Documents

Oral argument — Gross v. GFI Group, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

And the stock would continue to trade during the interim period. And under AUSA Life Insurance v. … The price went to over $6 because the market at that point understood that there was undervaluation and the comments that BGC made about that discount.

Oral argument — Gross v. GFI Group, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

And the stock would continue to trade during the interim period. And under AUSA Life Insurance v. … The price went to over $6 because the market at that point understood that there was undervaluation and the comments that BGC made about that discount.

Oral argument — Erie Insurance Exchange v. Maryland Insurance Administration

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2024

The first is the air EVAC case. This is in extraordinary circumstances, which I know, Judge Gregory, you didn't write, but you were on the panel in that case. … We would give them comments confidentially. If we couldn't agree, we would have a confidential hearing.

Oral argument — First Student, Inc., A Division of First Group America v. National Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

A bargaining obligation in the air. If you had reached an agreement with the union on March 2nd, you would have violated 8.82 because you wouldn't have known whether you had a majority or not. … But the importance in terms of reliance there, this is a period of time where a contract is being negotiated.

Oral argument — People v. Rebecca

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2011

That is that he engaged in oral sex acts with underage complainant. … didn't occur until the So there's evidence that shows that he was acting as a babysitter, evidence that shows he was not acting as a babysitter, evidence that shows the sex acts occurred while he was

Oral argument — Hage v. Kossier

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2018

And that, as a lawyer, and from a cleaning standpoint, as knowing when I'm going to get sued, that makes it difficult for me because there isn't direct testimony that essentially says, Ms. … If it relates to the same act, correct? That's correct. Right. So, I mean, that's the key. That's really the nexus is, is this all one big transaction?

Oral argument — MacDonald v. Grace Church Seattle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2006

She complained to what was a retaliatory act? A discharge. A discharge. Yes. … It finds a clean and compelling reason to grant the dismissal without even getting into the constitutional issue. Well, I guess then going – but let's – okay, you've given us that.

Oral argument — Metz v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2006

Well, because to get to a conclusion that the Military Pay Act, the underlying act that provides us with the ability to be before the federal court of claims, we have to be able to show that there is an … Skogerby testified at length in her testimony as to what was available during that period of time. That was part of the evidentiary hearing. Her testimony commences at a I think 195.

Oral argument — Saji v. Nassau University Medi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2018

Even if we were to conclude, or as the district court concluded, that wasn't a discriminatory act. … Did you make a discriminatory comment? No, I did not. That's still a matter of intent that is a question for a jury to assess credibility.

Oral argument — Ken Blair v. Bethel School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2009

Well, let's clean it up. … It goes back to your comments. Don't they have rights to have a leadership that reflects the majority viewpoint?

Oral argument — Royal v. Latrobe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Let me say in Part 4, Royal does not admit that it acted unreasonably. What does that mean? Let me try to explain, Your Honor. … What the District Court did do, it made two comments to justify its contrary holding.

Oral argument — Terrance Cabalce v. VSE Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

And there's a propellant charge that pushes the firework up into the air. They were cutting open those cardboard tubes, separating out the black powder into separate containers. … I believe that the third iteration was that the materials were dismantled there at the storage facility, soaking occurred, and it was still part of the original plan that the soaking occurred after a period

Oral argument — United States v. Tignor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

Now that we're off the clock, it's a good idea for oral advocates, when they hit a period in a sentence, to pause before they start the next sentence. Thank you. … Also getting to Judge Lucero's point briefly on the fourth prong of plain air review, Trujillo also held that a defendant cannot satisfy the fourth prong of plain air review where the evidence is overwhelming

Oral argument — Tobar v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2023

Was there any indication that that's how the I.J. was acting, or was the I.J. just trying to find out, like when we're talking about a long time, what does long mean? … Well, Your Honor, the IJ did specifically state that, I already read that, again, this court will use this to show that a significant period, to show that this is a significant period of time, referring

Oral argument — People v. Zeas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020

She's not acting seductively. She's not disrobing. She's not acting in any other sexual manner. … sex act, as long as it's a lewd act itself.

Oral argument — 03-35596 Evergreen International Airlines v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2005

factual subject area That is inconsistent with the only Uncontroverted evidence in the record He then goes on Again, similarly, in the delegation issue And he says Those folks, last airlines et al Will not act … Well Congress Was concerned about Promoting safety And one Part 121 Has more Carrier requirements Than the part 135 So the part 121 is directly Related to one of The purposes Namely the safety Of the air

Oral argument — PSSI v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021

And third, that petitioner was entitled to benefits under the act. … He's cleaning a cheese machine.

Oral argument — Leroy Holsey v. William Knipp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2016

So what's wrong, what makes that an unreasonable finding of the act by the state court? … Your Honor, regarding counsel's comment that the violation in this case was intentional, that is not in the state court record.

Oral argument — Amy Sullivan v. Flora, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2019

And we think that the judge's ruling was contrary to the Copyright Act, and it's actually the Copyright Act. So in the Copyright Act, in Section 504C, Congress was very narrow with statutory damages. … Because if you look at how Section 101 defines a collective work, in any case, that's a periodical, anthology, encyclopedia, those types of things.

Oral argument — United States v. Anahi Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

His wrongful acts were elsewhere. The narcotics trafficking was a wrongful act, but that didn't serve to induce people to do what they did with the properties. … I'd like to comment briefly about the constructive trust argument that, first of all, there was no wrongful act.