Documents

Oral argument — 04-35210 Marceau v. Blackfeet Housing Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2007

Judge Ferguson, I'm having trouble hearing your comments. I don't know how your mic is set up. All right. How's that? That's perfect. Okay. … Henry Dodd, the proponent of the General Allotment Act, stated that housing was a central element of the act.

Oral argument — Smith v. Ace Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2009

They look at Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act. And they say, the court has ubiquitously said, since Greenlee, Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act has expressed the intent of Congress. … So why isn't that sufficient so that they could clean it up all at one time? That, I think, is the real issue you have to deal with. Well, let me try to address that head on.

Oral argument — BRODERICK v. PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2006

The response by PHP, which PWC reviewed because the SEC comment letters were critical matters, as was the Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey accounting, I might add. … We're talking about an auditor that said we have a concern, after it issued a clean audit opinion, about the decision-making process and the timeliness of reporting.

Oral argument — NicQuid v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

And I think as you said, the FDA has unquestionably violated that requirement in the Tobacco Control Act, which requires notice and comment, and to give an opportunity for all stakeholders, including manufacturers … That's not regulated by the Tobacco Control Act because it doesn't have nicotine. And nicotine in it. Nicotine would be the product.

Oral argument — Estate of Kendall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2018

Merz is going to address the duty issue, and we'll leave the comment issue with Ms. Holt, because we had resolved our matters with the comment. … The car of the defendant went up in the air, went through a brick wall and window, crashed down onto the plaintiff's decedent, killing them.

Oral argument — USAv.Gillette

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2013

DeRusso say here that there's a question, at least in his mind, probably is in ours too, that the 1983 remedy against the territory is at least up in the air, even if it's prospective. … And the period of time in which Mr. DeRusso was representing Mr. Gillette was not that long, and when you signaled that you didn't think 2241 was the proper remedy, they moved to intervene.

Oral argument — Ulmer v. Campbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2025

So if I can kind of draw on the air, Your Honor. So I'm going to flip the property upside down just so that way I can start at the top. … It's not the beginning of the statutory period. It's the continuation of the statutory period.

Oral argument — The Fisher National Bank v. Miles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2013

They were within any period of redemption if they had been sold at a tax sale. Okay. … A trial court comment on that? Did not, no. Okay, go ahead.

Oral argument — Acdmy of Allergy v. Quest

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

all times during the period of the violation. … before the limitations period is the overt act a new specific act or word of refusal is required during the limitations period the idea true for all any trust cases for the limitations issue is is there

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Collazo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

And that doesn't amount to an affirmative act on his part to facilitate their activities. … Amador was acting as a secretary at the highest level of the Mexican mafia.

Oral argument — Perry v. H. J. Heinz Brands

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2021

Safe clean. Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the court. Mr. Perry had more than 10 years to make bona fide use of his matchup mark. … He produced receipts for 34 sales over a period of 10 years. None of them reflects a sale to a non-Louisiana resident.

Oral argument — CEAI Elmhurst Terrace, LLC v. Sanders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2023

As you can see from his authorities, he cites federal housing acts, the Illinois Whistleblower Act, solicitation of murder or criminal statute. … Look no further again than his final comments when he filed his motion to vacate in the hearing on April 11th. I want to leave the promises. In Mr.

Oral argument — A10 NETWORKS v. BROCADE COMM

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013

Well, you can track the Taiwan Patent Act. If I found, is the Taiwan Patent Act a public document? It is. … Period. Period. The ministry has a number of things that are all based on conditions. They're all conditions.

Oral argument — United States v. Alfred Jerry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2020

And when you look at the comments, they stated that they limited it, but as opposed to nonviolent threats. And one example they gave was injury to reputation. … The first of which is the air must be clear and clear or obvious and not subject to reasonable dispute.

Oral argument — Jeffrey Plaskett v. Ryan McCarthy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021

I mean, there's a final, if you will, interim final sanction amount, but isn't the amount of back pay still somewhat up in the air? I don't believe so. … Did it give you a specific time period though to do that? It did give a time period. And then contrary to opposing counsel's suggestion, it didn't put the burden on the Army to come back.

Oral argument — Kevin Stout v. FreeScore, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2013

FreeScore also represents that it can help potential customers quickly address incorrect information, and dragging down their credit scores, and help them to ensure that their credit report is clean. … But important, Your Honor, that was under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Oral argument — WALKER v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2012

The continuity is broken if after service you have a period when something didn't happen and it was as a result of an intervening cause. … If someone suffers hearing loss during the period of service, that's service-connected, correct? Under 3.303A. Yes.

Oral argument — Indemnity Insurance Company o v. Westfield Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

I cannot find an explanation for that in the record, but obviously our argument is that the parties acted as if, all the parties acted as if it was understood that the withdrawal was under all the policies … In other words, it was alleged a three-year period.

Oral argument — Batista v. Stewart Enterprises

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2004

He leaves it up in the air. In order for us to meaningfully respond to that and refute that, we have to cover our bases. He's not limiting it to just the employee handbook. … But I'd like to address also Judge Hugg's comment with respect to Kramer requiring an interpretation of provisions as opposed to a mere reference to.

Oral argument — Curtis Fauber v. Ronald Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2022

The other is what's essentially due process claim from the prosecutor's comments. … And so can you comment on the procedural default issue and how you see its relation to the rest of your claims?