Documents

Oral argument — Benoit Brookens v. Larhonda Gamble

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2022

This case is about whether the district court enforce a statute that was aired in its reading of the statute 20-9 USC 419412. … Period. And the language I read that under this statutory scheme , government only local or council is not engaged in an industry affecting commerce.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Gabor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2014

That being said, this was also a RICO predicate act not specifically tried to the jury. … 50% of the summers wouldn't go to 50% over a five-year period.

Oral argument — Alaska Oil and Gas Association v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2015

And so, what is it that you, what was it that the comment said that the agency should have done here instead of the five miles? … But the record is filled with examples of bears coming to these native villages, to Air Force bases in this area, to various places.

Oral argument — Murphy v. Townsend

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2003

This Court, in effect, would be acting as a lateral court of appeals on that verdict. … He omitted from his State court claim an actual identification of Section 1983, the Civil Rights Act.

Oral argument — 1-17-1484

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2020

That's how I read that comment. Yeah, would you agree with me, though? … And so, in effect, the attorney in Palmer acted as the victim's attorney. And we don't have that here. We have testimony here from the attorney that he never acted as her attorney.

Oral argument — 22-2262_Utility Workers United Assn v. Utility Workers Union America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2023

We calculated—they arbitrated a couple of cases in that period of time. … Well, they were a component of a larger pie, but for instance, and I'm just pulling numbers out of the air.

Oral argument — John Wootrn v. Pat Warren

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020

He made some comments, some of them rather gratuitous and off the point, some of which were expressing displeasure with the prosecutor. … If he's trying to infer that because the defendant didn't come forward, because he took four months and didn't say anything to the police, that's not a reasonable way to act if you're actually acting in

Oral argument — Mountain Crest SRL, LLC v. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2018

Like a contract that's just clean on its face and then maybe two low-level agents somewhere, you know, there's a suitcase of cash that just push the contract over the table. … Your Honor, I basically disagree with that comment, but I'll characterize it this way because I think it's a little bit more complex.

Oral argument — TeWinkle v. Capital One, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

But as to the plaintiff in particular, who alleges that he was in New York during the relevant period, New York's Human Rights Act, and in particular section 296-A, has a very broad ban on credit discrimination … And then we look at the regulation and to answer, I think, just to just to clean up an answer that was asked with regard to the regulatory definition of applicant.

Oral argument — Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2019

If they were writing on a clean slate, going prospectively, that they may well release this information, they said they likely would. … In this context is to where there has been 40 years of notice and comment regulations by a high, high level of government sign-off, right?

Oral argument — Media Matters for America v. Warren Paxton, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024

The act is not the issuance of the CID? … absent some compulsory act by the government, that is self inflicted. There is no compulsory act for a lot of the reasons that judge Edwards was describing.

Oral argument — United States v. Bagley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

And then after that, you continued to engage in gun trafficking over a prolonged period of time. You expressed in text messages that you knew what you were doing was wrong. … on pretrial release, which was, I think indisputably, an excellent record on pretrial release, but the court's interpretation of that record was, well, he's just smart enough to know to keep his nose clean

Oral argument — La Cocina de Oaxaca, LLC v. Tri-State Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2022

I mean, you can recover for certain time periods and so on. But so that doesn't seem right. … Just take a clean run on this. So we're back to, if we've got coverage, then we get to your exclusion and your best interpretation of this is what?

Oral argument — Melford Wilson v. City of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

Put him up in the air. Now put him down. Now put him up. Now put him down. Now put him up. … And when he was too slow putting him up the third time in this little exercise of authoritarian control and humiliation being acted out, when he was too slow, the officer then says, you're resisting, you're

Oral argument — Oman Fasteners, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2024

We are the intended beneficiary, or one of the intended beneficiaries, of the remedial effects of anti-dumping and countervailing due to laws that are included in the Tariff Act. … That proves that had I known how bad the penalty would be, I would have come clean.

Oral argument — Trejo-Mejia v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

It's not just plucked out of the air. I disagree, Your Honor. She does not have a relationship with the Ninth Circuit. … Is that something that you're authorized to comment on one way or the other? Well, I wouldn't want to give you a firm yes or no, because I would need to consult with our client about that.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Cityof PA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

In that case, the plaintiff's lawyer made representations repeatedly to the client and to the court that there were various cleanings that would be filed. It wasn't done. … Could you comment on the propriety of that dismissal? Yes. Your Honor commented about the Poulos factors.

Oral argument — City of Martinez v. New Hampshire

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

That's just open air. Is it sort of like a restaurant on poles? That's my understanding, Your Honor. So there isn't underneath it a basement area that you can store things? Correct. … So you're saying, well, it's wrongful entry, eviction or wrongful entry, period, because nothing short of trespass will ever amount to coverage under this case. So it eliminates. It also treats.

Oral argument — United States v. Morgan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2026

So if the district court didn't, you know, give a great reasoning on the 403 ruling, or even if it was just really perfunctory, is that subject to harmless air review? … Just period. Couldn't the district court look at that in a pretrial motion and say, wow, I'm looking at this and under the statute.

Oral argument — Mumtaz Hussaini v. Loretta Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2016

There is one issue in this case, and that's the agency acted well within its discretion when it denied petitioners' motion for a continuance of their removal proceedings to await relief that would not … It states that they are not eligible to adjust if the person has worked in the United States unlawfully or has stayed here in a period of unlawful presence or without valid status.