Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Oral argument — Dupuch-Carron v. HHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2020
Did he mean return by air? Did he mean return in person? What I'm trying to get at is whether or not I'm trying to indicate to you that I don't agree with you that the word return is never ambiguous. … of the Act.
30 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2012
that five-year period. … He comes up with this idea, this test of arbitrariness, out of, I submit, thin air. He invented it.
53 min of audioOral argument — Remington v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015
It was going after what may have been during a period of great building addressed to a particular concern. How is it, and is there any explanation for why it expanded beyond the construction trades? … Congress wanted to have a national uniform standard that was the most efficient standard possible to generate free flow and inexpensive movement of goods both by air and on land.
21 min of audioOral argument — FULBRIGHT v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012
Irwin was a Civil Rights Act case, also not a case involving Section 2501. … Now, granted, if Congress doesn't act, typically they're okay with whatever that prior legal decision was.
22 min of audioOral argument — DW Industries v.Dentsply Int. Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2006
They receive both royalty reports and payments on a periodic basis. Why isn't their lawsuit asking for a specific performance of the accounting term exempt from the arbitration? … trademark violations, violation of the Arizona Trade Secrets Act, tortious interference.
22 min of audioOral argument — Mockbee v. The Austin Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2011
What Justice Cardozo said in that case is that there can't be negligence in the air. There has to be something that ties one to another in creating a tortious linkage, a tortious act. … What I would like to do is to conclude with two comments.
51 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Aguilar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008
Those are my comments about that. … Well, I do think that because it's reviewed for plein air and because there's that concession that this is probably not the appropriate case to reach a further nuanced point in that area.
22 min of audioOral argument — Peter-Pelican v. Mariana Islands
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2005
When you started the trial, my understanding is that that whole issue was up in the air. … So after the trial and for a period of some months afterwards, there were partial payments made upon this civil service situation.
42 min of audioOral argument — Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019
It would be mooted out even as to the Cartwright Act? … Why would California choose to apply the Cartwright Act rather than the law where the final act occurred?
53 min of audioOral argument — United States v. William Bauer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2023
psychotherapy if they needed it They were no longer eligible to get narcotics from him until they took care of those problems and they got some lesser non-controlled substance to tide them over during that time period … So, candidly, I see a couple problems I mean, this instruction if it were a clean slate I think it's pretty hard to square with Ruan One of the reasons is that as to the elements the district court the
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Giwa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008
There was a housekeeper who had come in on October 8th, and the box was there and then cleaned up. … The police and the law enforcement agents were acting on the law at the time.
32 min of audioOral argument — Brent Adkins v. Marathon Petroleum Co LP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2024
The Coast Guard, for good reason, says if you're going to be working on a tanker barge, you have to have respiratory findings of above 75% of forced vital capacity, the ability to blow the air out in one … Nothing remarkable was noted in his periodic history. That's false. What was remarkable was that his pulmonary function was below 70. It was around 67 or 68 at that time.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Isaac Martinez-Chavez
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026
This court has recognized that the liar comment is problematic. … So are you saying that's your position that your hands are clean in any circumstances in terms of that being not preserved?
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Damion Faulkner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018
of time and then possessed at the end of that period and in our case what we have is receipt of child pornography that occurred over about an eight-month period and then two months later he also possessed … for the counts not to prove In order to do a crime you normally have to have you know an Anglo-American criminal jurisprudence you normally have to have intent and actus reus that is facts concerning acts
35 min of audioOral argument — Colacicco v. Apotex
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009
This was not subject to notice and comment. … At the time that that regulation was put forth and the amendments recommended, that was in 1989, it was a comment period.
117 min of audioOral argument — TeWinkle v. Capital One, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021
But as to the plaintiff in particular, who alleges that he was in New York during the relevant period, New York's Human Rights Act, and in particular section 296-A, has a very broad ban on credit discrimination … And then we look at the regulation and to answer, I think, just to just to clean up an answer that was asked with regard to the regulatory definition of applicant.
49 min of audioOral argument — La Cocina de Oaxaca, LLC v. Tri-State Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2022
I mean, you can recover for certain time periods and so on. But so that doesn't seem right. … Just take a clean run on this. So we're back to, if we've got coverage, then we get to your exclusion and your best interpretation of this is what?
32 min of audioOral argument — Jeremy Rocha v. County of Tulare
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2015
I certainly concede there's a possibility that it was a clean search, but we won't know that. What are your Federal constitutional claims? … It was under the Bain Act and similar. But that's also – the Bain Act also encompasses the State constitution as well as the Federal constitution, correct? Yes, for civil rights violations.
26 min of audioOral argument — Paramjeet Malhotra v. Robert Steinberg
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014
I could have called the Postal Service and said, you know, I don't think that guy's clean. I think he's been doping, and he's been presenting false claims to the Postal Service. … My last comment just quickly on the cost issue, because I know it's before the court, is that the district court's ruling on that was, again, based upon its hearing of a full day of testimony.
32 min of audioOral argument — Judith Cole v. Keystone RV Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2022
It said if you're going to do something like live in these things for a long period of time, you have to do certain things to take precautionary steps. … Air out your RV and whatnot, and his response to that was no amount of airing out is going to change the problem if there's a real incursion of gallons of water coming in from a storm.
44 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.