Documents

Oral argument — United States v. USDC-CASF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

And since what they actually want is DACA to be still in effect, they're not challenging the rescission of DACA in the air. … But the second point I would say is that we think that there are strong arguments that even though the adoption of DACA required notice and comment, the rescission of DACA does not require notice and comment

Oral argument — Jerry Fuentes v. Mario Spearman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2015

and deliberate before committing this act. … That goes back to my comment. There can't just be impulsivity in the air. The impulsiveness has to somehow have affected his decisions to commit the crime.

Oral argument — Barron v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2024

But it can arise from the affirmative act of opening the gate, where the gate's supposed to be closed. … The only information that's known in the summary judgment record was that the gate was left open for some indeterminate period of time.

Oral argument — Jonathan Burton v. Dr. G. Espino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2026

Do they give rise to a genuine issue of material fact with respect to whether he subjectively knew of, you know, sort of a substantial risk of serious harm and then acted with criminal recklessness in … Um, I do want to, Judge Leibowitz, as to your comment about, um, retaliation maybe being, you know, having some heartburn about that one.

Oral argument — C. W. v. Capistrano USD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2014

And I think, is that a productive comment? They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. They do. … Then there is a report at the end of the assessment period. And that's the January 5th report.

Oral argument — Edward Hernandez v. Dora Schriro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

Part of my problem is that this was resolved on summary judgment, and there are a lot of questions that seem to me are a little bit at least up in the air. … The uncontradicted evidence in the record, Your Honor, is that any period of darkness in the prison, any period of low light even in the prison, not just darkness, is a danger, is a risk.

Oral argument — Griffin v. Sheeran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

They're aligned in the sense that we both claim the same act of infringement. And we own different pieces of the infringed work. … I'll try to be brief, but I wanted to clean up a few things. So in no particular order, because I want to make sure I hit all of them. On page A7 of the record, you will see the docket . . .

Oral argument — Barbara Streit v. Metropolitan Casualty Insuran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

You know, if this is just so much hot air, you know, that there's this list of things that you don't have to cover, but you can actually make that list three times as long as you want. … And I think the one comment that I just will make is that in terms of what the legislature was thinking, I think Your Honors are correct that it's a stretch to assume that they made all these assumptions

Oral argument — Fru Shure v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023

Am I correct that we review the adverse credibility determination for clear air in the same way we would review actual findings for clear air? … owned a store, proof that her uncle had been killed, and then a translation of the documents, the medical documents from French into English, and she provided all of those things, and the judge did not comment

Oral argument — Tejwaniv.Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It's taking dirty money and making it clean. … Stanton is correct, the Board, the President of the Circuit, Brasino, precludes a new period from restarting.

Oral argument — Holden v. Wilson Management, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019

Were he acting as a landlord or was he acting in regard to his role as CRM? … And there's, so there's no inference that Bob's acting, excuse me, plaintiff says that there's an inference that Bob was acting on behalf of Wilson Management LLC.

Oral argument — United States v. Bo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2017

I'm a partner at Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, and I represent Kelvin Burden, pursuant to an appointment under the Criminal Justice Act. … And so those comments, I think, go to that.

Oral argument — 1-18-1665

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2021

Wouldn't that have cleaned up all these issues? I don't know why. … Well, we do look at the facts of the case, don't we, to determine whether or not the officers would act or did act reasonably? Yes. All right.

Oral argument — 2850 Grand Island Boulevard Op

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018

And those assignments are a clean slate when a person floats to a particular floor. There is no precedent with respect to where they need to go. … , if they were supervisors, they acted inappropriately.

Oral argument — People v. Tucker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

Either the state was acting in good faith or the state was acting in bad faith. There is no middle ground. … And all they have to say, dismiss the case and just wipe the slate clean and reset it from zero, only to bring the same charge with no new evidence and no new witnesses.

Oral argument — Kargle v. Sanders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2020

None of them identified a specific negligent act by anyone that caused this injury. They simply offered possibilities. … Can I just make one comment on the, uh, very briefly. Okay.

Oral argument — Donald Timm v. Goodyear Dunlop Tires North Am

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2019

When tires lose their air, they are subject to bead unseating. … DeRose commented that there are these gouges on the rim, which he uses to support his theory it unseated as it was upright traveling straight down the highway.

Oral argument — People

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

Whether Best Buy acted knowingly. And in light of the Lowe's decision. I think it makes sense to break down that scienter question. Into a pre-compliance alert. And a post-compliance alert period. … The federal false claims act. Versus the Illinois version. Is is a linguistic one. That the federal false claim act. Does not discuss. Does not mention audits. Whereas the false claims act.

Oral argument — People v. Jeffries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013

If you had submitted the instruction, it would have been air for the court to decline it. Yes. I see my time is up. Thank you, Your Honor. Oh, and I would request reversal and remand for a new trial. … The new IPI and the committee comments came out in 2011.

Oral argument — Admissions_Kubiak v. Canon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2017

So I know the court was no longer acting on it, but I didn't see anything on the docket to reflect that. Right. … I can't comment on that.