Documents

Oral argument — Homav.American Express Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Bland conceded as much in his opening comments by saying that I think his comment was to the effect that Mohammed involved, you know, looking at the facts of that case. … I mean, there's a wealth of case law and comment, regulatory comment, about the need for banks to be able to operate in a uniform fashion nationally. And if you accept Mr.

Oral argument — Viehmeyer v. City of Santa Ana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2003

Well, are you referring to Rutherford and Betty Jones as a matter of failure to intervene or the acts of the officers themselves? … But the Doe time period already expired. That's true.

Oral argument — Photomedex, Inc. v. Irwin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2009

But for the period of time from 2003 until 2007, the representation was not that the FDA would approve this had they, in fact, submitted it. … So your argument is, okay, let's make this a clean case instead of the case we have in front of us, that it's quite clear that this device has never been submitted to the FDA for approval, there's never

Oral argument — CAMARENA v. SLADE

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2004

So the way this whole mechanism is structured, it's to make sure that the inmate completes his rehab in the way that he is clean and sober, he attends his group sessions. … Maybe they were – I'm not saying they were acting with bad motives, but the Supreme Court decided they weren't applying the law correctly, and now Mr. Cameron is going to fall in the St.

Oral argument — Susan Beiersdorfer v. Frank LaRose

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

In fact, I found in a footnote or a comment within the Schmidt decision that the Sixth Circuit noted that the district court actually was only looking at due process kinds of interests. … The sixth circuit found that that one word was a very substantial act of protected free speech.

Oral argument — Harreld v. Butler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

Well, isn't there an ordinance or some sort of city authority that they have put in place to clean up sort of the neighborhoods or help people who need help with these federal funds? … Well, my comment about the public duty rule not applying is that it was simply to state that the courts have recognized it as a protection in traditional government functions such as police and fire functions

Oral argument — United States v. James

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2025

justified at its inception and second whether the officer's subsequent actions were reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the stop in the first place here the district court aired … to my opponent's arguments about the the officers officers saying that they were quote killing time the record reflects that at the time that sergeant David made that statement he was referring to a period

Oral argument — Bass v. Cook County Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2015

Ira Blumen, who is the medical director of UCAN, the University of Chicago's Air Medical Network, and also acting as designee of UCH's EMS medical director, specifically authorized the participation of … But I suppose there is a section in the EMS Act that has EMS medical director immunity in it. So I have no further comments, and I rest on my arguments. Counsel, thank you.

Oral argument — Rondy's Inc. v. Tractor and Equipment Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

Well, the clean point that the Court made was that there was no concealment because that recommendation was right on the label. … They had to be replaced periodically. He had the manuals on board. He referred to them. And it was perfectly clear that the bearings were inspected and reused.

Oral argument — Smith v. Ace Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2009

They look at Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act. And they say, the court has ubiquitously said, since Greenlee, Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act has expressed the intent of Congress. … So why isn't that sufficient so that they could clean it up all at one time? That, I think, is the real issue you have to deal with. Well, let me try to address that head on.

Oral argument — United States v. USDC-CASF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

And since what they actually want is DACA to be still in effect, they're not challenging the rescission of DACA in the air. … But the second point I would say is that we think that there are strong arguments that even though the adoption of DACA required notice and comment, the rescission of DACA does not require notice and comment

Oral argument — Tolliver v. Sisto

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2007

And as Judge – and it was brought in habeas, and Judge Posner said that 2254D1, the standard of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, did not apply to such a proceeding. … If you took a clean slate and simply said, then Beggs and Sass and Irons had never come down. Okay. Could you be here today? I – the Attorney General might not have appealed.

Oral argument — Marinello v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

limiting interpretation, and obviously you talked about this in your brief, but I just want to give you an opportunity now to try to convince me, because right now I feel as though it comes out of thin air … So somebody — I — somebody offers to clean my gutters, and he says, $100 cash, $125 if you pay me by check. Is that a violation of this? No, not at all. Why not?

Oral argument — Malkandi v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008

Well, I believe one of her lines of defense is that you should credit him for coming clean as they characterize. I would not characterize it that way on his six years of past lies because... … Now let's go back a little bit to the travel facilitator comments that Mr. Peachy made. And to the testimony of Agent Marks and Agent Smalley, that Mr.

Oral argument — Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. Live Journal, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2016

I mean, a corporation doesn't just act. It's employees or it's agents. Human beings act. Agency law is the only body of law one can look to. There is no body of other law. … The stuff's clean. We can do whatever we want with it. That's the big issue before this court. You see, they don't want to be like YouTube because YouTube accepts anything and everything.

Oral argument — National Material Co., LLC v. The GSI Group, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

And it's the simple 5% interest calculation that is provided by the Interest Act. So that would that would be our request. … during that 2008-2009 period?

Oral argument — Barbara Webber v. Carolyn Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2016

This is David Burdette, representing the Acting Commissioner, Carolyn Colvin. It pleases the Court. Ms. Chuggin closed by referring to the prior standard. … Yes, when I was 14 to 25, I smoked marijuana, but since then I've been clean. Go to another doctor, do you have any history of drug abuse? Yeah, I was smoking it up until two years ago when I was 45.

Oral argument — Michael Coady v. Ernst & Young

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2014

that IndyMac had suffered losses in the third and fourth quarters but enjoyed profits in its second quarter, and IndyMac did not actually fall below the regulatory threshold until one month after the clean … Your Honor, we all lived through that period of time, and I think we all can recall how things changed very rapidly and in ways that perhaps none of us predicted.

Oral argument — Holden v. Wilson Management, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019

Were he acting as a landlord or was he acting in regard to his role as CRM? … And there's, so there's no inference that Bob's acting, excuse me, plaintiff says that there's an inference that Bob was acting on behalf of Wilson Management LLC.

Oral argument — Aurora Vasquez v. County of Santa Clara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2019

But we're talking about the time period shortly before the suicide. Yes, Your Honor. So Mr. Manstock testified. … Manstock did not act with deliberate indifference. He didn't act with reckless disregard toward Mr. Lozano's needs.