Documents

Oral argument — In re Eatmon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2026

Was that act of not listing it fraudulently made? Your Honor, the court found so, and the court found so based on a determination of Mr. … So what do all those other bad acts establish as to the book, right?

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Murray

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

Every non-payment occurred when there was three pay periods, so it happened on the third pay period. … But it didn't always happen when there was a third pay period, because there were multiple instances over that six-year period where there were three pay periods.

Oral argument — Tara Sadler v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insuran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2009

What was the period of delay? I remember seeing somewhere it was 36 days. All of this panned out within 36 days. Am I misrecollecting, or is that correct? All right. … It's like if you're hurt and you can't clean your house, then you can get these services. Or if you're hurt and you can't work, then you get some wage loss.

Oral argument — Koehler v. The Packer Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016

This number that came out of thin air in terms of that time period was almost two years old. … It says after that period of, after that four-year period of time, here, I have it here.

Oral argument — Lisa Johnson v. Amazon.com Services LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

It required employees to show that there was a willfulness component to get a third year in the limitations period. … Air Method Control does a very nice job of evaluating and distinguishing how the Illinois hours worked compensability regulation is broader than what's in federal law.

Oral argument — Cano v. Continental Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2006

Judge Miller, the timetables are at a period of time outside of the relevant period of time that Ms. Kano should have, through the exercise of reasonable care, been discovered. … Frankly, I think when the court looks at that specific deposition testimony, the court will see that that number is pulled out of thin air. There's not a basis to say where that number comes from.

Oral argument — People of the State of Michigan v. DOE

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2026

There might be a need to act in the present, but there wouldn't be a need for everyone to act in all ways right now. … And the emergency arose when Virginia regulators ordered the power plant shutdown for violating air quality standards.

Oral argument — United States v. Wendell Hall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2017

Frankly, the air went out of the courtroom at that point. … Did the government act in bad faith? There's nothing in the record that shows that. Was it only a small part of the evidence? Yes, it was.

Oral argument — Keating Dental Arts, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

As narrow as you can get where I'm up in the air is on this language that says the exclusion applies to the trademark. … If they had stopped at the period, they put a period after the word rights and excluded the rest of paragraph of a sentence number seven, because it's a molecular bioproducts says that the exclusion applies

Oral argument — Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2017

It's blowing in the air. And then the uncle comes along and says, it's ours. So your view is that Petrohan was stuck with the... had to believe that you were right when you said it was yours. … It was outside of the statute of limitations whether it was at the beginning or the end of the time period in question.

Oral argument — Klimek v. Froman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2010

As a matter of law, it only lasts for a limited duration, the period of time that the developer owns the properties. … Do you wish to make any comments on the sanctions? I do not wish to make any comments on the sanctions that did not involve my clients. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Vasconcellos. Good morning.

Oral argument — CFPB v. Cashcall, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

I would note that at the beginning of our period, our claims cover, our claims began at the end of July of 2011. … So is it, I guess this kind of goes to the same thing, is it a futile effort to send it back down, or is it important that we say, hey, it was tier one for this period of time and tier two for this period

Oral argument — In re Marriage of McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2019

Judge Rosenbaum mentioned the spill tea, taking the train lift off of the bike, being silly in a drive-thru, lack of air conditioning. … As parents, you're not supposed to comment on dad's behavior. You're supposed to have somebody independent do that. Who other than Dr. Osgood is supposed to do that? She's an independent expert.

Oral argument — Hamilton Reserve Bank Ltd. v. The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2025

It's in the record that the bank was purchasing these bonds in a series of transactions over a period from late 2021 through early 2022. And then Sri Lanka defaulted in the middle of 2022. … I'm not sure I'm articulating that right because I'm not sure it makes sense, but I want you to at least be able to comment on that. Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Seng Xiong

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2018

Since 1981, General Vang Pao continued to raise monies during that period of time till his death for a purpose of returning to the homeland, to the highlands. … And then just one last comment on the Fifth Amendment, right? No defendant should be compelled to incriminate himself or to waive his defenses. The defendant, Appellant Mr.

Oral argument — Equicare Health, Inc. v. Varian Medical Systems Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2024

Well, number one, it's a very bad day for the arbitrator, because all of this gets aired, and so on. So they're things short of vacata that are consequences. But number two, mistakes happen. … Which — one last comment on the — just on the waiver issue, and then I'll reserve the rest of my time for rebuttal.

Oral argument — Yonas Fikre v. FBI

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018

My next question is, has the government ever said that it was incorrect, that he should not have been on the list for a certain period of time? No. Okay. … We have in Claim 13 taken on FISA directly and then the subsequent claims, the Stored Communications Act, Wiretap Act. However, they're all interlocking and actually...

Oral argument — Kramer v. Village of Round Lake Beach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

Both of those are non-Tort Immunity Act cases that involve the common law definition. You can find plenty of cases out there from that period of time earlier that use the word reckless. … Obviously, the court gets to consider some facts, but the comments to it say you can't try. There's a disputed question.

Oral argument — City of Pontiac v. Schimmel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2014

At the end of that two-year budgetary period under the Act, then what happens to this so-called temporary reduction? Do you know? … The question of the time period of these modifications is it's indefinite and it's clear because these orders do not contain time limitations within them and PA4 and PA436 subject the period of receivership

Oral argument — United National Insurance. v. Faure Brothers Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2011

The warehouse worker, as air products charged, was careless and negligent in making this mistake here. And the underlying complaint never alleged that this was intentional or non- or intentional. … The courts have looked to the consequences, not the mental state of the act.