Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Oral argument — United States v. Cascella
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2019
He was not making these remarks out of whole cloth or out of thin air or in the abstract. … And prosecutors get trained by reading First Circuit decisions, and they look at what types of comments result in reversals, what types of comments the court pronounces as being improper.
30 min of audioOral argument — Holsapple v. State of Illinois Human Rights Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019
And so he had a temporary duty assignment with air operations. And what was nice about that for him was that they maintained the same rank and same salary. … And so I don't think there's any dispute under Illinois law and federal law if it's a pattern, hostile work environment, then the last act, the last act, becomes the time where the 180 days begins to run
32 min of audioOral argument — Consolidation Coal Company v. Theodore Latusek, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017
And I think when you think about it in that fashion, the author's comment in that article that it is unknown whether the condition is related to coal dust exposure further weakens the claimant's case. … Lymph nodes are a way station by which the lymphatic system cleans the lungs of impurities. Dr. Rosenberg, Dr. Wren, Dr. Spagnuolo all read that in this report. They read Dr. Noya's explanation.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Piers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2009
That's a fairly significant comment, and in looking at the record, I tend to agree with it. … They saw the van and they saw the driver, clean-faced, however he had a Fu Manchu mustache. He wasn't wearing any ski masks. And he was identified as wearing brown clothing.
24 min of audioOral argument — Federal Home Loan Bank of Bost v. Moody's Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2016
And the statute and the legislative history of the Improvement Act itself is all about subject matter jurisdiction. And I think it is telling. … And indeed, I believe you would be writing on a clean slate in terms of a full analysis of the statute. Can I answer any other questions for you about 1631?
29 min of audioOral argument — 20 Dogwood LLC v. Village of Roslyn Harbor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024
No, you're breaking those down into individual acts. The theory of the case here is that, collectively, these acts reflect an effort to drive them out of their home. … Here, I find it hard to think that belittling someone's ethnicity, yelling at an ill, older woman, writing up summonses out of thin air, telling prospective purchasers lies about the property, altering
22 min of audioOral argument — Walker v. McGuire
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015
Part of the problem there is if it doesn't bar adjudicative, then you revert to Article 9, which bars fee offices, period. … Those provisions are in the Illinois Housing Development Act. That is where the program is created. It's described. Its purposes and operations are set out.
50 min of audioOral argument — People v. Fulton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2023
So do we know over what period of time this took place? We don't know about Christopher Collazo's actual murder. I don't know. … But I also think that the appellate court takes serious consideration in promulgating the abuse of discretion standard under the plain language of the act.
47 min of audioOral argument — Hedquist v. Patterson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018
That's not an act directed at Mr. Hedquist. That's an act directed at HCI. … And the memo in that only refers to one comment being made by Craig Hedquist. And that comment had to do with how one of Mr.
37 min of audioOral argument — Vaszily v. Treasury
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2006
Absolutely no evidence whatsoever, none, connecting any of those acts to the husband. … With all due respect, I'm trying to figure out why, we were trying to figure out why he undertook these acts.
27 min of audioOral argument — Dewey v. Volkswagen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2012
I understand that, and I appreciate that comment, that I think that really the concern of the objectors is the valuation, not the question of value. You didn't have that option in those cases. … But it does say very clearly, if an act of Congress covers the area, that's the first place you look. And the Rules Enabling Act put the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in place for this purpose.
57 min of audioOral argument — Basim Haddad v. Randall S Miller Assoc PC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 30, 2014
Your Honors, this is a case brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. … For purposes of this case, I think we can assume that this act doesn't really care about how the debt came about. And this act doesn't really care about how the debt is treated vis-a-vis the debtor.
26 min of audioOral argument — In re: Search Warrant dated November 3, 2021
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2024
Well, Your Honor, because the petitioners acted in reliance on this cloak of confidentiality, which they played a part in creating along with the source. … If it was the case that there was a clean way to parse that out, then that may be the case. I'm not sure that that's possible. I don't know. Nobody's I know it hasn't been raised.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hung Dong
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013
So moving to the 404B issue, the district court should not have admitted other acts evidence in the form of the phone calls that were played during the trial. … So we don't even know whether what anything that Joe was talking about was at a relevant time period.
30 min of audioOral argument — Mackay v. Aircraft Mechanics
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2008
After two prior trips to this Court, this case now presents a clean legal issue. … Under cases like United Nuclear, which says that the union cannot conscript people and act in an ultra-virase manner.
29 min of audioOral argument — Kenneth Hunt v. Dale Acosta
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2026
Hunt, period, end argument, or I guess it was quasi-judicial immunity is what we said, but he had immunity for that first stop. The question was the extension and seizure of Mr. … So, as I understand the law, is that I get a clean slate when I go to the trial and the evidence should have been put forth in the fairest manner to both parties. That's a fair point, though.
29 min of audioOral argument — Coralynn White v. Joseph Fitzpatrick
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2018
She had no opportunity to wipe it clean. I'll take a lie detector test. Bernson said, well, no, I'm not going to give you a lie detector test. … They were sued under a 1983 theory, no evidence of them being a state actor, no evidence of any type of collusion acting in concert.
37 min of audioOral argument — Cushing v. Willis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2018
That's not a very good contract, but the parties apparently abided by it for a period of time. … Also that the court went on to state that the forcible entry and detainer act was amended in terms which permit matters germane to the introduction of evidence by the defendant.
53 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Steven Ferguson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2012
He did this for a long period of time. … One could say that it's an employment act at some level for lawyers. And it's lessened, it's lessened the role of the probation officer in this country today.
41 min of audioOral argument — Bradley Petry v. Prosperity Mortgage Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014
You're going to help me and clean me up on this because I'm not understanding that relationship very well. … It didn't act as a broker in this case. So it matters not that Wachovia owns 50% of it. It does not matter. And I appreciate your comment. It's not relevant. Prosperity is a legitimate joint venture.
59 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.