Documents

Oral argument — Laverne McIver v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2021

It's just the informing act that explains how a reasonable jury would connect those dots. … And let's imagine, just from a hypothetical to clean it up a little bit, that we have evidence of that from 2015 forward, right?

Oral argument — Eugene Dunston v. Donnie Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2014

And at that point in time, all the officer has done is use a takedown maneuver, period. … Now he's coming to court and saying, no, I contend that Officer Douglas did violate my constitutional rights, that he did act outside the lawful duties of that office.

Oral argument — Schwartz v. Accuratus

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2015

There are some cases that warrant a longer period to argue in chief, and I thought this was the kind of case that may warrant a substantial rebuttal period, but I'll be mindful of that. … She did the towels and cleaned the apartment for both of the roommates. Well, what is cohabiting? I think that's one of the questions that's a little doubtful.

Oral argument — Melford Wilson v. City of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

Put him up in the air. Now put him down. Now put him up. Now put him down. Now put him up. … And when he was too slow putting him up the third time in this little exercise of authoritarian control and humiliation being acted out, when he was too slow, the officer then says, you're resisting, you're

Oral argument — Mendoza-Mazariegos v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007

So although it was a long period of time for an immigration case, it was all at the none of the continuance requests were by Mr. … Bell Gardens was developed by Alonzo Bell, who developed Bell Air, who discovered oil and Brea, and they were next to it. So they built Bell Air, Bell, Bellflower, Bell Gardens. Absolutely.

Oral argument — Tauno Waidla v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024

And I would say that for the time period, it was extremely heinous. … And reinitiation can be an act.

Oral argument — In Re Wells Fargo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2019

They came over a period of time for no money, the so-called zero purchase price repo. So they were bundled with other securities where there was a lot of compensation. … You can't just pull a number out of thin air and say that's our value. If you can't explain how you came up with it, that is by definition arbitrary. What were their alternatives?

Oral argument — Sons of Confederate Veterans v. City of Lexington, Virginia

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

Three issues before the Court as the appellant will underscore today are whether the enacting of Section 120-205 by the City of Lexington equated to the closing of a forum, the second being whether this act … Diaz your comments regarding O'Brien and Kensington a little further in O'Brien this established that laws regulating conduct that have an incidental effect on speech may not be challenged under the first

Oral argument — Ramsay Scarlett & Company v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

There's no doubt that there's an elephant worth of exposure under the State Act, and that the exposures are lesser under the Longshore Act. … Because one of the jobs that the employer had was to monitor the air, to monitor the employees periodically, to follow these regulations, to give the employees some safety information and training.

Oral argument — People v. Hunt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2009

Reviewing courts should review, not write on a clean slate and forever tie the hands of the litigants to present existing proof and argument that would actually refute the new theory that the appellate … Your Honors, I have a couple of brief comments to Defense Counsel's argument.

Oral argument — Hedquist v. Patterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

That's not an act directed at Mr. Hedquist. That's an act directed at HCI. … And the memo in that only refers to one comment being made by Craig Hedquist. And that comment had to do with how one of Mr.

Oral argument — David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2020

He encouraged us to work together cooperatively so that the evidence could help establish a clear and clean record for you to review. … So, Your Honor, you can't forget also, in 1988, they entered into this transaction, and for a period of 1988 to 1993, there were no claims made against these works.

Oral argument — Julie Su v. Medical Staffing of America, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2024

across multiple states across a seven-year period. … It will be an increase, but it won't be a clean doubling.

Oral argument — Hannah Fredrickson v. Starbucks Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016

If we decide that the Tax Injunction Act doesn't apply, where are you? Then we would devolve to comity. The fact that federal courts shouldn't be mucking about in state court tax regimes. Period. … If they're going to make up a number out of thin air, then they have to put that in box eight on the W-2 and not withhold based on that number.

Oral argument — Sharon Thomas v. The Salvation Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016

Thomas sufficiently pled discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act? … Thomas's personal circumstances in that interim period.

Oral argument — Everardo Carrillo v. Schneider Logistics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2012

No, but not acting as an officer of SLI, acting for SLTD. SLI was a defendant in the case. She submitted that as Secretary-Treasurer of SLI. That's what her declaration says. … You have engaged in direct acts of retaliation.

Oral argument — Open Justice Baltimore v. Baltimore City Law Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024

First, plaintiffs pled a plausible retaliation claim as our clients previously aired criticism of defendants, so it is plausible that defendants delayed and obstructed requests because of previous criticism … I'd like to point out that— In the Monell proposition, there's no right to—there's no mandate or right of access to government information or sources within the government's control, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Anita Sharma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

And the court did not clearly air. She was an average participant. Did she have the role of Rajeshwar Singh? And did she have the role of Surjit Singh? No. … So her intent from the beginning was to gain equity in-house, lie about the paperwork to get the loan, and she acted like a straw buyer.

Oral argument — John Wootrn v. Pat Warren

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020

He made some comments, some of them rather gratuitous and off the point, some of which were expressing displeasure with the prosecutor. … If he's trying to infer that because the defendant didn't come forward, because he took four months and didn't say anything to the police, that's not a reasonable way to act if you're actually acting in

Oral argument — Trent v. Solorzano

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2025

Now, first and foremost, this alleged conversation violates the Dead Man's Act. … At any time during that four-year period, was there a change in the responsibilities that Mr. Solorzano was required to provide? It doesn't appear so from the record other than the swimming.