Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.18s

  • Oral argument — Great Western Air, LLC v. Cirrus Design Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024

    My name is Colleen McCarty, and I represent Rate Western Air, LLC, doing business as Cirrus Aviation Services. … There have been 15 years between 2010 and today, 14 years, and in that period, these parties have been in dispute for 10 of those 14 years.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dupuch-Carron v. HHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2020

    Did he mean return by air? Did he mean return in person? What I'm trying to get at is whether or not I'm trying to indicate to you that I don't agree with you that the word return is never ambiguous. … of the Act.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Holsapple v. State of Illinois Human Rights Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

    And so he had a temporary duty assignment with air operations. And what was nice about that for him was that they maintained the same rank and same salary. … And so I don't think there's any dispute under Illinois law and federal law if it's a pattern, hostile work environment, then the last act, the last act, becomes the time where the 180 days begins to run

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Griggsville-Perry Community Unit School District No. 4 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2012

    that five-year period. … He comes up with this idea, this test of arbitrariness, out of, I submit, thin air. He invented it.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Peter-Pelican v. Mariana Islands

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2005

    When you started the trial, my understanding is that that whole issue was up in the air. … So after the trial and for a period of some months afterwards, there were partial payments made upon this civil service situation.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Curtin Maritime Corp. v. Santa Catalina Island Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

    And wasn't the competition foreclosed for that 50 year period? No, because there were not there before then, there were not two shippers willing and licensed to serve the island. But now there are. … They can't do it by air, and there's no other ports. So if you want to participate in the Catalina freight shipping market, that's the only game in town.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 22-2368_USA v. Perrin_Montgomery

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2024

    It does not contradict the Pennsylvania wire tap act. … Unless the panel has any, that wasn't a question, more of a comment than a question. Uh, I, we would ask the court to affirm. Thank you. Thank you.

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — N. Y. C. C. v. William P. Barr

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2019

    It didn't during that period, but the court has recognized... … I worry that there's some sort of burden out there that just has a complete air of unreality to it on a point like this.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ross v. Warden Francisco Pineda

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013

    Were you told not to tell about the drugs or the sex acts? A little bit more specific. The boy answered, no. There was an objection. It was overruled. … I mean, there's some indication that there, the part about the anal sex didn't come out of the air.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brent Adkins v. Marathon Petroleum Co LP

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2024

    The Coast Guard, for good reason, says if you're going to be working on a tanker barge, you have to have respiratory findings of above 75% of forced vital capacity, the ability to blow the air out in one … Nothing remarkable was noted in his periodic history. That's false. What was remarkable was that his pulmonary function was below 70. It was around 67 or 68 at that time.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Isaac Martinez-Chavez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026

    This court has recognized that the liar comment is problematic. … So are you saying that's your position that your hands are clean in any circumstances in terms of that being not preserved?

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rashod Bethany

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

    The court's comments that Ms. Christensen mentioned, the mandatory minimum is the furthest thing from my mind, is what the court said. … In some cases, it calls it a nullity or it becomes a clean slate. There is no sentence. Mr. Bethany was returned to the MCC. He was still convicted but not sentenced.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Damion Faulkner

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018

    of time and then possessed at the end of that period and in our case what we have is receipt of child pornography that occurred over about an eight-month period and then two months later he also possessed … for the counts not to prove In order to do a crime you normally have to have you know an Anglo-American criminal jurisprudence you normally have to have intent and actus reus that is facts concerning acts

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — TeWinkle v. Capital One, N.A.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

    But as to the plaintiff in particular, who alleges that he was in New York during the relevant period, New York's Human Rights Act, and in particular section 296-A, has a very broad ban on credit discrimination … And then we look at the regulation and to answer, I think, just to just to clean up an answer that was asked with regard to the regulatory definition of applicant.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — La Cocina de Oaxaca, LLC v. Tri-State Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2022

    I mean, you can recover for certain time periods and so on. But so that doesn't seem right. … Just take a clean run on this. So we're back to, if we've got coverage, then we get to your exclusion and your best interpretation of this is what?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Public Utility Dist. 1 of Snohomish

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2005

    And now in this rate period, we're talking now about the amendments, it triggered at 48 million in the underlying contracts. … And then it acted inconsistent with the adjudication.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Leonardo Magallon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

    And it was a very short period of time. On the second or the third contact that Officer Smith is asking questions until he Mirandizes him. … And other people testified it was because of his having a clean driving record, correct? That's correct. You heard me, that other people testified.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2005

    And that's precisely what occurred before the Sentencing Reform Act. This was a pre-Sentencing Reform Act sentencing. And that's not the scheme that we're operating under today. … The district court basically said, forget the Sentencing Reform Act of 19. What was it, 86? 83, Your Honor. That's right. And we're just going to go back to pre-sentencing reform act law.

    17 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Judith Cole v. Keystone RV Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2022

    It said if you're going to do something like live in these things for a long period of time, you have to do certain things to take precautionary steps. … Air out your RV and whatnot, and his response to that was no amount of airing out is going to change the problem if there's a real incursion of gallons of water coming in from a storm.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Oman Fasteners, LLC v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2024

    We are the intended beneficiary, or one of the intended beneficiaries, of the remedial effects of anti-dumping and countervailing due to laws that are included in the Tariff Act. … That proves that had I known how bad the penalty would be, I would have come clean.

    44 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.