Documents

Oral argument — People v. Wallace

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Charles Wallace has always had those rights, and when he invoked them during the Miranda Act, they should have been respected. … But in questioning whether or not the file was suppressed in the first place, no, because that question mark is in the air and it could have been dispositive of this case.

Oral argument — Rita Boucher v. AGRI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2018

That's defined as plants growing in water or in a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. Correct. … My understanding of federal law is that if these farms were sold, to be developed as real estate, then there would have to be a separate determination under the Clean Water Act. Okay, thank you.

Oral argument — Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co. v. Flexsys America LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2010

The Ninth Circuit said that act, that act of injuring that one doctor, was co-equal to competitive injury. … Well, that doesn't give you a clean bill of health for life.

Oral argument — Colon de Mejias v. Malloy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 20, 2019

So there's a plan that is adopted and has to be approved, at least as far as the clean energy fund, by the commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection. … But what they did is in Public Act 17-2 and then 1881, they amended the statutes.

Oral argument — American Hospital Association v. Alex Azar, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2019

The adjustment, so, you know, there's, of course, Congress isn't just pulling out a thin air. … So, all right, so 9a, periodic review.

Oral argument — Sentry Insurance Mutual Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

So a cleaning lady comes in at night, and she has her vacuum cleaner with her. She doesn't speak any English and doesn't understand what that machine is, and she needs to plug in her vacuum cleaner. … It's whether the lower court acted arbitrarily and exceeded the bounds of reason in its ruling, which I think, quite clearly, the lower court did not.

Oral argument — Van Der Hooning v. Board of Trustees of University of IL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012

I mean, I have to, I mean, listen, but not without comment. Not without comment, Mr. Cifanelli. I fully understand Your Honor's concerns. … It shows that this Court understands, just like the Court of Claims, just like the Circuit Court, that the defendants here are using this 2009 amendment to the Whistleblower Act to delay Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Knox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2022

I still don't think he prevails on plain air review given that there's no authority saying that anywhere and it's not a direct application of Nassir given the difference in the language of the provisions … I hope that the Senate will act on that. And so hopefully sometime this year we'll have a Sentencing Commission. And there's no doubt that this will be one of the first issues.

Oral argument — Stiegman v. Stiegman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

At the time she married him, he was based in England at an Air Force base. Shortly thereafter, he had been based in the Crestview, Florida area. … So they were, they hadn't spent a lot of time together over the three years period of time.

Oral argument — People v. Ware

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2020

Ware testified that he was acting in self-defense after Phillips tried to strike him in the face with a dirty toilet brush. … You claim in your brief, quote, a defendant cannot raise the affirmative defense to an act that he entirely denies committing, end quote.

Oral argument — People v. Bowens

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2010

So we have to go to the plain air rule, and the plain air rule doesn't admit to any prejudice here because how does this hurt him? How does this go to an essential point? … shows that it is a deliberate act.

Oral argument — MRL Development v. Whitecap Investment

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2015

And I believe that Judge Gomez's opinion did an excellent job of talking about the history of the discovery rule and did a very, very, very clean analysis on what are the distinctions and what was the … The Deceptive Trade Practices Act, that's on appeal. However, as to my clients. What is on appeal? The Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim. Right, yes.

Oral argument — Martin Rooney v. Sierra Pacific Windows

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2013

There is not a warranty relating to the structural performance, air filtration, or water penetration. … How long did the litigation, the discovery period, go on up until the point that you that time did not include a Magnuson-Moss Act claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Giwa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

There was a housekeeper who had come in on October 8th, and the box was there and then cleaned up. … The police and the law enforcement agents were acting on the law at the time.

Oral argument — Citizens for Lightford v. Illinois State Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2012

See, we can't come out of the air. … That's the Campaign Disclosure Act. They are both interrelated.

Oral argument — Newkirk v. Superintendent Huntington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2023

As we're told, the building has finally decided to put some filters on the air coming into the building. This should be a great assurance to everybody in the room. … Well, I agree with Judge Jordan's comment that if the entire underlying controversy is moot, then that sort of procedural relief is also moot.

Oral argument — McMillan v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2016

When employees engage in protected activity, they go on leave under the Family Medical Leave Act. … Walsh didn't run it through his chain, and Walsh never got punished for either of those acts. Right.

Oral argument — United States v. Don Ellingford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2012

The very act of choosing not to do that, of continuing to add more drugs to this box, when they had a valid way to do it, is an act that cannot be done for any legitimate purpose. … And so that's why the disclosure of this information at a time period where the defense could have made use of it, so they could ask him these important questions.

Oral argument — Miyagi v. Dean Transportation, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2019

So there was a four-year period of time. Yes. During that four-year period of time, the plaintiff sustained $300,000 in medical expense. Is that correct? That's correct. … I don't know where they get this number, but let's just not act. It's probably $500 a week or a month.

Oral argument — Markley v. U.S. Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2022

They did not do anything beyond look at the report and decide whether to act. Is that correct? That is what they had, Your Honor. Okay. All right. … Pretext doesn't exist in the air. It's not pretext plus to say pretext for age discrimination. It's simply pretext. What if Mr.