, in effect. It's just there's nothing to sue. … But – and if you don't file your claim within the time period, either by the bar date or by the end of that statutory period, then no court can enter a judgment against you.
44 min of audioOral argument — Diag Human S.E. v. Czech Republic - Ministry of H
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018
I thought that this sentence actually referred to what the review panel itself was saying about a comment order. … The arbitration agreement itself was concluded under the Arbitration Act and specifically says that proceedings will be conducted pursuant to that Act.
73 min of audioOral argument — Pesticide Action Network v. USEPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2015
And the comment period closed when? The end of April. End of April. So now we're one month out. We'll have to obviously ask the EPA about this. … period on April 30th of this year, EPA has already done an initial look at the 900 or so comments and weeded out essentially which are the truly substantive comments that raise issues that EPA wants to
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gamba
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2003
The difference is he's sort of saying into the air in her presence, you know, I know people who have ratted Kathy out and they've wound up in a ditch. … Now, I really don't see how anyone can argue that those kind of comments are not threatening in nature and how they can not be intimidating, because anyone that would hear those comments should certainly
41 min of audioOral argument — People v. Macedo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2023
This is not a case where the trial court said, I'm going to keep this witness clean. I'm not going to allow any impeachment of him. … Counsel's response is that it was only his thoughts, he never acted on those thoughts. There's no proof that he ever acted on them. Well, the State never had a chance to cross-examine him on that.
47 min of audioOral argument — Stone v. Mitek Industries, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013
So at the October 6, 2011, post-trial hearing, the court commented on MITEC's stark position, and the court said, you don't give me much choice. … It worked, even though it might not be the most elegant solution that you might craft if you had a clean sheet of paper. It was their choice.
39 min of audioOral argument — Dina Abdurahman v. Prospect CCM C
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2021
So you've got an individual acting on behalf of the signatory, Prospect Health Access Network, that is controlling her obligations. … Lantus will have lots of work for himself for cleaning that up, right, that there's some work to be done on that. But we can't.
38 min of audioOral argument — James Lane v. John Anderson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016
He says, your comments were intended to derail an internal investigation about an important matter. … Under Title VII, under Title II of the ADA, under the Rehab Act, there's never any dispute there.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Zayas
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2023
Well, the trouble is there was no testimony about these other many acts of child abuse. … I mean, Annalisa was alive for a very limited period of time. Smoking, drinking, as it relates to that period of time, definitely.
37 min of audioOral argument — Dawson v. City of Seattle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2005
There are some others I'd like to hear you comment on, so we'll add three or four minutes to your time. Okay. I would be interested in your view. … If there is no municipal act, clearly there cannot be municipal liability. And plaintiffs have not submitted any evidence of a municipal act.
38 min of audioOral argument — Refugio Ruiz-Cortez v. Glenn Lewellen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 29, 2019
In fact, Hilliard, who was the acting head of the CPD at that time, actually said, oh, I didn't care, I let narcotics handle that. … The conviction itself is not based on findings of any particular acts that Llewellyn may or may not have committed in furtherance of the conspiracy.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hernandez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2025
I believe a lot of those examples are from plein air or where there's been no... Or even if preserved, there's been no further evidence presented at sentencing. … I did want to just point out also that it doesn't act. Should we opine? I'm sorry? Should we opine?
32 min of audioOral argument — Memphis A Phillip Randolph Institute v. Tre Hargett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2020
And on the merits, you cannot find that the district court plainly aired clear abuses discretion or clearly aired. … Indeed, they were required after this injunction to provide identification through the mail as the Help America Vote Act requires.
38 min of audioOral argument — Grange Mutual Casualty Company v. Damitra Baisden
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2019
It will always necessarily involve a slightly different time period. … Atkins said, let me try to clean this up.
42 min of audioOral argument — Jespersen v. Colony Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023
I think the only way that that would happen is sort of the Mooney case in New Hampshire where the insurance company goes after the insured who acts fraudulently or acts in some way, and they would be recovering … If I can just have one other comment here.
39 min of audioOral argument — California Pro-Life Council v.Randolph 05-15507
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2007
Number two is that they cannot terminate, well, they have to file periodic reports. … These things don't fly out of the air. That's right, and that's why it's important that we have disclosure, so that people know who is behind these ballot measures.
48 min of audioOral argument — Montanile v. Board of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2015
They monitor them carefully, either internally or through outside subrogation agents, and they act promptly. … When you say they act promptly, what do they act promptly to do? And is it always the case that they can act promptly enough? No.
60 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Luis Ceja
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2021
So you're not writing on a clean slate. But I think the good reason for it is here we have this. … Defendant was charged with multiple acts, and they're trying to say it should be one.
31 min of audioOral argument — Damian Stinnie v. Richard Holcomb
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022
Well, didn't the commissioner's letter asking the General Assembly, would you please act so we don't have to pay more attorney's fees in this litigation, tie the two things together? … It's a very clean rule. That may not be satisfying, but that is one virtue of having a bright line rule.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. California State Water Resources Control Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2026
So what the board did in 2018 is it changed the objective for the April through August time period from 0.7 to 1.0. … references again not only to reclamation but also to DWR was because of their history with respect to salinity in the Delta also the board is under a requirement under state law and to an extent the Clean
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.