Documents

Oral argument — Joseph Angeles v. US Airways, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019

Air is enforcing it here a violation of the CBA? No. The CBA is not a violation of the statute if it doesn't pay the premium wage rates. Yes. The CBA does violate Labor Code 514. Okay. … It has continued unmolested through this entire time period right through to the present.

Oral argument — United States v. Anita Sharma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

And the court did not clearly air. She was an average participant. Did she have the role of Rajeshwar Singh? And did she have the role of Surjit Singh? No. … So her intent from the beginning was to gain equity in-house, lie about the paperwork to get the loan, and she acted like a straw buyer.

Oral argument — Karlene Gilmore v. State of Mississippi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2018

But in response to your comment earlier, Judge Engelhardt, it is the status of Colonel Gregory Lachelle that is relevant to this inquiry. … Appreciate your comments. Thank you, Your Honors.

Oral argument — United States v. Stacey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2004

And he should have been able to argue that the three that were left within the statute were innocuous acts and not acts of evasion at all. … With regard to the statute of limitations, defendants might have emphasized to the jury a closing argument that it was limited to considering overt acts committed during the statutory period, but the district

Oral argument — United States v. Luis Hernandez-Meza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2013

But the parties now dispute two interim periods between the filing of the information and the start of trial. … So those two days on November 21st and 28th represented the first day of continuance periods.

Oral argument — Angel Colon v. Twitter, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2021

Why isn't that an act of international terrorism? … remedy or acts that may occur over on high seas or in the air.

Oral argument — David Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2016

And we would submit that the DBA is very different than other statutes that may allow the alternative cleaning and that there's no election of remedies. … There was a comment to myself about it, which is noted in the complaint in this case. The comment was that we think he faked an injury. But then they didn't do anything about it.

Oral argument — Thomas Maniscalco v. A. M. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2014

I'm asking you whether there's holding of the Supreme Court that the California Court acted contrary to. … As the court was mentioning, we have the first trial, and then, of course, after the first trial, there has to be a period for everybody to... Typically a period of weeks or months rather than years.

Oral argument — Haas v. Storey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2011

Storey said, you know, I'll clean out the debris and all that. There's a lot of facts within this case dealing with the transaction and how they first started going. … But look at his comments. His comments say, you know, I believe this is injunctive relief. I believe these are, you know, these are the steps. What's the injunctive relief, though?

Oral argument — Standard Security Life Insuran v. FCE Benefit Administrators, In

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2020

That's what Section 6 of the Federal Arbitration Act says. … And when the umpire in an offhand comment during a witness examination used the phrase, Mr. Norzer pushed back on it and pushed back on that characterization.

Oral argument — First Mid-Illinois Bank & Trust v. Parker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2010

No, we're writing on a clean slate, so to speak. The third element of statutory interpretation I'd like the court to consider is the purpose of these two statutes. … And it's a little bit obscure unless you look into some of the comments in the LLC Act.

Oral argument — Toll Brothers, Inc. v. Lin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2011

That is, they have to act in good faith to satisfy the conditions and within a reasonable time. … As this Court is quite aware, this is a very, very complex transaction that was performed over a period of years.

Oral argument — United States v. Larry Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022

Period. And so if you're under B1A, it doesn't matter what the number is for A. That doesn't necessarily translate for B or C. Right. … And if we were, you know, maybe talking with a clean slate, that might be the case.

Oral argument — Zachary v. Southwest Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2008

And that's a survey that they did of their members following the air crash that led to the litigation in which these documents were filed. … It would hardly be an idle act, as Appellant has argued, to issue an order telling the district court, look, you need to do a little bit more here.

Oral argument — FIRST ANNAPOLIS BANCORP v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

Air Force. And 201071381 v. DDA. The first argument will be on case number 20105032, FIRST ANNAPOLIS BANCORP v. United States. Mr. Dinser, are you ready? Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. … They would have a better argument if they had acted on or been required to act on the RCMDA, which they never did.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwight Jenkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2021

that the court entered was not full or complete, you know, it almost seems like to me it might be malpractice if you didn't file that thing immediately and invest in the jurisdiction to keep it from cleaning … it up, rather than waiting the full period of time for the notice of appeal.

Oral argument — Velazquez v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2011

Judge, I think as to what's really at issue here, I've said just about everything there is to say, unless you have a comment. I don't believe we do. Thank you, counsel. Thank you. Counsel? … Because Stamps got that out of thin air that the case that they cited for that proposition didn't hold that well. The holding was later picked up and showed up in the assets and so forth.

Oral argument — Kaita v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

According to your position and maybe her testimony, she was not the only woman who had been taken by the RUF to wash clothes, to clean, cook, and for great purposes. … So you can comment on that. And also, why shouldn't they send her back now?

Oral argument — Cloyd v. KBR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2022

We are not saying that KBR and the military failed to properly act during the missile attack or in the hours leading up to it, but there was a period of days, January, at least January 4th through January … She is cleaning a cafeteria. The record evidence does not prove as a matter of law she was essential. The only record evidence is the opposite.

Oral argument — Hubert Acevedo v. Alex de la Portilla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

And Carollo already establishes that the question is whether he was acting as a private citizen and whether or not his comments involved a matter of public concern. … But if we just, if we find that just some of his comments were protected First Amendment comments, then that's, that's all we really need to do to affirm the district court.