Documents

Oral argument — Ramsay Scarlett & Company v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

There's no doubt that there's an elephant worth of exposure under the State Act, and that the exposures are lesser under the Longshore Act. … Because one of the jobs that the employer had was to monitor the air, to monitor the employees periodically, to follow these regulations, to give the employees some safety information and training.

Oral argument — Gloverv.Federal Deposit Insurance Corporationetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2012

In March the debt collector went outside the bona fide air defense because they were notified by Wells Fargo that this debt had been paid or substantially paid. … All we said is the only act complained of is the filing of the complaint. There was no other act, affirmative act alleged.

Oral argument — NLRB v. CNN America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2017

The case that it cited to is Capitol Cleaning, and holds that out as the precedent for you to follow. … As we have argued in our brief, Capitol Cleaning also doesn't apply here, and cannot apply and has never applied in a situation if you agree with our joint employer status.

Oral argument — Scott Schmidt v. Brian Foster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

He was not able to act as his client's assistant, advocate, counselor. … In Woods, you've accurately described why the absence for a short period of time allegedly didn't impact.

Oral argument — In Re: John McFadden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016

If we act here, does that keep him from going to state court? No. No, Your Honor. No, it does not. So what does holding an abeyance do? Nothing. … So active incarceration was six if you kept your nose clean and then you got to go home. Well, Your Honor, that's exactly the point, if you kept your nose clean.

Oral argument — The Diocese of Quincy v. The Episcopal Church

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2014

It says, clean up your documents and solidify your relationships before any type of dispute arises. You know, Mr. … They acted. They continued to act. They functioned under the not-for-profit corporation law of the state of Illinois.

Oral argument — United States v. Jessica Reznicek

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2022

I understand the Court's point that there was discussion of all of those different guideline ranges, but I think that notwithstanding the Court's comment, there is not a basis for finding harmless error … That's absolutely not the case, and this dovetails a bit with the harmless air question that Judge Strauss just asked. It has to do with the overall conduct. This was not lawful political protest.

Oral argument — Correnia Profitt v. Highlands Hospital Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2024

Undoubtedly, she committed numerous acts of negligence, which she conceded, and we put all of those in the pleadings. Okay. … Is there a delay within a period of time, wherever that period of time might fall, if we're not sure where it fell exactly?

Oral argument — United States v. Sa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

She issued a decision in October of 2015, and in that period of time, the Speed of Trial Act started running again after the 30-day time period in 3161H1H, and it expired before the decision on those motions … The motions were being made, so everything was kind of up in the air at that point. Is that right? Yes. She adjourned the trial date sine D because the motions were pending.

Oral argument — Dixon v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2016

Department of the Air Force, where an employee there who continued to perform a full range of her duties. … And then these couple other comments, I don't know this person.

Oral argument — Brian McMonagle v. Don Meyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2015

But wipe the slate clean without your client. … So we acted, I think, within a few – six or seven days, I think. It was a few days of the Bull Cumming decision.

Oral argument — Boechler v. Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

Was this just a comment to some politicians passing through that too much money was being spent, which seems to me to be typical and ordinary? Or was it a more serious whistleblowing? … How much does the grand jury indictment wipe clean the charges Mr. Thompson is making about activities before the indictment? I'm not sure I understand, Your Honor. The charges of whistleblowing?

Oral argument — Jimmy Haynes v. Waste Connections, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2019

Under Fourth Circuit precedent, Your Honor, the issue in summary judgment is not whether someone did or did not, in fact, do or do not a certain alleged act. … Then the alleged comment about the upcoming performance evaluations, don't worry, you've got nothing to worry about. Noticeably, Mr. Fountain did not say. The slate is now clean, Mr. Haynes.

Oral argument — Bettis v. Marsaglia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014

And it's not covered under the Administrative Review Act because 1010 doesn't ask that this be saved. This is to be governed under the Administrative Review Act. … This was a school that they cleaned out the library and put some tables and chairs in it. We sat down and they had an electoral board hearing. That was it.

Oral argument — Mickail Myles v. County of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2025

that that wouldn't be like if the if the instruction had added and you can factor this into your damages calculation that would be wrong correct yes all right go ahead please finish I had an anodyne comment … damages I understand the courts the courts understanding of that thank you with my very limited time I would just like to respond to counsel suggestion that argument closing argument was split into a clean

Oral argument — United States v. Larry Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022

Period. And so if you're under B1A, it doesn't matter what the number is for A. That doesn't necessarily translate for B or C. Right. … And if we were, you know, maybe talking with a clean slate, that might be the case.

Oral argument — Jesus Hernandez v. Unknown Named Agents

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2017

If I could start on the Fifth Amendment, because I think on the Fifth Amendment there's a very clean way to resolve this case on qualified immunity grounds. … My final comment is a practical one, and that is this family did the most responsible thing that they could do in these circumstances.

Oral argument — David Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2016

And we would submit that the DBA is very different than other statutes that may allow the alternative cleaning and that there's no election of remedies. … There was a comment to myself about it, which is noted in the complaint in this case. The comment was that we think he faked an injury. But then they didn't do anything about it.

Oral argument — Citizens for Balanced Use v. Kathleen McAllister

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

Summarize for me, if you can, why that was air, what the district court did, and as concisely as possible. … Citizens believes that the integrity of NEPA was compromised in this case when the Forest Service didn't adequately address their concerns as communicated in their comments and those of Dr.

Oral argument — United States v. Cascella

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2019

He was not making these remarks out of whole cloth or out of thin air or in the abstract. … And prosecutors get trained by reading First Circuit decisions, and they look at what types of comments result in reversals, what types of comments the court pronounces as being improper.