Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.95s
Oral argument — John Doe v. University of Kentucky
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2017
Cox for the comment. We'll give counsel a moment to get settled. Good morning. The appellant has reserved three minutes for rebuttal, your honors. Thank you. May it please the court. … Really, if they wanted to clean this up and try to get younger abstention, why don't they go past the statute and say that their UK process has to be run under Chapter 13B of KRS?
31 min of audioOral argument — Detrich v. Navy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2007
At the end of that 16 year period he was terminated based on a notice of proposed removal and ultimately a decision that alleged eight charges of misconduct. … You can find it in Chalice during your rebuttal period. All right. But the deciding official clearly said that, and I'll find that on my rebuttal.
35 min of audioOral argument — Wyeth Holdings v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2010
In particular, Congress gave qualified patent owners the right to obtain a patent term extension equal to half the period of time spent during the testing of the new drug and during the entire period of … It's a cover letter, a table of contents, a summary, a copy of each complete letter, a complete facsimile labeling, the Freedom of Information Act summary, a complete identity of the applicant and what
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Duprece Jett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018
It's not like he knew him for a longer period of time. Right. … My other comment is about overwhelming evidence, which is something that I have to deal with every time I come up here and raise a trial issue.
56 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2017
They looked at it and they said Uniform Arbitration Act. … There was a piece of paper that said, okay, here's some issues with the heating and air conditioning system. That was in 2004, I believe is what the council called it.
41 min of audioOral argument — Hart v. Excel Emergency Care
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2014
This is just making stuff up out of thin air. … Well, I agree, but since we had so many comments about that, and, of course, that order was never appealed by the plaintiff.
47 min of audioOral argument — Tracy Sempowich v. Tactile Systems Technology
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2021
Resh, other than during the time period he was actively advocating for Semplewich's removal. That is the only time period during which such spreadsheets were created. Do we know when he created? … So you're talking about a very discrete time period during which these spreadsheets were being generated, which, according to Resh's testimony, is also the same time period during which he was actively
78 min of audioOral argument — Thomas Ostly v. City and County of San Francisco
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2024
So I'm sure there were other people that just — it was clean, said, hey, you're not my kind of DA, you're out of here. … Justice, as my time is up, may I make one comment about the affirmative defense? Sure.
46 min of audioOral argument — Tauno Waidla v. Ron Davis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024
And I would say that for the time period, it was extremely heinous. … And reinitiation can be an act.
58 min of audioOral argument — State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Michael LaRocca
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2025
And that was for a significant period of time, both before we brought our claims and prevailing afterwards. The record is replete with evidence that Dr. … We cite a number of examples in our brief that if they held a grand opening and they released 10 balloons into the air... Is it your argument that in all cases it only works piecemeal?
32 min of audioOral argument — Health Choice Alliance, L.L.C. v. Eli Lilly
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2020
in which the government has acted, in this case, arbitrarily and capriciously. … Do you have any comment on that? No, there is no violation of DOJ policies.
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Alexander Treisman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023
The issue is that when the officers decide to act, you have to look to see if the primary motivation is an impound and inventory under their code, or if they have a motivation to look for evidence of crime … But it was within a fairly short period of time.
36 min of audioOral argument — Mounia Elyazidi v. SunTrust Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2015
The Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act has an intent requirement. That is not in the Maryland Consumer Protection Act. … That's a number pulled out of thin air, and I have a hard time believing that it's 20 hours in every single case in which they file an affidavit. It's not.
42 min of audioOral argument — Montanile v. Board of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2015
They monitor them carefully, either internally or through outside subrogation agents, and they act promptly. … When you say they act promptly, what do they act promptly to do? And is it always the case that they can act promptly enough? No.
60 min of audioOral argument — John Saad v. SEC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2017
So it's almost like a probationary period or something. Right. Did he ask for that in this case? I don't believe he has, Your Honor. … on to— when his office administrator found that there was a discrepancy, he went on to continue to submit his receipts for reimbursement and just remove the telltale receipt, and then he didn't come clean
38 min of audioOral argument — Retirement Plans Comm. of IBM v. Jander
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2019
I saw it nowhere aired below. … And so they should have acted on that information to protect plan participants.
61 min of audioOral argument — Amistad Christiana Church v. City of Las Vegas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2017
You found that the organization is acting in lieu of a traditional state actor, right? It's in historical order. It's a function. … Again, it is the decision by the city to, for this particular period, grant a private entity the right to regulate, not just for the festival.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kevin Brewer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2014
I think he laid out the anticipated issues that would come up in a notice and comment period. So where's the comment part of the notice and comment? … A seven-month period of time, from my experience, is just not realistic. And then we talk about . . . It did, but it could have acted on its own.
31 min of audioOral argument — Boehler v. Christie
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2011
So they don't have any doctor tying any specific act of any of either of these nurses to the death. Don't have it. … Moreover, factually, if you just look at it in this record, by the time they call ARCH ambulance, and it's air ambulance, so ARCH sends a helicopter over to pick up Ms. Mitten.
29 min of audioOral argument — T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The Loudoun County Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013
Clearly, we're dealing with a limited preemption in this act. … I think about over the period of those various hearings, three or four of the supervisors were concerned about it.
51 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.