Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Dreyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2015

But I guess I'm trying to focus on looking at the state of the law at the time that this agent acted or however many of his cohorts were acting in the same way. … Does the government get the message that whatever restrictions there are apply to the Navy as well as the Army and the Air Force?

Oral argument — Tikhonov v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2004

It wasn't that the immigration service came up with this document as the Court suggested out of thin air at the last minute and said, oh, by the way, here's some document. … I'm not sure how to comment on that, but – You know, they've got a conscience and they desert all that. All right.

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Collazo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2016

But when cross-examined, he admits, well, there really wasn't any construction area in this whole period. No signs of it, no construction, nothing. … During that time period, the Officer Hill and both Hill and Montgomery developed further information, the suspicious activity of Ms. Collazo, her movements.

Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

I mean, there might be different types of cancers, have different conditions with different implications, different periods of remission, recurrences. … But if the Secretary exceeds his or her authority, the Secretary is acting contrary to 1155, right? Correct. In excess of, and then thus, you have an unhinged executive, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Angelica Mendoza-Rubio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2026

And second, the District Court erred in determining that an incarceration period of 60 months was reasonable but no longer than necessary to comport with the goals of 18 U.S.C. 3553. … That is further evidence that the district court clearly aired here because the test is not whether one is essential, the test is not whether one has advanced education or skills, the test is whether one

Oral argument — Pogosyan v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2017

Oral replies are rarely given within the original response period. They're frequently scheduled after the response period has expired. That's the way I've seen it done for the last 15 years. … I've handled cases for Department of Homeland Security, Department of Treasury, Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense. Procedures are similar across the board that I've encountered.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Acevedo-Tolentino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019

And then, of course, under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, if there was any loss approximately caused by this offense, the District Court had statutory authority to impose restitution. … Under the clean slate doctrine, if an individual complies with several sets of requirements, he can have the 15-year registration period reduced to ten years.

Oral argument — In re: Stuart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2020

The creditor can say I'll wait for whatever period of time to figure out whether I'm going to get these attorney's fees. Well, there were no attorney's fees, Your Honor. That's a separate issue. … At Act 155, Your Honor, Mr. Stewart's counsel, Mr.

Oral argument — Martin Misjuns v. City of Lynchburg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

With regard to the transgender comments, again, I think we're on somewhat dangerous ground. We're in a very polarized world right now, Your Honor. … And any municipality would do what this municipality would, would do to clean up its act and communicate a simple message to the citizens of Lynchburg.

Oral argument — TENNISON v. BUTTERWORTH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2007

But, two, he's acting as a prosecutor in another case when he gets the information and discloses it. Yes. So it's not a clean case for any theory, I don't think. … It's very – it's very – it's not a clean case. Well, it's only mixed up because Tennyson and Goff were tried together.

Oral argument — Amy Sullivan v. Flora, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2019

And we think that the judge's ruling was contrary to the Copyright Act, and it's actually the Copyright Act. So in the Copyright Act, in Section 504C, Congress was very narrow with statutory damages. … Because if you look at how Section 101 defines a collective work, in any case, that's a periodical, anthology, encyclopedia, those types of things.

Oral argument — Mejia v. City of Sacramento

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2006

My reason is they should have never pointed guns to a nearly naked man with his hands in the air, palms facing outward, unanimous testimony by the police department. I mean, what did they think? … Mejia is that they were pointed at him for a period of about three or four seconds. What was his testimony?

Oral argument — National City Mortgage v. Bergman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2010

I want to focus in on Section 7 of the Mechanic Lien Act. … And the point is that this four-month period is not something that merchants pulled out of thin air. That was a requirement, or that is language that's contained in Section 7.

Oral argument — United States v. Davila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2013

And he didn't mention the magistrate's comments or any pressure he felt from those comments at all. … And he just believed that those allegations in the record would be cleaned up or have to be withdrawn by the prosecutor if he pleaded guilty.

Oral argument — Gilbert Herrera v. Terry Dishon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

I will also admit that during the course of the six months of hearings on the fee application and the lengthy period afterward that this Court did issue its Warner opinion. … So the first short period of time, the final. Okay. Other than what was submitted that Judge Bowen was not satisfied with.

Oral argument — People v. Treadwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2022

And, you know, there is a comment in the order that is regarding a pending murder trial without referring to which one or which ones, but are you, is there something that's like a partial suspension because … And the question is, you seem to be relying on the fact that there was a second attorney who cleaned things up but isn't.

Oral argument — Welch v. Welch

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2016

She relies on a home health care worker to help her with basic tasks like laundry and cleaning and personal grooming. She's unable to work. … So I think she pressed and she acted, and I don't mean to cross the line here, but she acted really an advocate for the appellate.

Oral argument — Alma Judith Jimenez v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2020

And the Board characterized that record as just random acts of violence. But this court said that was incorrect, not supported by substantial evidence. … It was enough for the IJ to make these comments about skipping the line and those comments in and of itself violated her right to proceedings before an unbiased adjudicator.

Oral argument — Daniel Larson v. Patrick Glebe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2011

There would be a 20-year period when Mr. Larson is completely ineligible for any earned early release time or any furlough or anything like that. That's not true of second-degree murder conviction. … Is this going to be a writ directing the state court to clean up its docket, to correct an error in a state court pleading or a ledger entry of some sort?

Oral argument — Beverly Truxel v. General Mills Sales, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2020

And I know that's a mouthful, but probable, significant portion, acting reasonably. I want to ask you a question. … And Judges White and Judges Alsup were not writing on clean slates with respect to the reasonable consumer standard.