Documents

Oral argument — Morgan v. Chapman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2026

Judge Wilson, I appreciate your comments, but it doesn't do pain management at all. There's nothing in the newspaper article that suggests... I know you say that, but that's not the point. … They're charging, the charge is a violation of the Texas Medical Practice Act.

Oral argument — In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

If the court was writing on a clean slate, we would think that we should be present. The appellant should have been present at the initial question. … But in this case, we have ongoing representation by an attorney over a period of years.

Oral argument — Indirect Purchaser v. Toshiba Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

However, when those settlements were approved in the middle of 2020, the district court opened, reopened the claims period. … And in consultation with some of these firms, I didn't just make this decision out of thin air. We kicked it around. We talked about it. We said what's fair here.

Oral argument — Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2012

Period. … The reason they are not saying that they want to make a covenant of the — a copy of the Air Force One is that they don't want to make a copy of the Air Force One.

Oral argument — United States v. Rogelio Ramos, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2019

I know, for me anyway, yesterday was a challenge with the air and air travel. Hopefully everyone made it and ready to go. … But then you can't consider them, period, end of story. You can't have it both ways.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Zamudio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2019

It was during that 11 year period, and if I recall correctly it was the year 2004 and 2008 where he had made two payments. … But the 48 months that's attributed to the military service belongs to Frank Ochoa, who served honorably at a NATO Air Force base in West Germany during that period of time.

Oral argument — Dulyan v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2005

Well, the presumption of regularity supports the notion that official acts taken by public officials is the presumption of regularity here. … It matters a lot whether the person or the two people came in in 1989 because they need a 10 year qualifying period here.

Oral argument — LMK Technologies, LLC v. BLD Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

And so when you couple those together, when you have this long period where people skilled in the art are not aware of, are not appreciating, have not recognized that problem, that is where the lapse of … Just to the elbow. ...to that pipe juncture, which you're referring to as the elbow, to provide a discrete hydrophilic band there, which happens to act as a multi-directional water stop.

Oral argument — United States v. Dmitry Fomichev

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2017

And she said, okay, I want to come clean. Yeah, so everything... Sounds to me like she was participating. … But your position is that if the entrance to the ceremony is valid, period. Until and unless they have taken steps to terminate that marriage. Right. It can terminate at the back end.

Oral argument — Zhi Wang v. City of Pleasanton

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011

Comcast is a franchise provider of services in Pleasanton and, as such, is entitled to install cable in compatible easements by the Federal Cable Act, by the California Government Code, Section 53066, … On the other hand, I think that they've acknowledged that they want to make sure that they treat you as good neighbors and clean up.

Oral argument — Elena Livenson v. Aeronautical Radio, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

She simply says, a leader gets respect by his or her acts. And then just a third example for the court. There's an instance where Ms. … She put her on the project because she needed the code cleaned up and plaintiff was a good engineer.

Oral argument — City of Wheaton v. Morningside Wheaton, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2018

Once you take out the words, paid by the developer, and there's no argument here that the city attorney struck those as an act beyond his legal authority. … The comment was made that the city still doesn't know what's in this contract and still doesn't have the contract. Let's be clear on this also.

Oral argument — In Re Power Integrations, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

But that did affect how quickly the board acted on it because it was waiting to find out whether BRI was even still in play. But now, with respect. … I mean, that's just the whole problem here, is they're pulling this definition out of thin air. It's not required or mandated by the specification.

Oral argument — Murillo v. University of SF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2006

We've got a table A and we've got a series of B tables, which is not just pulled out of thin air. … Where is there any evidence in the record that, whether it's a seven-year period or a two-year period, whatever period it is, that on the one hand, when he hired him, Dean Williams was supportive of Professor

Oral argument — Arkansas Carpenters v. Bayer AG

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2008

, the only predicate act. … And the court said, well, if the only predicate act that's an unlawful act under RICO is what happened in the patent office, then we're going to hold it to be preempted. Thank you.

Oral argument — People v. Pinkett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2021

on the motion for a mistrial and again the prosecutor although he did comment that Mr. … to the persuasive um with with regards to the definition just to respond quickly about um the usual prosecutorial misconduct uh this court and people versus powell actually did hold um that the state aired

Oral argument — United States v. Davila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2013

And he didn't mention the magistrate's comments or any pressure he felt from those comments at all. … And he just believed that those allegations in the record would be cleaned up or have to be withdrawn by the prosecutor if he pleaded guilty.

Oral argument — Elizondo v. Dept. of Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

And the appellee, just one more comment on their creative interpretation of the phrase direct evidence, goes clearly against what the U.S. Supreme Court has, how the U.S. … Department of Air Force and Jones v.

Oral argument — United States v. Pedro Caraballo-Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

You have reserved five minutes and you'll have the full rebuttal period. Thank you, Your Honor. Good morning, Your Honor. Andrea Hoffman on behalf of the United States. … So then why wouldn't the comment about the rationale of Phillips extending to merits determinations on 3582C2 be strictly, oh, bitter dictum?

Oral argument — United States v. As

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

And part of the reason there's not a clean official act here is because of the pro bono nature of this. … Lorenzo was an ambassador for the entire period of the conspiracy, but he also was a special advisor to Mr. Ash.