Documents

Oral argument — San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper v. Santa Maria Valley Water Conse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2022

There, the project was modified quite extensively, in fact, to address the subsequent passage of the Clean Water Act. … Fish and Game commented on it. United States Fish and Wildlife commented on it. And everybody agreed at that point, before the circumstances had been changed, there should be no water for fish.

Oral argument — DairyAmerica, Inc. v. New York Marine and General In

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

During what period? It doesn't say what period. And that's the crucial issue. That clause never mentions a period of time. And that is controlled in every policy of insurance. … But the binder and I have a time period. And the policy and the binder have a time period. It's like imagine if you bought a collision policy for your car.

Oral argument — Forest Grove School District v. T.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

Let me cite some facts to you, and bear in mind that your scope of review here is for clear air, and you're suggesting maybe it's clear air. Yes. … I think that in the wording of the district court decision, he does consider both the period before and after August 26.

Oral argument — United States v. Samuel Navarrette-Aguilar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2015

reach the 1,000-gram threshold, or any weight threshold, if we were to expand this, necessary to establish a mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of a conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act … We have to remember that the con- Pick out a thousand grams out of the air. There had to be some evidence. Right. And they didn't, the evidence that they had was overwhelming.

Oral argument — Fennell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

Halbach's comments, but that's not in the record in the court below. And that's very important to the plaintiff's case, as Judge Guido noted. … A party acting with clean hands in equity would bring their motion to the court promptly. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Do you have one more?

Oral argument — Robyn Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2020

Mediation is explicitly promoted by the Federal Arbitration Act. … If she went to arbitration, the slate would be clean, and everything we did in that arbitration would be done for the first time.

Oral argument — Brian McCoy v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2019

I mean, I don't know if it's technically ongoing, but the the elements are met at different periods of time. That's correct. … So the remedy in this case would be pretty clean. Just vacate the 924C conviction. What about the absurdity of saying what he did is not a crime of violence?

Oral argument — Tejwaniv.Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It's taking dirty money and making it clean. … Stanton is correct, the Board, the President of the Circuit, Brasino, precludes a new period from restarting.

Oral argument — Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. v. Adam Soczynski

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2014

Hipp and Hipp's Trucking were acting under the authority of ATS, Airplane Transportation Services, the Great West insured here. … I've already commented that I believe that the trial judge was within his purview to say there have to really be genuine issues of fact here, and there really aren't.

Oral argument — Emera Maine v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

And that is that Section 206 of the Federal Power Act requires a two-step process. … That one was covering a period a couple years before, and then in the Seaway case decided after this one, that relied on a study period that overlapped the one here.

Oral argument — Oklahoma Firefighters Pension v. Finisar Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

Your Honor, all it says is that there was discussions over a three-month period of time. This is dynamic time period. The discussions are not finalized until December. … They don't have the air of suspicion in context.

Oral argument — Peter Crane v. United States Nuclear Regulato

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2009

It was suggested by comments in this proceeding. … To the question, there is no basis under the Hobbs Act review for making a factual record. The record comes up from the agency. Mr. Crane is a thyroid cancer patient.

Oral argument — Illinois Insurance Guaranty F v. Xavier Becerra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2021

This case involves the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, or the MSP, and specifically whether the fund falls within the statutory definition of an applicable plan such that the fund has to submit periodic … My question is whether the government is telling us that that's a sufficient forum to air this issue out and have it decided.

Oral argument — In Re Jefferson Parish

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2023

And so, but do you want to comment on that? I beg to differ. I think the record is clear that in January of 2019, we were pressing to have certification decided first. … The limitations period would still be held open.

Oral argument — Seth Nibert v. John C Ruiz Bueno III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

Your defendants say that they saw him during that time period. And essentially the doctor seems to be saying that anybody that saw him during that period would have noticed that. … Do you want to comment on that? Well, yes, I do. I mean, my view is this.

Oral argument — Agere Sys Incetal v. Ad v. En v. Tech Corpetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

Well, that's an interesting comment because if you read the opinion, which I'm sure you did, they had a 113 counterclaim. … So any other person means any other person, period. And as Your Honor pointed out in talking to Mr.

Oral argument — Silicon Graphics v. ATI Technologies

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009

And again, it's section 2.4 of the license that they asserted in the Microsoft, which immunized acts when a combination product was found to infringe the 327 patent. … So all of those comments do not relate to scan conversion.

Oral argument — Garrelts v. Honeywell International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2013

And the other was for a period of three or four months in late 1980 where Mrs. Geralds works in an office at Chinoot Air Force Base and is a bystander. … A comment that I thought in the Peewell case, Mr.

Oral argument — Adaeze Duncan v. International Markets Live

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

You cite to the act. Well, the act says if that you get a try it like you would go to a fact finder. … So we have established prejudice on that eight month time period before they finally decided to raise this and never once was it argued they needed more time.

Oral argument — Lavigne v. Great Salt Bay Community School Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

She only discovered this when she was helping her child clean the child's room in preparation for a winter painting project. You just said day-by-day, there were day-by-day instances. … What about that makes it more plausible that before the social worker acted, there was some concerted custom or policy that had been actually developed, as opposed to the social worker just making a decision