Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.16s

  • Oral argument — Yaakov Markel v. Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

    That the eating of kosher food may be a religious act. … He's cleaning vats. He's moving things from one place to another. He's changing out hoses. There is no congregation. There's no every day.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. HOWARD

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004

    But we- but we- and we did put in information from chief deputy and then acting Marshal Mositis as to this issue. … With respect to a point, Judge Schroeder, that you made, I think our position, of course, is you can't have a general policy, period. It has to be defendant-specific.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Williams

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

    getting into all these issues about filing late and the civil correspondence with the IRS about civil penalties, it does seem that that would confuse—I mean, I would actually think you'd want to put on a clean … Williams' personal involvement over this decade period with the IRS, you know, about his tax issues, the jury hears that, right? And they're able to, it's almost a rule of completeness problem.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jason Gowen v. Gerald Winfield

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024

    Not only was it much closer in time, but there was a specific act that showed up. What about the ringleader comment? So you want to be a ringleader, huh? We've got a place for ringleaders. … It's not that I acted violent, it's because I complained.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pangilinan v. Holder

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2009

    I mean, it was never really you don't really have a clean hearing. That's my concern. Correct. … We filed within the statutory period for a motion to reopen, which is 90 days.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Palaca v. Gonzales

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2005

    They're just saying, on the merits of assuming credibility, he loses, boom, period. Yes, Your Honor. … And this is a ground we've been over before, but I don't have an answer that's quite clean. And you may or may not be in a position to give one.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Parker v. LeBlanc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2023

    Turner, it wasn't enough to have four cleaning tool incidents. The court said that those didn't create a pattern of violation that should have put the prison on notice for a sling blade incident. … And the people who lost qualified immunity were the people who knew and did not act for some period of time, a much shorter period of time than this. I see that I'm out of time. May I answer?

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Williams v. Wirth

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2019

    I don't believe that the judge's comments were made over the objection of plaintiff's counsel. … It's cited in the briefs, 2017 ILL Act I, 170537.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Aectra Refining v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

    They require claimants to complete their claims within a period of time. That period of time is within three years in the date of exportation. … So in reality, the prospective provision for the effective date allows claimants to look back three years from the 2004 Trade Act to amend or jiggle with claims that are within that three-year period.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

    One is whether the exhaustion of the administrative remedies requirement under the Prison Litigation Reform Act was completed by Mr. Merchant. … If I may start with the Prison Litigation Reform Act issue, I will then move on to the discovery and procedural sanction imposed by the district court.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sussex Financial Enterprises v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsban

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2011

    They amortized that over a period of 30 years. That extra cost comes down to about 0.23 percent. … I understand your defense is that they were they didn't come in with clean hands, that they were part of the fraud and so forth. But isn't our review pretty narrow in this case?

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Old Second National Bank v. Jafry

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2016

    Do they go in and clean up and add new cabinets and new bathrooms? I don't know, but can't that be set out at a hearing to determine what the deficiency is? … And if the bank, is it fair if the bank held the property, maintained the property, managed the property for a period of time that it gets no credit for that period of time?

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Evanoff

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

    Wasn't that a comment that the judge made? This was a very lengthy, protracted litigation that seemed to have gone on for a long period of time. … Because his entire future is up in the air. He doesn't know what's happening. Also, one more question that I have.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Murray v. Alaska Airlines, Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2008

    The differences are significant because in the court action, there's a much more extended period of time available. … First of all, this is the whistleblower statute, Federal Act, right? Right. This is not an invitation to a high school dance.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sihota v. IRS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2018

    That issue was not fully aired at the arbitration. … I mean, the Back Pay Act provides back pay for the period from the unlawful removal until the reinstatement. Right.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Martinez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014

    And there's really, in talking about what a typical domestic assault and battery might be, there was really no, it sort of is drawn out of the air. … First, the fact, I think, as the district court here found, the use of the word strike necessarily means a form of an intentional act.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Linde v. Arab Bank PLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

    So that's the point of my comment. … And you would say that this is sufficient to create liability generally with regard to all terrorist acts that occurred during this period in which they were providing financial services?

    87 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. George Ramirez, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

    , and that gets us to the same two acts. … Yes, but on plein air review, he would have to show. Wait, let me. Oh, I'm sorry.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mulvey v. Liquid Property Group

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2024

    It's not an act of a brokerage. I'm sorry? Not an act of a brokerage. You're not a broker? Well, you're not a broker, Your Honor. First of all, there was a licensed broker in this transaction. … It says in the middle, if he first makes objections, there's a 15-day cure period.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Electron Hydro LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

    The District Court's holding that simply impeding fish passage is take under the Endangered Species Act is wrong as a matter of law. … What we're arguing about here is a section of the dam that was installed by Electron after the artificial turf blowout – the issue that led to Clean Water Act violations.

    42 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.