Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Stacey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2004

And he should have been able to argue that the three that were left within the statute were innocuous acts and not acts of evasion at all. … With regard to the statute of limitations, defendants might have emphasized to the jury a closing argument that it was limited to considering overt acts committed during the statutory period, but the district

Oral argument — Toll Brothers, Inc. v. Lin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2011

That is, they have to act in good faith to satisfy the conditions and within a reasonable time. … As this Court is quite aware, this is a very, very complex transaction that was performed over a period of years.

Oral argument — People v. Treadwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2022

So, all of these acts similar. That's... Well, what I'm saying is, defendant became more... Defendant, in all of them, was acting like he was doing something non-sexual. … s testimony was, I tried to scream, but defendant had me in a chokehold, and I was losing air so I couldn't scream.

Oral argument — Kent v. Patel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2025

And confirmation that the finding would be acted upon, which was not done. … It's a lot of discovery to do in a short period of time.

Oral argument — People v. Nollman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

And the jury could just conclude that he's all hot air. So I'm not arguing that Mr. Nolman is innocent. I'm just saying he's got a plausible defense in this case. … Well, in the court in ruling, didn't the court express some concern about it's going to take some time to redact this 100-minute tape and I don't want to keep the jury waiting for a long period of time

Oral argument — Michael Hedlund v. The Educational Resources Inst

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2013

Hedlund acted in good faith. PHEAA's argument essentially is that good faith requires that Mr. … In any event, may I finish my comment? Yes. But be efficient. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Luis Hernandez-Meza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2013

But the parties now dispute two interim periods between the filing of the information and the start of trial. … So those two days on November 21st and 28th represented the first day of continuance periods.

Oral argument — Rapid Displays Inc. v. Gorder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2005

It's the point of the Fraudulent Transfer Act. At any point that you're running a company that's insolvent, you have these duties to act properly. … Gorter, Judy Walsh, acknowledged was received, but it vanished into thin air. The trial court's problem is that it didn't make proper findings of fact, and it missed. It missed the boat.

Oral argument — Thomas Maniscalco v. A. M. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2014

I'm asking you whether there's holding of the Supreme Court that the California Court acted contrary to. … As the court was mentioning, we have the first trial, and then, of course, after the first trial, there has to be a period for everybody to... Typically a period of weeks or months rather than years.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2015

And those comments are also important because he's talking about the history of the guidelines. He references the Crime Control Act. … With regard to the comments, she . . . Ms.

Oral argument — Richard Clemons v. John Couch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2020

So during this time period, this initial time period when Trooper Couch, Christina, and her mother-in-law entered the home, Trooper Couch described my client as being irritated, but not disorderly. … But a state trooper standing in the middle of Mr. couch's living room was supposed to be able to pull that out of thin air.

Oral argument — Jon Hyde v. City of Wilcox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2021

critical symptoms he rolls his head back according to the complaint three minutes later he takes his last breath at 829 that's the first time that staff notices that there's a medical problem and they act … We're dealing with a period of time where Prago tightens the straps at 815 and doesn't notice anything.

Oral argument — Standard Security Life Insuran v. FCE Benefit Administrators, In

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2020

That's what Section 6 of the Federal Arbitration Act says. … And when the umpire in an offhand comment during a witness examination used the phrase, Mr. Norzer pushed back on it and pushed back on that characterization.

Oral argument — CA Sportfishing Proct. Alliance v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2006

Can the Petitioners then appeal after the agency has sat on the petition for a period of time or petition for review here? … I think a couple of things I want to comment on.

Oral argument — In Re: John McFadden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016

If we act here, does that keep him from going to state court? No. No, Your Honor. No, it does not. So what does holding an abeyance do? Nothing. … So active incarceration was six if you kept your nose clean and then you got to go home. Well, Your Honor, that's exactly the point, if you kept your nose clean.

Oral argument — NLRB v. CNN America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2017

The case that it cited to is Capitol Cleaning, and holds that out as the precedent for you to follow. … As we have argued in our brief, Capitol Cleaning also doesn't apply here, and cannot apply and has never applied in a situation if you agree with our joint employer status.

Oral argument — Scott Schmidt v. Brian Foster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

He was not able to act as his client's assistant, advocate, counselor. … In Woods, you've accurately described why the absence for a short period of time allegedly didn't impact.

Oral argument — John Saad v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2017

So it's almost like a probationary period or something. Right. Did he ask for that in this case? I don't believe he has, Your Honor. … on to— when his office administrator found that there was a discrepancy, he went on to continue to submit his receipts for reimbursement and just remove the telltale receipt, and then he didn't come clean

Oral argument — Hubert Acevedo v. Alex de la Portilla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

And Carollo already establishes that the question is whether he was acting as a private citizen and whether or not his comments involved a matter of public concern. … But if we just, if we find that just some of his comments were protected First Amendment comments, then that's, that's all we really need to do to affirm the district court.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Goodin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2020

I would like to address, too, my colleague's comment about Mr. Gooden's trial attorney saying that he was indigent at sentencing. … And that comment was in regards to whether he needed appointed counsel for appeal.