Documents

Oral argument — People v. Redmond

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2018

and I don't I know I don't think the court did air right I don't think the court near why wasn't the state allowed to argue it evidence that came in without objection right it was not well again at the … But just to touch back on the comment about the Lucas case in Williams the court found citing Lucas that the bare assertion of a way witness is not sufficient to establish gang membership however here

Oral argument — Donald Middlebrooks v. Tony Parker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2021

Well, were people in fact electrocuted or not during that time period? I do not believe so, Your Honor. So if there were executions during that time period, they were with pentobarbital? … Your Honor, at that point in time, the method of execution is not up in the air, it's established by law. I know, established by law.

Oral argument — United States v. Zayas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

It was an open-air playground, and it serves children. … Even Congress would not act that irrationally, would they?

Oral argument — Aurora Vasquez v. County of Santa Clara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2019

But we're talking about the time period shortly before the suicide. Yes, Your Honor. So Mr. Manstock testified. … Manstock did not act with deliberate indifference. He didn't act with reckless disregard toward Mr. Lozano's needs.

Oral argument — Entergy Arkansas, LLC v. Doyle Webb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

For example, Entergy Arkansas asked to recover this amount over a two-year period. There could be alternatively a one-year period or a three-year period. … The sales at issue here took place over the period, or the misallocation of costs took place during the 2000-2009 period.

Oral argument — BioPoint, Inc. v. Dickhaut

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2024

The vast majority, almost half the money from Vedanta, $500,000 was for people who clean rat cages. … Over a period of years, defendants intentionally misappropriated all aspects of Biopoint's information to build a competing business. Counsel, we're well aware of the record.

Oral argument — United States v. Raylin Richard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2018

no per se rule in this circuit that the victim, meaning the person who the child who's photographed or whose image is captured, has to sort of knowingly and affirmatively engage in any sort of sexual act … The last thing I'll mention is counsel made a comment about, well, we weren't sure which victim it was. The defendant would have received discovery by that time.

Oral argument — People v. Aldrige

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

So, I mean, were the officers acting reasonably based upon the timing is my question. I mean, were they really stopping and saying, oh, you know, he's upstairs? … There's this guy shooting it into the air. That's how they get the call. So wouldn't the public safety outweigh the privacy rights?

Oral argument — United States v. Akein Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

If he thinks the basis of it was fraudulent inducement, which is basically what he's arguing, then he should have moved to revoke the plea, period. Your Honor, I... … You can look to the government's intent here, and no one has said that the government acted in bad faith. That's correct.

Oral argument — Research Corp. v. Westport Ins. Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2008

Count 1 is for breach of contract, and that is a clean breach of contract claim. … Ruzzi's comment was that that would – that was not covered by the contract. It was just – it was conversion of technical information.

Oral argument — People v. Tucker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

Either the state was acting in good faith or the state was acting in bad faith. There is no middle ground. … And all they have to say, dismiss the case and just wipe the slate clean and reset it from zero, only to bring the same charge with no new evidence and no new witnesses.

Oral argument — 2850 Grand Island Boulevard Op

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018

And those assignments are a clean slate when a person floats to a particular floor. There is no precedent with respect to where they need to go. … , if they were supervisors, they acted inappropriately.

Oral argument — Eric Brant v. Schneider National Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2022

I wanna turn, if I could, to the Truth in Leasing Act claim, because I think that in some ways is the most complicated. … It could be a landscaper, it could be someone who's cleaning homes. You are an independent contractor. Doesn't that defeat the FLSA, period?

Oral argument — Fennell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

Halbach's comments, but that's not in the record in the court below. And that's very important to the plaintiff's case, as Judge Guido noted. … A party acting with clean hands in equity would bring their motion to the court promptly. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Do you have one more?

Oral argument — Adaeze Duncan v. International Markets Live

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

You cite to the act. Well, the act says if that you get a try it like you would go to a fact finder. … So we have established prejudice on that eight month time period before they finally decided to raise this and never once was it argued they needed more time.

Oral argument — Gardner v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2008

But secondly on the issue, the third issue, which was the claim for wrongful levy by Bethel Air Ministries, the church, the fact that they, in fact, their predecessor in title and themselves, in fact, … It also shows that they allowed a utility easement on the property during this time period. They provided a deed of trust to Farragut Mortgage Company during this time period.

Oral argument — Akeel & Valentine, PLC v. Edward Napleton

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2026

After airing in three important ways. First, by finding that a vague news article clearly established that Eddie Napleton had control of 37 specific dealerships. … The PPP program only operated for a short period of time. It was one program. It was administered by the SBA.

Oral argument — Carl Greene v. Railroad Retirement Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2017

After airing and calculating his benefits, the Board proceeded to send Mr. … in paragraph 3 of section 203F of the Social Security Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Maria Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

It's not talking about an act. It remanded on that issue. And when it's back to the Board of Immigration Appeals, it's going to be a fairly simple argument. … The first thing I would say is this is plain air review. So there has to be an error, which we would contend there's not, and it has to be plain.

Oral argument — Sasaki v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2014

The only other comment I would like to make is that there is discussion regarding the Metropolitan Water case, and in that case you affirmed the commission. … I think it's all one act of attempting to sit down. I don't think that, you know, we'd be quibbling over the specific words. We know what the instrumentality was. We know what the result was.