Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.25s
Oral argument — William Harloff v. Shawn Hatton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2018
And then he poured iced tea on her head because she was bleeding from self-inflicted wounds, and he was trying to clean her up. Correct. He slapped her to get her out of her rage. … She was offered the opportunity to say, isn't that a threatening act? And she said, no, I would not characterize that as a threatening act.
22 min of audioOral argument — Lagano v. Bergen County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014
If they find out there's true malfeasance here, their hands are going to be washed clean from any indemnification obligation. … I have not even seen a case going through the football analysis, you know, step by step in a relatively lengthy period of time.
30 min of audioOral argument — In Re: Sling Media Slingbox
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017
case they rely upon, there was something affirmatively done by the seller, 100% fat-free, total zero, two-year warranty, which gave the person a reasonable expectation that the product was clear and clean … Unless Your Honors have any additional questions, I'll conclude my comments. Thank you very much. Thank you both. We'll take the matter under
27 min of audioOral argument — Krugman v. DVA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016
He said, the HVAC system, which is being used to supply air to the offices upstairs and the sick people downstairs, is also being used for the surgery rooms. … There had to have been an intervening act. We suggest the intervening act with no disclosures. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. We thank all the parties for their arguments today.
24 min of audioOral argument — People v. Beard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2020
He would have to know that the tip was reliable and not just a rumor in order for him to act on it such that he can delay a stop under reason. Again, if that's the only thing. … The conversation between the two chiefs is 90 seconds and then it takes a period of time for the dog to arrive. In my case, during that time, he was still writing the citations.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Charles Armour
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015
So we still believe plein air is applicable to that condition because there was no objection to it, which is an easily anticipated objection. … We used your time, and I know you must have some comment that you'd like to advance at this time. You used my time productively, so I appreciate that.
28 min of audioOral argument — Theodore Bolick v. Joel Anderson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025
And then the other cell – Anything else in there to assist them to keep themselves clean? No, Your Honor, they were allowed – Toilet and sink, and then there were two bunks? Mm-hmm, yes. … Now, these were not the actions of men who were acting deliberately indifferent. Plaintiffs' unpublished cases are distinguishable. The court in Brown v.
51 min of audioOral argument — Jessica Syfco v. Encompass Indemnity Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2014
Niffler Construction was pro se until this appeal, and Niffler Construction has a clean record that's free of worksite death or injuries. … The reason we're here today is because OSHA compliance officers acted ultra-vires.
31 min of audioOral argument — Christina Jacobs v. NC Admin Office of the Courts
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014
Jacobs' claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and North Carolina Common Law. … Tucker had known about the email and had made comments. It just seems like the trial court believed Ms. Tucker and disbelieved the plaintiff.
41 min of audioOral argument — Goce Gligorov v. Nation of Brunei
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2025
It would be the rental records for the dates, specific dates and time periods identified in the declaration of Ronald Danette. … And that boils down to paragraph 37, which is there were meetings that were held at least one meeting in Bel air in some.
74 min of audioOral argument — People v. Othman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2018
You also have the inappropriate comment in closing by the prosecutor. Yes. You have many trial errors. … You have just what amounts to it's not a clean trial at all. And when the evidence is like this, matters should be remanded for resentencing.
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. George Naum, III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024
And it kind of shifted as to whether it was with a clean heart, if you will. I was doing, I was not putting the patients in a bad situation. … And to answer your question, Your Honor, this was a period of eight years. Dr. Naum worked part time at this clinic. Started out with 55 counts, 39 were severed.
58 min of audioOral argument — Mirabella v. Villard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2016
So it's your view that it cannot be a retaliatory act if all one is doing is complying with their legal requirement? Correct. And they're simply alerting Mr. … Mirabella that they had certain rights under Rule 1023.1 to seek sanctions if he filed a frivolous lawsuit, period. And if the same email was sent to a non-attorney, would you argue it the same?
32 min of audioOral argument — Griffin v. Sheeran
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019
They're aligned in the sense that we both claim the same act of infringement. And we own different pieces of the infringed work. … I'll try to be brief, but I wanted to clean up a few things. So in no particular order, because I want to make sure I hit all of them. On page A7 of the record, you will see the docket . . .
31 min of audioOral argument — H.B. Fuller Company v. International Insurance Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2014
If it's a fact finding, we'd have to say, is our review clear air? Or, I mean, everybody seems to argue this is more of a legal argument in how you interpret this. … In that case, the court said, the word accident encompasses both the acts of the insured and the consequences of the insured's acts.
44 min of audioOral argument — Ronald Kramer v. Mary Cullinan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017
Cullinan on notice that making comments about potential claims for breach of fiduciary duty, potential claims that he was not acting in the best interest of the university, what's listed in the NARA National … Those type of comments are more analogous to honesty and morality versus incompetency.
29 min of audioOral argument — National Biodiesel Board v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2016
It requires notice and comment, and I'll put an asterisk on that because I think it's very important to explain why notice and comment is necessary under the aggregate approach, but it also requires annual … Water Act was a rule.
45 min of audioOral argument — Slattery v. Cuomo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2021
So we have the comment about Hobby Lobby from Senator Metzger that you mentioned. That's part of legislative history. … If they had a policy that said we propose to violate section 203B, period, I incorporate by reference 203B, period. That's their policy. And no one has come forward. No one has written you a letter.
62 min of audioOral argument — Barbara Webber v. Carolyn Colvin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2016
This is David Burdette, representing the Acting Commissioner, Carolyn Colvin. It pleases the Court. Ms. Chuggin closed by referring to the prior standard. … Yes, when I was 14 to 25, I smoked marijuana, but since then I've been clean. Go to another doctor, do you have any history of drug abuse? Yeah, I was smoking it up until two years ago when I was 45.
35 min of audioOral argument — Michael Coady v. Ernst & Young
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2014
that IndyMac had suffered losses in the third and fourth quarters but enjoyed profits in its second quarter, and IndyMac did not actually fall below the regulatory threshold until one month after the clean … Your Honor, we all lived through that period of time, and I think we all can recall how things changed very rapidly and in ways that perhaps none of us predicted.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.