Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Oral argument — Air Transport Assn of America v. Port of Seattle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2015
Well, I think, Your Honor, first of all, there'll be a period of time, 45 days, to implement. … It relates to whether this is a safe and secure property for the users of the property, that is, the people who are traveling on air traffic, the people who are working there.
32 min of audioOral argument — Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015
They just basically made the countries up out of thin air within a GNI ban that was never explained. … Which was only one of the many categories that were at issue in the period of review, right? It is one of the various categories, Your Honor.
41 min of audioOral argument — Riensche v. Cingular Wireless LL
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2009
You just want us to send it back, period? Right. I think that the basis for the judge's dismissal is that there was no deceptive act, prong number one under the Consumer Protection Act. … air at all in Washington.
44 min of audioOral argument — American Coal Company v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2018
Wirtz, I should comment, by the way. Yes. When you prepare an appendix, you should really review it first, because you only gave us two pages of the arbitrator's decision. … I just like to breathe the rarefied air. Yes. May it please the Court. Mr. Wirtz, my name is Bruce Wirtz, and I represent Jimmy Boatwright.
28 min of audioOral argument — Abdulrafi v. Lockyer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2006
The actual acts as charged, as admitted by the prosecutor in his closing, are minimal. The other act's evidence is very, very serious. … You heard counsel's comment that even though we don't second-guess strategy, the strategy has to be reasonable. What's your response? Well, Mr.
21 min of audioOral argument — LEADER TECH v. FACEBOOK
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2012
December 8th, that's two days before the critical date, within the time period when even under Mr. … The claim says a computer-implemented method of managing data comprising computer-executable acts. The key phrase, it seems to me, is computer-executable acts, which comes after the word comprising.
35 min of audioOral argument — Towery v. Ryan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2012
The court noted that when determining whether or not there is mitigation, the significant moment in time is the time at which the criminal acts are committed. … And Arizona courts have never given much weight to difficult childhoods when there's a significant time period between the crime and the defendant, the end of the defendant's childhood.
47 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. Stone
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2012
What it does establish, due to the way he acted and the way he walked and talked, he was definitely impaired. … And Judge Wexler indicated that it may have been air, but perhaps not reversible air. It is the whole issue of this lawsuit.
40 min of audioOral argument — Expo Properties, LLC v. Experient, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2020
You get a benefit in the fact that you can charge future additional tenants a whole lot more rent by virtue of that air conditioning system and the like. … That is merely confirmation of what has been happening for the entire 20-year period of the lease, whether the tenant was originally Galaxy, whether the tenant was Experient, or whether it was Experient
47 min of audioOral argument — Pajaro Dunes Rental Association v. Pajaro Dunes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2003
Isn't there a clean way of resolving this dilemma as to say that the homeowners association is entitled to the contract payments up to the date of termination plus the loss of use after that date? … If the governmental body never acted, then the governmental body is free to disavow any suggestion that they did.
55 min of audioOral argument — Tom Stull v. Michael Fox
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2012
Well, I think the intent is quite up in the air, frankly. This is a messy record. Well, it's – as far as interest goes, I don't know how messy it is. … But that's not what the parties said, and that's not the way they acted. So whether this was the fairest kind of a deal – You're running out of time. Okay.
28 min of audioOral argument — HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2013
My comment in rebuttal to that was that they should have full review, but that's for Congress. That's not for us today. … In other words, what was the, before the Veterans Judicial Review Act, what remedy, what tools did this seriously burned veteran have in his toolbox?
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. William McCray
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2014
And Lazarenko provided that in a money laundering charge, the commingling of tainted money with clean money taints the entire account. … But what about he made the comments about what credit he would get for money that he returned? Is there a difference?
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Es
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2019
And here we really have no connection between, although there's definitely a sense in the air that this person was a snitch or a rat, there's really no evidence that Mr. … Either physical deficit or unwillingness would be something in the direction of satisfying the comment to the guide doc, wouldn't it? I suppose if you could show...
48 min of audioOral argument — CAPIANCO v. HARTFORD LIFE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007
But is there any evidence at all with regard to exactly what his job path and what the company's relationships with each other were during this time period? … My main response is just going to be directly to some of the comments just made in the opposing argument.
41 min of audioOral argument — Richard Bays v. Warden Chillicothe Correction
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019
He is voluntarily, very calmly, the officers testified he was not acting nervous. He was acting calm. He is in his mid-20s. It was a short interview. He was not deprived of any food or water. … If I can just ask you, did Bay's offer the comments about the victim's wallet?
48 min of audioOral argument — Coinbase INC v. United States Securitiesand Exchange Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024
I mean, their best arguments, to put air quotes around that, are first, we don't have to make our rules workable. … And so, as I said, it's the SEC that has claimed that it has acted by rules.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. The Wilderness Socie
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2008
Those include FLIPMA, the Quiet Title Act, and other laws. … And I'm going to assume that they were done pursuant to federal environmental law with Clean Water Act Review, Endangered Species Act Review. Are you saying that the road is a done deal?
45 min of audioOral argument — Health Choice Alliance, L.L.C. v. Eli Lilly
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2020
in which the government has acted, in this case, arbitrarily and capriciously. … Do you have any comment on that? No, there is no violation of DOJ policies.
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rachel Lee Padgett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018
And during the 30-day period of which she would have had, if she had missed filing it within the 10-day period, she would have had an additional 30 days to ask the Court to do it out of time. … That was her own volitional act. Regarding the mental health, she did raise that, actually, at sentencing.
39 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.