Documents

Oral argument — Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2016

And comment C of 414 deals with that. And it says that's not the kind of control we're talking about here to impose liability. … So that's back to my negligence in the air. Had they looked further, which is what they said we should have done, we'd have found Kearney.

Oral argument — Flyers Rights Education Fund v. DOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019

Are you aware that under the APA, and this is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act, 555E requires the agency to give only a brief response in denying a petition for rulemaking. … And you can file comments, participate, or when the agency comes out with its final rule, you can seek a petition for review.

Oral argument — Naomi Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2021

And in fact, CMS in its interpreting comments has said the opposite. … And then CMS said, and this is in their 2005 comments, we continue to believe the generally applicable state tort contract or consumer protection law would not be preempted under the act.

Oral argument — United States v. Victor Ramirez Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

evidence at least for the five-year period of like sorry the five-month period from February to July? … Is that so that is that is not an active act by the DMV. It's an active act by Ramirez Correct, and I think that also go all the way to either one of your positions to decide this case.

Oral argument — SoundExchange, Inc. v. LOC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018

Because in the — in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1998, which is what kicked off these sort of proceedings, Congress drew a clean line between legacy services and new services. … what I understand were created out of thin air in phono records 1 and 2.

Oral argument — Dye v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2012

Why didn't the arbitrator make a comment and find this is a disfigurement? … It's not as clean as we'd like, certainly. But ask yourself, if they're asking me to affirm based on what, what shows that an opposite result is clearly apparent? And I don't see it.

Oral argument — Shalimar v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004

The prime minister's comment was to review the mandatory jurisdictional and, quote, are not subject to equitable calling. … Are they acting on the petition? Are they acting on the petition? I'm sorry? Is the AAU acting on this petition? No. How do you know? Because they rejected it.

Oral argument — Vasquez-Garcia v. Centurion

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2026

Second, under Fernandez, if the complaint pleads sufficient facts to demonstrate that the acts took place outside of the limitations period, the district court should and really must dismiss the complaint … Paragraph 46 is she saw the two air bubbles. Paragraphs 52 and 55, she's reporting that she had worsening vision and eye pain.

Oral argument — LaHaye v. Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2005

This is the only time that one of these went up in the air without the tie rod in it. … In this case, Israel Aircraft acted as the manufacturer of that part.

Oral argument — Harris v. University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2022

Well, certainly any fundamental right that's infringed upon is, for any small period of time, is irreparable harm. … So it's not always a clean distinction.

Oral argument — Oscar Munoz v. Nucor Steel Kankakee, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2021

It's not whether the defendant's exact act of negligence was reasonably foreseeable. … I just thought you had a brief period of rebuttal. I won't be very brief, Judge.

Oral argument — United States v. Matthew Hutcheson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2015

He had moved to Boise a little bit before the relevant time period for the charged conduct, and he was in charge of what totaled to just over $5 million worth of investment funds that when it came time … It was a fraudulent act to create a trial defense, and he was caught red-handed.

Oral argument — United States v. Ramon Beltran-Sandoval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

And I think an intent, a crime of violence, requires both an intent to do an act and an intent that this battery be committed. … And the record shows that in our case, the mother was working very long hours cleaning houses. On top of that, she was having to take her daughter to all of these appointments.

Oral argument — United States v. Benjamin Striplin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

And he says that he was kind of pointing it in the air, not directly at the victim, but that would probably be enough to say offensive use of a firearm. But it's not in the record. … Those people were imprisoned for a period of time, mentally ill were in asylums once we had asylums, but they could regain their rights. They weren't subject to the death penalty.

Oral argument — United States v. Nourian

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2026

In Thomas, the judge wanted him to come clean. … It wasn't the comment about Chris stepping out of meetings.

Oral argument — Guerrero Mariano v. Decker & Black v. Decker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2023

So are you suggesting we should infer from the failure to comment about any concern that there is no concern? … And for a very short period of time.

Oral argument — David Mazet v. Halliburton Company Long Term

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

the ability to work in his job what we're here today about is the disability policy that his employer Halliburton provided whether or not he is entitled to benefits beyond the own occupation two-year period … I mean it sort of it's up in the air you know it's it's you could argue that if you were on the other side equally you could argue both sides of that.

Oral argument — Port Authority Trans Hudson v. Sec US Dept Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2014

, governing the air, the aircraft, the airline industry. … It's an interesting case also because I didn't want it to seem an esoteric comment.

Oral argument — 03-35596 Evergreen International Airlines v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2005

factual subject area That is inconsistent with the only Uncontroverted evidence in the record He then goes on Again, similarly, in the delegation issue And he says Those folks, last airlines et al Will not act … Well Congress Was concerned about Promoting safety And one Part 121 Has more Carrier requirements Than the part 135 So the part 121 is directly Related to one of The purposes Namely the safety Of the air

Oral argument — United States v. McTiernan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008

That's what their argument is kind of like a harmless air down the road. That we'll still be able to get this in. … So at a minimum, there had to be a hearing before you could discard what McKeeran was saying and to just accept Carlton's comment as covering the subject.