Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Oral argument — American Future Fund, Inc. v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2026

    Yes, and we were trying to get the district court to act on our P.I. on an expedited basis, so we... Right. … But they've like bought airtime for the ad to air on June 5th. We wouldn't be, the court would not be able to determine in that short time period whether you're right or wrong.

    66 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ali v. Ashcroft

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

    I don't really represent the Board of Immigration Appeals because the government, the executive branch, acts as a prosecutor, if you will, a litigant, a party before the Board of Immigration Appeals. … The only major difference, or the only difference, and I would submit it makes no substantive difference, is the replacement of semicolons with periods.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Dowie

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

    It was a momentary comment in rebuttal. Even if the Court finds that it was an improper comment by the prosecutor, it wasn't objected to at the time. … So it isn't that we've concocted this out of thin air. It's we didn't know it until Mr. Ahrens disclosed it publicly.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Periano v. County of Winnebago

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2018

    In honor of this case on the block, I move that Act Number 17 in the Ad Hoc Zero to be 6-8. … What happened here is they waited until 1158 and a 30-day filing period and motion to reconsider.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Bo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2017

    I'm a partner at Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, and I represent Kelvin Burden, pursuant to an appointment under the Criminal Justice Act. … And so those comments, I think, go to that.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Robert Kahre

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2012

    Three to five minutes, so I'll try to air it to give her five. Please proceed. May it please the Court, Counsel, Lori Carey, Alex Loglia, and Robert Carey. … Then he commented on the documents, calling them chump rules, and then said, Mr. Kennedy, you know what chump rule is? And I said, yes.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — PATTERSON v. OOC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

    But what is the protected act? … As far as this record is concerned, the AOC is as squeaky clean as it could possibly be. The other thing that rises is, Mr.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: Murphy-Brown, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2018

    I normally think of voluntary cessation as the acts of a party going forward, not the independent acts of a court. Well, I think there are two answers to that, Judge Agee. … So are you opposed to any order restricting comments on the case? I mean, what about...

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Arrendondo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020

    It's the combination of the two factors defendant being asleep so that he wouldn't be able to act and that the, the gun was behind the door. … Seated air in that. And then I think one of the. Later questions or comments is that, you know, they don't know whether. He thought. He thought. He thought. Improperly that that prohibited.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Harshad Shah

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2019

    It seems that entrapment is in the air this morning. … But to get back to the issue of racist comment, it is not the issue before this court, factual or legal. In fact, we conceded that Dr. Shah started the discussion about being from India both.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jody Hill v. Carolyn W. Colvin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2014

    The time period was a little bit shorter. They changed the alleged onset date, and there was some additional evidence at the end, and the ALJ redid it. … I would like to address his comments about law of the case as well.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Xyavier Calliste v. Xeng Lor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2025

    There's about a six second period of time between when the vehicle lurches towards and comes at the officers and the officers begin firing. … I'm not going to comment on that one way or the other because I don't think that's material. I think what's material . . . Well, you put it in your brief. That's what he testified to. Okay.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Pick

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2019

    We know that a period of time passed between the time of the 911 call and the arrival of the police and they were still there. Right. … And yet the court held that there was insufficient evidence of that, particularly because he had only been there for a very short period of time.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jihan, Inc. v. AMCO Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

    Based on fire scope and estimate, this includes the cleaning of the concrete walls and floors, replacement of the doors to the room, repairs to the ceiling, roof framing, and repairs to the roof, roofing … But we've been litigating this case for a long period of time based on the allegations in the complaint, and they aren't raising this issue now until an appeal.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — William Harloff v. Shawn Hatton

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2018

    And then he poured iced tea on her head because she was bleeding from self-inflicted wounds, and he was trying to clean her up. Correct. He slapped her to get her out of her rage. … She was offered the opportunity to say, isn't that a threatening act? And she said, no, I would not characterize that as a threatening act.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lagano v. Bergen County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

    If they find out there's true malfeasance here, their hands are going to be washed clean from any indemnification obligation. … I have not even seen a case going through the football analysis, you know, step by step in a relatively lengthy period of time.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re: Sling Media Slingbox

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

    case they rely upon, there was something affirmatively done by the seller, 100% fat-free, total zero, two-year warranty, which gave the person a reasonable expectation that the product was clear and clean … Unless Your Honors have any additional questions, I'll conclude my comments. Thank you very much. Thank you both. We'll take the matter under

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Beard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2020

    He would have to know that the tip was reliable and not just a rumor in order for him to act on it such that he can delay a stop under reason. Again, if that's the only thing. … The conversation between the two chiefs is 90 seconds and then it takes a period of time for the dog to arrive. In my case, during that time, he was still writing the citations.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Charles Armour

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015

    So we still believe plein air is applicable to that condition because there was no objection to it, which is an easily anticipated objection. … We used your time, and I know you must have some comment that you'd like to advance at this time. You used my time productively, so I appreciate that.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Theodore Bolick v. Joel Anderson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

    And then the other cell – Anything else in there to assist them to keep themselves clean? No, Your Honor, they were allowed – Toilet and sink, and then there were two bunks? Mm-hmm, yes. … Now, these were not the actions of men who were acting deliberately indifferent. Plaintiffs' unpublished cases are distinguishable. The court in Brown v.

    51 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.