Documents

Oral argument — Michael Thompson v. Lloyd Rapelje

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

events that occur between the opening promise and decision doesn't that dilute a little bit the forcefulness of how prejudicial it is to promise and then not deliver on promise it just shows it's not a clean-cut … back around to I mean if you fail to adjust you're going to prejudice your your client just the same so but in this instance I mean the prejudice was essentially baked in when he made that deficient comment

Oral argument — American Clinical Laboratory Association v. Alex Michael Azar, II, In His Official Capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2019

Congress set forth two distinct acts. The first act was to promulgate, after notice and comment, with different language, the parameters for data collection. … No, but if it adopted a time period where everyone knew, and it's notice and comment. Everyone's told the secretary, don't do a five-day time period.

Oral argument — State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Michael LaRocca

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2025

And that was for a significant period of time, both before we brought our claims and prevailing afterwards. The record is replete with evidence that Dr. … We cite a number of examples in our brief that if they held a grand opening and they released 10 balloons into the air... Is it your argument that in all cases it only works piecemeal?

Oral argument — Adrian Muldrow v. Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2013

And so Royal Farms acted swiftly. Within two hours of making that complaint, they fired him. And that's really the crux of it. … If this guy had an absolutely clean record, maybe the result would have been different, but that's not the issue.

Oral argument — Mickail Myles v. County of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2025

that that wouldn't be like if the if the instruction had added and you can factor this into your damages calculation that would be wrong correct yes all right go ahead please finish I had an anodyne comment … damages I understand the courts the courts understanding of that thank you with my very limited time I would just like to respond to counsel suggestion that argument closing argument was split into a clean

Oral argument — Ty Ellington v. Eclipse Recreational Vehicles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

have followed phyllis hilda it is not respectfully an outlier it is instead a case i i i understand you're uh you're riding uh that case pretty heavily but i guess my my question and let me try to uh clean … why is he wrong i understand the argument he's making that's that's the spin that he's putting on it the dealership this the defect in this case is a latent frame defect where the frame cracks over a period

Oral argument — Correnia Profitt v. Highlands Hospital Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2024

Undoubtedly, she committed numerous acts of negligence, which she conceded, and we put all of those in the pleadings. Okay. … Is there a delay within a period of time, wherever that period of time might fall, if we're not sure where it fell exactly?

Oral argument — United States v. Sa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

She issued a decision in October of 2015, and in that period of time, the Speed of Trial Act started running again after the 30-day time period in 3161H1H, and it expired before the decision on those motions … The motions were being made, so everything was kind of up in the air at that point. Is that right? Yes. She adjourned the trial date sine D because the motions were pending.

Oral argument — Brian McMonagle v. Don Meyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2015

But wipe the slate clean without your client. … So we acted, I think, within a few – six or seven days, I think. It was a few days of the Bull Cumming decision.

Oral argument — People v. Colbert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2024

And the defendant's comments are at 463 to 464. Trial court's comment is at 493. … So, she did act appropriately. She acted strategically. And she did then present, sorry, she did then present evidence.

Oral argument — United States v. Alejandro Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Finish your comment. Okay. Sorry. I was supposed to look at the lights. I have a couple of questions for you. … So I want to go back to plein air. You really didn't answer my question. That's right. So why wasn't it plein air?

Oral argument — Thomas Ostly v. City and County of San Francisco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2024

So I'm sure there were other people that just — it was clean, said, hey, you're not my kind of DA, you're out of here. … Justice, as my time is up, may I make one comment about the affirmative defense? Sure.

Oral argument — Condominium Association of Commonwealth Plaza v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2009

But again, because it was not raised, it was not in the air. It was not in the air of, in the contemplation of the parties. … legislatively, and they're not acting arbitrarily.

Oral argument — Masood v. Division of Professional Regulation of the Illinois Dept. of Financial and Professional Regulation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

So if you're a doctor and someone comes to you and they have pain and they're not taking anything, you've got a clean slate. You prescribe what you prescribe. … and the Controlled Substances Act.

Oral argument — Jason King v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

It says during a six-month period, I'm reading from page 31 of the joint appendix, during the six-month period, the plaintiff was evaluated approximately eight times by dental staff. … One of the things that Iqbal and Twombly say is that they're very tough on even conclusory, on conclusory pleadings, where, in other words, you just can't plead the standard and say he acted or she acted

Oral argument — United States v. Larry Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022

Period. And so if you're under B1A, it doesn't matter what the number is for A. That doesn't necessarily translate for B or C. Right. … And if we were, you know, maybe talking with a clean slate, that might be the case.

Oral argument — Jesus Hernandez v. Unknown Named Agents

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2017

If I could start on the Fifth Amendment, because I think on the Fifth Amendment there's a very clean way to resolve this case on qualified immunity grounds. … My final comment is a practical one, and that is this family did the most responsible thing that they could do in these circumstances.

Oral argument — United States v. Jonathan Anderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2023

I recognize that's a short period of time. On one of them, if you look at the other one, it's 1 minute and 14 seconds. 1 minute and 14 seconds? Right. … You might not fill out the inventory form, but that doesn't mean the officer's acting in bad faith.

Oral argument — David Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2016

And we would submit that the DBA is very different than other statutes that may allow the alternative cleaning and that there's no election of remedies. … There was a comment to myself about it, which is noted in the complaint in this case. The comment was that we think he faked an injury. But then they didn't do anything about it.

Oral argument — Sofa Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Productions, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2013

language, it becomes all the more susceptible to comment, all the more deserving of comment by others, and this is precisely that kind of moment. … It no longer applies to the brand, but it becomes a thing, or frigid air becomes a refrigerator. I guess it can in that sense. I mean, that's true.