Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Oral argument — John C Ruiz Bueno III v. Zack Scott Douglas Edgington
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015
You don't dispute the duty on the part of the jail to clean it up within a reasonable period of time, even though the conditions were created by him? Absolutely not. … Do you have any authority for an argument of this type whatsoever, that the jailers are responsible for noticing and acting upon a condition that the medical people didn't notice and act upon?
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rodriguez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2023
That most clear one was that of being in the air. But the question is, did that affect the 3553? And the only link is this statement about the information given. I think not, Your Honor. … The expert was describing as very standard the method of measuring blood cleaning.
30 min of audioOral argument — Karuk Tribe of Calif v. USFS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2010
action because of the criteria laid out in the general permit under the Clean Water Act. … That is to say, if you have a general set of criteria in the Clean Water Act, it will be a general permit.
50 min of audioOral argument — People v. Masterson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018
We don't get to the abuse of discretion unless we say that it's plain air. This wasn't preserved. We argued that this was preserved. Was it included in a post-trial motion? … Overall, what the comments show and what his statements to everyone show is that he believed he was justified in what he did. He thought he was acting in self-defense.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Earls
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2023
And that makes it even more clear that the review is for plain air. One purpose of limiting review is it'd be so easy to clean things up if you object. You just sort of skated past. … It just said that she engaged in a sex act, period, or did a sex act, but this incapable of appraising the nature of something, I think means we have to ask, was this woman capable of making some qualitative
34 min of audioOral argument — Hollingsworth v. DVA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2019
However, that does not obviate the requirements of the Civil Service Reform Act. … The – and I would like to address a couple of other comments.
43 min of audioOral argument — Housatonic River Initiative v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2023
So why doesn't the notice and comment period take place? Your Honor, because the essential terms were decided in the settlement negotiation. They took, they got 400 comments. … , again, I respectfully submit that was not an effective notice and comment period.
34 min of audioOral argument — Nicole Burton v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2015
It doesn't have to discuss whether it affected a major – Well, obviously thyroid – in these clean areas, they're doing these chips. … The air is much cleaner in there than it is out, but she said she had to go out. Well, she – The regulation means that she needs less good air?
42 min of audioOral argument — City of Eureka v. Knobloch
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2024
defense and it's essentially a general denial um of the brief the lamarow versus havronic case i actually had the site wrong it's 25 ill app second 51 um this is a case uh involving the civil practice act … my client the way it appropriately should have been given those the notice issues the lack of notice issues were raised from the the court review it from abroad uh under the 366 or the or or the plain air
32 min of audioOral argument — JOSLYN v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2011
However, if during that transition time period, he is placed in temporary duties, which are not his regular duties, he's made to sweep the floors, clean out the halls, and other aspects of menial tasks … I believe he specifically stated, I'm trying to find his comment, well, without wasting time, also what comes into great question is Dr.
31 min of audioOral argument — Sterigenics US, LLC v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2010
They let it vent for three to five minutes so the rear venting system cleans the air. This is a heavily regulated chemical. Now it's clean. So what does he say? … First thing I'd like to comment on is we've heard about a cascade of symptoms. That's Mr. Zmanski's phrase.
24 min of audioOral argument — Knowles Electronics LLC v. Cirrus Logic, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2017
So Noll's essentially went to wipe the board clean and started over and have a more narrow construction so that they can avoid the Halter reference. … So my only comment here is one has to take all this in the context of what was being disputed at the time.
34 min of audioOral argument — Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner Alabama Department of Corrections
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2024
So with those comments, I think we're ready to proceed. Mr. Grass, you may begin your argument. Thank you, Your Honor. Good afternoon, and may it please the court. … The issue is whether the procedures that the department is proposing to use will accomplish that in the time periods they're claiming. And Dr.
82 min of audioOral argument — SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024
BOP, this court's decision in Simple Air and others, the fact that there may be some repetition is not something that should trouble the court. … And the idea that this is, quote, similar to Toyota, that that's supposed to suggest to the board that Toyota would motivate something, I think is asking the board, as this court recently observed, to act
31 min of audioOral argument — Donna Flournoy v. City of Chicago
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2016
Well, the reason is that if that's seven months afterward, it's a clean copy. Correct. That's what I was thinking about. … Fornoy was on an air mattress on the other side of that wall, to the right.
34 min of audioOral argument — Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino''s Pizza, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2023
But when they declined, they commented on it, and they said two things. … I'm not aware of authority that deals with that sort of clean of a hypothetical. But again, in this case, there were a lot of circumstances for patents.
38 min of audioOral argument — State of West Virginia v. HHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2016
And if the states don't act, then the federal government must act. And this Court has found in a number of Clean Air Act cases, including a case called West Virginia v. … EPA and National Association of Clean Air Agencies, that the states have standing to challenge a rule implementing a cooperative federalism regime.
36 min of audioOral argument — Ramshaw Real Estate v. Illinois Properties
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2013
For the period before October 9 or for the period after October 9? Before October 9. Well, until it was terminated, you're talking about a fiduciary obligation. … Just clean right. I don't want to misrepresent. Just clean right. But no, not as to made right cleaning or John Doe painting. No, not at all.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Devan Pierson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019
The Leitchem case said that even that case would have been easy under a plain air standard. And this is that easy case. … Finally, with regard to the First Step Act, the government doesn't have an objection for Pearson writing a brief on the point, but I think it's clear the First Step Act does not apply to Mr. Pearson.
20 min of audioOral argument — Westwood Apex v. Jesus A. Contreras
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011
And today we're appealing a remand order under CAFA, Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. We are under an issue of statutory interpretation. … And what the court did in the Duke Energy case, it dealt with the Clean Air Act, and it said, look, context counts.
14 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.