Documents

Oral argument — Public Utility Dist. 1 of Snohomish

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2005

And now in this rate period, we're talking now about the amendments, it triggered at 48 million in the underlying contracts. … And then it acted inconsistent with the adjudication.

Oral argument — United States v. Leonardo Magallon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

And it was a very short period of time. On the second or the third contact that Officer Smith is asking questions until he Mirandizes him. … And other people testified it was because of his having a clean driving record, correct? That's correct. You heard me, that other people testified.

Oral argument — United States v. HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2005

And that's precisely what occurred before the Sentencing Reform Act. This was a pre-Sentencing Reform Act sentencing. And that's not the scheme that we're operating under today. … The district court basically said, forget the Sentencing Reform Act of 19. What was it, 86? 83, Your Honor. That's right. And we're just going to go back to pre-sentencing reform act law.

Oral argument — CVB v. Elite Comfort Solutions, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2023

And who's being lobbied in this situation where you're issuing press releases after the agencies have acted? No, no. Well, I understand the question. … I hear a period there. And so we'll put a punctuation of a period on that. These were very fine arguments, but all good things must come to an end. So we will consider the case submitted.

Oral argument — Karyn Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2023

First, the City doesn't know that I just pulled this 24-month rule out of thin air, and this very unusual record requires reversal under Rule 56 on I believe this is the first circuit court to dig into … And that's a separate question of when you have a claim based on when the claim accrued, which includes in the post-employment period.

Oral argument — Dunham v. Howd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

What is it about those two acts that make you feel or believe that this conduct fell within those two acts? … And in each motion to dismiss, was this air reporting privilege raised? I know it was for the last. I would assume that it was on the others, but I'm not.

Oral argument — Kyler Moje v. Federal Hockey League LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2015

So with respect to complicity of the client, that's up in the air. There was no... And they had every opportunity to say that, you know, he wasn't complicit and he knew nothing about this. … So he knew, and he knew for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — William Hinesley, III v. Wendy Knight

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2016

Let's air this case out thoroughly because the case is full of reasonable doubt. I have two answers to that, Your Honor. The first is that ex-ante, Mr. … s trial testimony about what ended the sexual act. There's inconsistencies about the duration of the act.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Gabor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2014

That being said, this was also a RICO predicate act not specifically tried to the jury. … 50% of the summers wouldn't go to 50% over a five-year period.

Oral argument — Alaska Oil and Gas Association v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2015

And so, what is it that you, what was it that the comment said that the agency should have done here instead of the five miles? … But the record is filled with examples of bears coming to these native villages, to Air Force bases in this area, to various places.

Oral argument — McClanahan v. McClanahan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

And, in fact, he made several comments on June 23, 2017, and he also commented on the motion for reconsideration that he reads this statute differently than other judges do. … Illinois Domestic Violence Act.

Oral argument — Thomas Howell v. Town of Ball

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2016

by the FBI and actually paid money by the FBI to wear a wire to attend a town meeting where it was discovered that the town officials were committing FEMA fraud by putting numbers that they worked to clean … That's what footnote three says, that it has not acknowledged Cats bought in a False Claims Act case. Not False Claims Act. Yes, ma'am.

Oral argument — 22-2262_Utility Workers United Assn v. Utility Workers Union America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2023

We calculated—they arbitrated a couple of cases in that period of time. … Well, they were a component of a larger pie, but for instance, and I'm just pulling numbers out of the air.

Oral argument — John Wootrn v. Pat Warren

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020

He made some comments, some of them rather gratuitous and off the point, some of which were expressing displeasure with the prosecutor. … If he's trying to infer that because the defendant didn't come forward, because he took four months and didn't say anything to the police, that's not a reasonable way to act if you're actually acting in

Oral argument — Mountain Crest SRL, LLC v. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2018

Like a contract that's just clean on its face and then maybe two low-level agents somewhere, you know, there's a suitcase of cash that just push the contract over the table. … Your Honor, I basically disagree with that comment, but I'll characterize it this way because I think it's a little bit more complex.

Oral argument — Willie Jackson v. Le Centre on Fourth, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2021

During that period of time, Mr. Jackson and only Mr. Jackson, not Mrs. Jackson, filed a lift-stay motion. … because quite frankly, they didn't trust each other in the bankruptcy case and the banks didn't trust anyone, it was critical that there be third-party releases and that everyone move forward with a clean

Oral argument — James Stevens v. MDOC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2023

That's, you know, busing of tables, cleaning of dishes, clearing of the garbage disposal, distributing utensils. And so I don't think at all Mr. Stevens was ambivalent to working in food services. … We also have the period after he was transferred in which he received a lower rate of wages because he wasn't in food services anymore.

Oral argument — Niebauer v. Crane & Co., Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2015

And then the argument is that within a very short period of time, he said, no, no, I'm not going to retire. I've changed my mind. … The next day, he goes in and he cleans out his office. And he writes numerous emails to various colleagues saying, among other things, my last day of work is Wednesday.

Oral argument — TeWinkle v. Capital One, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

But as to the plaintiff in particular, who alleges that he was in New York during the relevant period, New York's Human Rights Act, and in particular section 296-A, has a very broad ban on credit discrimination … And then we look at the regulation and to answer, I think, just to just to clean up an answer that was asked with regard to the regulatory definition of applicant.

Oral argument — La Cocina de Oaxaca, LLC v. Tri-State Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2022

I mean, you can recover for certain time periods and so on. But so that doesn't seem right. … Just take a clean run on this. So we're back to, if we've got coverage, then we get to your exclusion and your best interpretation of this is what?