Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.21s

  • Oral argument — Roland Harris v. City of Phoenix

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023

    For example, where there was a witness who said that the that the decedent had placed the gun underground and put his hands up in the air. … it's still within the deployment of the flashbang, the grappler would be intentional acts.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

    The board wasn't acting as an advocate in any way. It was acting as a decision maker, just as courts do all the time. … I think we've already made arguments in our brief as to why the PTAB did not air, and I don't think they aired even if you apply Phillips.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Yonas Fikre v. FBI

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018

    My next question is, has the government ever said that it was incorrect, that he should not have been on the list for a certain period of time? No. Okay. … We have in Claim 13 taken on FISA directly and then the subsequent claims, the Stored Communications Act, Wiretap Act. However, they're all interlocking and actually...

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Steve Marquez v. C. Rodriguez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2023

    But it's a very clean statement. … We don't know whether he was attacked within two days or attacked within a much longer period where some sort of a grievance might have been able to go through.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Saunders Group v. Comfortrac

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2007

    Period. Full stop. That's the first sentence of the summary. … For example, Loveless, that is a unique double-acting cylinder, and it's a patent that claims a novel use of an O-ring seal and a double-acting cylinder.

    63 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brandon Hobbs v. Mark Hooks

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

    I'd like to conclude with a quick comment. You know the double-deference standard. You hear the usual gobbledygook from wardens. I'm not going to go into that. … Belli, we want to thank you in particular for your representation here under the Criminal Justice Act.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nunez v. Diaz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

    And what we have here is no clearly delineated acts. There is no pattern of repairs showing control in the landlord. … And I would like to comment on Goula briefly. In that case, it makes perfect sense why the landlord was held to retain control of enough of the stairway to be actionable.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Great Western Air, LLC v. Cirrus Design Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024

    My name is Colleen McCarty, and I represent Rate Western Air, LLC, doing business as Cirrus Aviation Services. … There have been 15 years between 2010 and today, 14 years, and in that period, these parties have been in dispute for 10 of those 14 years.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dupuch-Carron v. HHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2020

    Did he mean return by air? Did he mean return in person? What I'm trying to get at is whether or not I'm trying to indicate to you that I don't agree with you that the word return is never ambiguous. … of the Act.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Amy Dichiara v. Summit Medical Group Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2026

    May I make one comment, Judge? Yeah. I agree with you. I don't think that proves participation. … And I want to leave here, Your Honor, lawsuits, EEOC charges, they don't generate out of thin air. There has to be some protection in the lead-up.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Timothy Capps v. Newmark Southern Region, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2022

    Another issue would be an inability to cure within the cure period. For example, this contract provided 30 days of cure. … Judge Floyd, you made a comment that I'll close with. And that is that this is a bench trial in front of an experienced district court judge. She was the sole fact finder.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — EEOC v. Village at Hamilton Pointe LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023

    I don't know how you can get out from under plain-air review. … What an employer has to do is act reasonably to prevent and to correct. So there are a bunch of different ways that could happen. As Cheney said, Cheney listed a few of the possibilities.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Neil Grenning v. Maggie Miller-Stout

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2018

    here, giving Seattle the worst air quality in the world the last week. … Could you just clarify that though, because the testimony at 71, which is that it's between three and six or 6.5, relates to which period?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Mohamed Farah

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2018

    You join the Royal Canadian Air Force before the United States becomes involved in the Second World War. You're part of a military organization engaged in a war that's declared. … First of all, while it is based on a model Eighth Circuit jury instruction, the comments to that jury instruction make it very clear that it's to be used in a murder case where the accused is a principal

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Allstate Insurance Company v. Fougere

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2023

    Cutler's comments, that because they personally collected that information, it's their information. … Now, there was this comment that was just made about, well, no, they're independent agents.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Griggsville-Perry Community Unit School District No. 4 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2012

    that five-year period. … He comes up with this idea, this test of arbitrariness, out of, I submit, thin air. He invented it.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Gutierrez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

    And so it wasn't like this lady was dead or came in as a cadaver and they're cleaning up the body as funeral homes do to prepare the body for a funeral. He had sex with a dead body. … This all occurred within a short period of time in the defendant's apartment. There's no doubt here that it was one continuous act. With respect to the issue of Batson, there are three steps.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Cope v. Coleman County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

    What we have here is is we have four people acting at the same time, all doing the same thing, all not calling 911. … Would it be a policy that 911 has to be called within a specific period of time? What's the constitutional minimum, in your view?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nicholas Wade v. Solomon Daniels

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2020

    And I cleaned that language up a little bit. Yes, sir. I definitely recognize that. … And if it was use of force, it was definitely de minimis because there was no period of permanent injury resulting from that. Thank you, Your Honors.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Studio Transportation Drivers v. Entertainment Media Specialist

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2011

    First, they admit they were writing from a clean slate, so they really had no published decisions to follow. So what? You still have to convince us that the Supreme Court wouldn't follow it. … I believe it's three days, or it's a brief period of time. I believe it's three days or seven days. With the maximum amount of money the payroll company can advance? There is no maximum amount.

    34 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.