Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Oral argument — People v. Massey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2025
into three or five and then it gets narrower as that goes on thank you okay so so so given this background and especially given the heinous offense it was especially important that the sentencing be clean … because it happened in a split second but under these circumstances where the assault at issue took place over the course of a long period of time that is time where the defendant's impulsivity did not
30 min of audioOral argument — Inner Quest Inc. v. Young Life Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018
InterQuest had cleaned up and walked away months before. … So the district court's language of the Wrongful Act flowing through the non-faulting party, was that your language? No, absolutely not.
36 min of audioOral argument — Torres-Pagan v. Berryhill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2018
The ALJ made a decision through the entire period of disability that goes up to the date when he makes a decision. … I'm representing the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and the Court should affirm the Commissioner's decision finding that Mr.
41 min of audioOral argument — Zuber v. APC Natchiq, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005
The Fair Labor Standards Act was designed to extend the frontiers of social progress by ensuring to all our able-bodied working men and women that fairs day pay for fair day's work. … The period of time of our suit is about a year and a half, two and a half years.
41 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2006
We should act as if that doesn't exist. … We're not sort of doing this on a clean slate. How are we to review what a deciding official decides if we don't know what he would have decided? Put it this way.
40 min of audioOral argument — Aucar v. Carle Health Care Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017
That's pursuant to air safety versus teacher realty court. In this case, the trial court did precisely that. … I don't believe that was the expectation of the parties, that they were going to act in their sole interest.
40 min of audioOral argument — MID CONTINENT NAIL CORP v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013
However, this brings us to the discussion had in the original investigation of the nails case during the period for scope comments when an importer came in and asked for, made the argument that its tool … Do you have any comment you'd like to make with respect to the validity, the relevance of any of those factors? Absolutely.
54 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Don Ellingford
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2012
The very act of choosing not to do that, of continuing to add more drugs to this box, when they had a valid way to do it, is an act that cannot be done for any legitimate purpose. … And so that's why the disclosure of this information at a time period where the defense could have made use of it, so they could ask him these important questions.
20 min of audioOral argument — Carol Clendening v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021
In fact, in many of the cases before this circuit, a discovery period has been granted. … So it's not for the Air Force, not Army.
36 min of audioOral argument — Intl Assn of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Trans v. Iowa Northern Railway Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022
The next case for argument is 21-2608 Northern Iowa International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers et al v. Iowa Northern Railway Company. Ms. Diehl-Gibbons? … The critical issue here is whether the parties are in a period where they must maintain the status quo or whether they are in a period where self-help is permissible.
35 min of audioOral argument — Hage v. Kossier
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2018
And that, as a lawyer, and from a cleaning standpoint, as knowing when I'm going to get sued, that makes it difficult for me because there isn't direct testimony that essentially says, Ms. … If it relates to the same act, correct? That's correct. Right. So, I mean, that's the key. That's really the nexus is, is this all one big transaction?
37 min of audioOral argument — Gross v. GFI Group, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019
And the stock would continue to trade during the interim period. And under AUSA Life Insurance v. … The price went to over $6 because the market at that point understood that there was undervaluation and the comments that BGC made about that discount.
28 min of audioOral argument — Gross v. GFI Group, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019
And the stock would continue to trade during the interim period. And under AUSA Life Insurance v. … The price went to over $6 because the market at that point understood that there was undervaluation and the comments that BGC made about that discount.
28 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2022
Does it all vanish into thin air the way your colleague perhaps thinks? … But I implore the court to actually look at the comments themselves, because that's not what NRDC said in the comments. The comments are at RCER 47 to 49.
87 min of audioOral argument — Saji v. Nassau University Medi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2018
Even if we were to conclude, or as the district court concluded, that wasn't a discriminatory act. … Did you make a discriminatory comment? No, I did not. That's still a matter of intent that is a question for a jury to assess credibility.
26 min of audioOral argument — Ken Blair v. Bethel School District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2009
Well, let's clean it up. … It goes back to your comments. Don't they have rights to have a leadership that reflects the majority viewpoint?
24 min of audioOral argument — Royal v. Latrobe
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Let me say in Part 4, Royal does not admit that it acted unreasonably. What does that mean? Let me try to explain, Your Honor. … What the District Court did do, it made two comments to justify its contrary holding.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2005
And that's precisely what occurred before the Sentencing Reform Act. This was a pre-Sentencing Reform Act sentencing. And that's not the scheme that we're operating under today. … The district court basically said, forget the Sentencing Reform Act of 19. What was it, 86? 83, Your Honor. That's right. And we're just going to go back to pre-sentencing reform act law.
17 min of audioOral argument — Ross v. Warden Francisco Pineda
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013
Were you told not to tell about the drugs or the sex acts? A little bit more specific. The boy answered, no. There was an objection. It was overruled. … I mean, there's some indication that there, the part about the anal sex didn't come out of the air.
42 min of audioOral argument — CANCER RESEARCH v. BARR LABS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2010
That second part is the answer to your question, Judge Prost, which is the public rights are not some amorphous rights in the air to have the patent end early. … And if their behavior was objectively unreasonable, then I submit there are thousands of patent prosecutors out there during that time period who are acting equally unreasonably because the evidence of
42 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.