Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.36s
Oral argument — I4I v. Microsoft
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2009
You argue in favor of files, but with the exception of a few errant comments in the prosecution history, I see nothing in the patents to require separate files. … For over a three-year period from 2001 through 2004, there were dealings where the details of the I4I system were explained, where it was repeatedly explained, it was patented.
73 min of audioOral argument — Consol PACoalv.FederalMIne
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2019
That means it has to be the totality of circumstances within that 15-minute period. … The commenters during the Miner Act thought about an hour, thought about 30 minutes, and they said absolutely not.
68 min of audioOral argument — Intl Assn of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Trans v. Iowa Northern Railway Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022
The next case for argument is 21-2608 Northern Iowa International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers et al v. Iowa Northern Railway Company. Ms. Diehl-Gibbons? … The critical issue here is whether the parties are in a period where they must maintain the status quo or whether they are in a period where self-help is permissible.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hunsaker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2023
So for those reasons, I'd ask that you hold the district court clearly aired in opposing the manager's supervisor. I'd like to ask you a question about Roberts. … The act of recruitment, much like Czar recruited people to participate in the scheme, is an act of organizing, of organizing the criminal activity. So maybe there needed to be somebody.
25 min of audioOral argument — Wright v. Quinn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2008
He simply leaves the stand with the question hanging in the air. What did Mr. Wright tell you? In closing argument, the prosecutor then fills in the blank, and he says, Mr. … Instead, they simply picked facts from his counsel when he was still acting as his counsel, which counsel himself contradicts.
21 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ron Vaughn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2012
And I would just like to comment that that case is not analogous to the case at Barr. … I appreciate your comment. Sure.
42 min of audioOral argument — Genus Medical Technologies LLC v. FDA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
The product at issue here falls within the text of the drug definition in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and the 23 years. … The FDA couldn't change any of that without going through notice of comment rulemaking. So again, really the FDA, the authority the FDA is asserting here is extremely limited.
67 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Marks
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010
Then there were air tickets for Bill and Todd. So the majority of that is tuition as tuition, which was his obligation. I'm not saying it's not his obligation. … In addition, you'll note in Judge Marthein's opinion that she chooses to comment on his testimony about his lack of income from his corporation.
61 min of audioOral argument — MID CONTINENT NAIL CORP v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013
However, this brings us to the discussion had in the original investigation of the nails case during the period for scope comments when an importer came in and asked for, made the argument that its tool … Do you have any comment you'd like to make with respect to the validity, the relevance of any of those factors? Absolutely.
54 min of audioOral argument — Antonio Smith v. John Kind
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2024
We have nine written complaints from other inmates that the cells were blowing cold air. Defendants checked on Mr. Smith every 30 minutes. Mr. … He alleged that the next morning there was a comment made to him about how he enjoyed the cold night.
37 min of audioOral argument — Colacicco v. Apotex
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009
This was not subject to notice and comment. … At the time that that regulation was put forth and the amendments recommended, that was in 1989, it was a comment period.
117 min of audioOral argument — People v. Fiveash
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2014
in the Juvenile Court Act. … And the trial court did not air in granting defendant's motion to dismiss the charges since the state was unwilling to accept the transfer of the charges to juvenile court.
39 min of audioOral argument — Common Cause Rhode Island v. RI Republic Party
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2020
It can't give way unless the legislature acts. It can't give way unless the governor acts. … That's one of the reasons we have courts and one of the reasons we have cleanings like this is legislatures don't always act the way they should. Executives don't always act the way they should.
85 min of audioOral argument — Polansky v. Executive Health Resources
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020
None of that was aired on the record here, by the way. So I think these kinds of things. So it really, it really is the coffee and donuts provision. … So there's a clear logic and structure to the act and Mr. Posner and Mr.
72 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017
And what we have here is no clearly delineated acts. There is no pattern of repairs showing control in the landlord. … And I would like to comment on Goula briefly. In that case, it makes perfect sense why the landlord was held to retain control of enough of the stairway to be actionable.
33 min of audioOral argument — Brandon Hobbs v. Mark Hooks
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018
I'd like to conclude with a quick comment. You know the double-deference standard. You hear the usual gobbledygook from wardens. I'm not going to go into that. … Belli, we want to thank you in particular for your representation here under the Criminal Justice Act.
31 min of audioOral argument — North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. v. State of Nevada
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2026
That is, it's deemed approved after the passage of a certain time period unless they step in and take action. When that time period passes, it's legally deemed to be approved. … Off the top of my head, I believe the initial comment period was either 30 or 45 days. I think it's 45 days. And then we review comments and move from here.
110 min of audioOral argument — Dede Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Association
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2014
The standard for that act is not what, is not a generic outside appellate standard. … This is just a complete windfall for Portfolio to create money out of thin air. It shouldn't be allowed. It's the very kind of thing that the FDCPA was enacted to prevent.
34 min of audioOral argument — CANCER RESEARCH v. BARR LABS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2010
That second part is the answer to your question, Judge Prost, which is the public rights are not some amorphous rights in the air to have the patent end early. … And if their behavior was objectively unreasonable, then I submit there are thousands of patent prosecutors out there during that time period who are acting equally unreasonably because the evidence of
42 min of audioOral argument — Drivetrain v. Kozel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2019
What's your comment on that? Well, there is, as of the last report by Mr. Cozell, $1.7 million remaining in assets of the trust. … Yeah, and if I can comment on that a little bit.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.