Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.52s
Oral argument — Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026
Just to pick up on what Judge Stack was asking about, it says the board shall publish for public comment a set of pricing principles. … They've got a sue-and-be-sue clause under the Federal Reserve Act.
62 min of audioOral argument — Lockhart v. Repub Srv
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021
Here, the district court aired an excluding evidence of slurs tolerated and used by Kenneth as circumstantial evidence of race discrimination. … I will say quickly with respect to the underlying Fair Labor Standards Act issue, and this is briefed extensively in our briefing, on the Fair Labor Standards Act issue, the, and following on the opinion
40 min of audioOral argument — Chanda Smith v. LAUSD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2016
Yes, and we would also ask the court to consider that two proposed interveners, acting independently of each other, filed motions relatively within the same period. … He said, we just basically pulled it out of the air. There was no negotiations. There was no data behind it. There was nothing. Why did they have to pull it out of the air?
63 min of audioOral argument — TIANJIN MAGNESIUM INTL v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2012
That is a totally credible rate and it's really a gold standard in terms of AFA rates because it's a rate from only the prior year, very, very clean, unchallenged, never invalidated, never indicted. … I have only some brief comments on this. Acting to the best of one's ability.
39 min of audioOral argument — Zachary Silbersher v. Allergan, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2022
I have one question and one comment. My comment is that because I'm giving an extra six minutes to Ms. Murphy, that Mr. Hoffman, I wanted to tell you and ask the court reporter. … One is that the state of California doesn't enforce the false claims act, the federal false claims act, and that the United States government and department of justice has never adopted this position that
48 min of audioOral argument — Velazquez v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2011
Judge, I think as to what's really at issue here, I've said just about everything there is to say, unless you have a comment. I don't believe we do. Thank you, counsel. Thank you. Counsel? … Because Stamps got that out of thin air that the case that they cited for that proposition didn't hold that well. The holding was later picked up and showed up in the assets and so forth.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Steven Pennycooke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2025
And here, when you look at the judge's comments, it doesn't appear that he's talking at all about punishment for the original offense, which is what Esteros prohibits. … Petticoat's violations, but he said the sentence is also to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment, period.
30 min of audioOral argument — JAMES LINICK v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2013
Let me comment about the first… Which we reviewed for clear error, correct? Oh, I understand that. … There's a debate about the 1997 through 2002 marketing period, and you said you didn't give any evidence of him showing that at that point he didn't have a secrecy order in place.
37 min of audioOral argument — John Spells v. New Orleans City
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017
There were no further administrative remedies available because by the time our clients learned of it, all of the appeal periods had lapsed. … Well, the other point I was going to make in response to a comment that was made is what else the city could have done.
34 min of audioOral argument — Punaofo Tilei v. CDCR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2016
Let's say that we look at the case that was aired and screening it out, and the court said, well, now you've got to amend, and he tells the court, I cannot amend. … this Rule 41 dismissal, then it precludes, if the district court proceeds along those grounds under your theory, then it really prevents review of the merits of the initial dismissal of the complaint period
29 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2023
There was some comment as to the contents of the document, which were then addressed later, namely the Smith's mental health condition. But there was no explicit authentication argument made. … Yes, there was an initial period of time granted to the government to provide documents to establish the Smith's removability, yes.
34 min of audioOral argument — Shamrock Hills, LLC v. State of Iowa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2026
To understand the application of this law, you have to look at the speech, period. Unless the court has any further questions, I'll reserve the remainder of my time. Thank you. … I think we can look at that statute and see they're trying to clean some things up. The structure of the statute shows that 522C is still a status-based restriction.
32 min of audioOral argument — New Fortress Energy Inc. v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2022
FERC says a pipeline is a pipe that transmits gas, period. And it's interpreting its own precedent, which FERC says in no way depends on the characteristics of the pipeline. … We have a clean, straightforward legal question before us today about the FERC's decision. We have a petition for review of that decision.
45 min of audioOral argument — San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2024
It is though it evaporated into thin air. What does that mean? To us, it means a reversal of course. … The most recent schedule change saw a two-period window.
48 min of audioOral argument — Brian Hope v. Commissioner of Indiana Depart
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2021
You're drawing a very sharp line between the existence of a prior registration requirement, which you say is fine, and the act that gave rise to that prior registration requirement, which was the period … It's not a case that is as clean as Zobel or Hooper, where you're looking at a specific date and were you a resident on that date.
48 min of audioOral argument — Langston v. Dallas Commodity Co
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025
three, the creditor had to file is, you know, of any case for the applying force out 1003 where the trustees error penalizes the creditor because there's plenty of case law that says, Well, trustee, no clean … So the onus is maybe on the trustee, but it's transferring to the creditors if they don't act promptly enough to take matters into their own hands, I guess, if the trustee doesn't follow that rule.
43 min of audioOral argument — City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2025
And among other things, when the models are applied to the five-year period the plaintiffs call their clean period, the models purport to tell us that up to 100% of BRDOs were injured by a non-existent … The district court carefully considered all of the evidence in concluding that common issues predominate and acted well within its discretion in certifying the class.
43 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. North LV Police Dept
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008
Maybe we should address that now on the merits and clean that up. … And as I understand this, in the Nevada statute, and as I understand this paragraph, CMS has qualified immunity if it did not act, if it exercised due care.
42 min of audioOral argument — Joseph Angeles v. US Airways, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019
Air is enforcing it here a violation of the CBA? No. The CBA is not a violation of the statute if it doesn't pay the premium wage rates. Yes. The CBA does violate Labor Code 514. Okay. … It has continued unmolested through this entire time period right through to the present.
31 min of audioOral argument — State of Wisconsin, Department v. EDUC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2020
So just incorporate that thought in your comments. If the case was remanded and all of the other applicants could re-interview, we would have had the same result. … The 2011 interviews process was wiped away clean when Mr. Greco decided that there needed to be a redo, as we want to call it, in 2013. So Mr. Faple, who Ms.
38 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.