Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Deshaun Tisdale Dangelo Davis Winston Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2020

understand that say the brick is thrown back at you do you get a self-defense instruction for initially throwing the brick at somebody well i would argue in this case with the time with a 15 minute time period … argument and or well it's really an ineffective assistance argument because it would be plain air so that's that's why i think we have this uh strong inertia in favor of waiting for the 2255 yes and and

Oral argument — Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2008

And, I mean, you might compare it, like, to the Equal Access to Justice Act. … Do you have any comment on the Johnson case? Well, I don't. I do. I don't. First of all, Johnson is an unpublished decision, and it's not presidential.

Oral argument — Steele-Warrick v. Microgenics Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024

And instead of acting on that immediately, like, listen, first I applaud them for eventually acting and doing the right thing. So that's a good thing. … But you – no reason to comment on it now. You'll have an opportunity to send us a letter.

Oral argument — Garrelts v. Honeywell International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2013

And the other was for a period of three or four months in late 1980 where Mrs. Geralds works in an office at Chinoot Air Force Base and is a bystander. … A comment that I thought in the Peewell case, Mr.

Oral argument — Duplan v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017

I Recognize that there's that there's a scheme, but I think that's The way that retaliation actions often happen over a pit over sometimes over a long period of time multiple acts of retaliation that it … Our argument is that the Civil Rights Act of 1991?

Oral argument — United States v. Clark

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

And the driver came up completely clean, and her information was readily obtainable through the dispatch and search on the computer. I believe we have two minutes left, Your Honor. … Whereas the key here, you're saying this just fits under Fernandez because he's just doing an officer safety check since he knows that he's going to be with that car for a period of time as he's writing

Oral argument — Wohlers v. Keith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2016

Isn't there something called the good or clean hands doctrine? Well, there is, but that applies to equity. This is a statutory issue because the Injunction Act is pretty clear. … For a period of time, you're right. That's what was happening here. So they must have been way off then. If it doesn't work, well, then we agreed.

Oral argument — VARDANYAN v. GONZALES

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2006

They're not bothering him because he's not fighting with them, and he most likely does not approve of the acts of the son or his wife, who's now in Russia. … And the unfortunate part is you do reach a period where, in the minds of a 20, 21-year-old, that's the range he's at when he left.

Oral argument — Sky Harbor Atlanta Northeast v. Affiliated FM Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2024

It entered because the HVAC was malfunctioning and creating a negative air pressure environment that drew in that humidity. That humidity then soaks the drywall. You've got to replace the drywall. … We can't be found to have acted unreasonably under that set of facts.

Oral argument — Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2011

I mean, don't we usually look when we're thinking about equitable doctrines as whether the defendant has clean hands? … There is no group activity, no notion that this acted in concert — or that they were acting in concert.

Oral argument — People v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

It's worth noting at the outset that these comments were not properly preserved and could be deemed winged unless the Court decides to – the defendant satisfies plain air review. … We know the prosecutors are a lot of wide latitude and can comment on any evidence that is fair and reasonable inference.

Oral argument — People v. Neal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2011

I thought it was over his head, but your understanding of the record was it was straight up in the air. … I think there was an act discharge filed on Mr. Mathis.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. Becerra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2023

Section 1395 of the Medicare Act prohibits the federal government from acting as supervising the practice of medicine. … So it certainly meets the lower threshold for requiring notice and comment on the Medicare Act, which is based on a substantive legal standard.

Oral argument — People v. Jenkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024

Finally, we're asking that this court vacate the conviction and sentence for count three under the one act, one crime rule. … I think that needs to go back for a new trial period on the first issue. And we have enough smoke of possible IAC. Certainly we have IAC in, in Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Teman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2023

Except as they may show, it's like a conspiracy and you have an overt act. And the overt act is in New York, but nothing else is. … Those are not the comments of an advocate. Those are the comments of the judge looking at the performance of this case. And I think… But he also found no ineffective assistance, right?

Oral argument — 02-30354 United States v. Glasgow, Duval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

Number one, because there was no objection, are you going to look at it in terms of plain air? If you are, where's the prejudice? There is none. Even the defendant's counsel concedes that. … We'll be more precise if that's the agreement we want to make, but that's how we have to act now. But pre-Quash, we were talking about Rule 35, 5K, sentence, whatever.

Oral argument — 02-30354 United States v. Glasgow, Duval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

Number one, because there was no objection, are you going to look at it in terms of plain air? If you are, where's the prejudice? There is none. Even the defendant's counsel concedes that. … But that's how we have to act now. But pre-Quash, we were talking about Rule 35, 5K, sentence, whatever.

Oral argument — Earth Island Institute v. Kevin Elliott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2019

You know that the comments by Earth Island were that that it's not the case and that the wildlife come back to an area if it's not if you don't take out all the logs. … And yet the government argues that in this very case there are cases that are the same issue and since air stayed a decision could be made on whether this E4 is applicable.

Oral argument — Chance Brumfield v. City Of Seattle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2013

Maybe another judge wouldn't have acted in the same way. … Meaning, if somebody's hand is flailing in the air, how can he say, was it down here, out here, where was he, and so forth?

Oral argument — Upson v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

And then she gives what I thought was undisputed testimony that when she's tapping him, she's listening for air pockets, whatever it is she describes. … His signs or his symptoms had only been going on for a short period of time. He gave testimony about her discounting his claims of pain.