Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.48s
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2017
First, the trials were aired in denying the motion to suppress statements in the first video, following Mr. Lee's request for counsel. During the first video, Mr. … Lee's previous comments that they were wasting time. He tells the officers they're wasting time. And State argues that this detracted from his very direct comment that occurred later.
39 min of audioOral argument — FORD MOTOR CO v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2011
They Resulted In The Problem In This Case Where You Have Customs Not Acting Over A Period Of Several Years. … To Act. There Was Not Communication Between The Agency. And Ford During The Relevant Period. Of Here. 2005. 2008. That'S Discussed At Pages. 10 To 12. Of The Brief. We Haven'T As Much Talked About.
36 min of audioOral argument — Morin v. Lyver
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021
The issue there are two individuals who have misdemeanor convictions that carry terms of imprisonment, but they're not offenses that involve acts of violence or acts of threatened violence. … we're going to take common sense inferences coupled with what statistical information is available, which shows that misdemeanors are more likely to break the law in the future than those who have a clean
38 min of audioOral argument — Daniel Rivera v. Allstate Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017
termination and the time period of the 10-K, but that's not enough under defamation law. … In Continental Nut, this court said, we're riding on a clean slate.
36 min of audioOral argument — HDRE Bus Partners Ltd Grp v. RARE Hospitality Intl
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2016
We're talking about the duties are pertinent to, I'm going to pay you money for this land, and you're going to let me use it for a period of time. … I'm not going to clean out the Code Seville from absurdity, sorry. Well, it's funny.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. George Ramirez, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015
, and that gets us to the same two acts. … Yes, but on plein air review, he would have to show. Wait, let me. Oh, I'm sorry.
53 min of audioOral argument — Alvin Jackson v. Wendy Kelley
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2018
Or he doesn't sound retarded, or he acted in such a way that a lay person, a retarded person wouldn't do that. … And so the court was only doing what the case law envisions, and that is making a clean, clear picture using the science, using the scores, using the evidence of adaptive deficits to conclude that Mr.
38 min of audioOral argument — Joan Friedenberg v. School Board of Palm Beach County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018
And at all times, to speak to my colleague's comment about whether this is a typical duty of a substitute teacher, at all times, substitute teachers are responsible for ensuring the safety of the students … I mean, if you tell somebody, great, we like your application, first next month we're going to give you a drug test, they can get clean for a period of time on most drugs and show up, pass the test, and
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Matthew Poulin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2015
That's not just plein air. … And even if it were plein air, in spite of the comments in Siegel about imposing a number of treatment conditions and the problems that could occur, there is yet to be any holding stating that that would
33 min of audioOral argument — Wild Fish Conservancy v. National Park Service
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2017
The Supreme Court has interpreted the notice requirements under the Clean Water Act to imply as much. So you say to the tribe and to the federal defendants, there's a problem here. … The case just argued is submitted and, speaking at least for myself, I found the arguments extremely helpful in this the comments from all of you. She's speaking for me, too.
47 min of audioOral argument — Kenneth Dickerson v. DC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2023
That discretion would be in the context of the No Child Left Behind Act. … And it's the plaintiff's view that that particular act says when you are making this structural decision, unlike a reorganization, but a structural decision in the context of that act, that act attributes
32 min of audioOral argument — Lazare Kaplan v. Photoscribe Tech
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2010
Alcock, I'd like you to get to an act of conduct which you started to get to. And obviously, you're prepared to defend the district court's ruling that there was intent. … Gresser testified, as I indicated, that his machine couldn't do the precision in a normal office environment without being floated on air.
36 min of audioOral argument — Fedorov v. Bondi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025
And then perhaps that age limitation, meaning to the certain period of time, actually was referred to the conscription prior to February 24 of 2022. … And then he cites a bunch of cases that have to do with deserting to avoid participating in acts condemned by the international community. Right.
32 min of audioOral argument — Scottsdale Insurance Company v. McGrath
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022
But we think the issue for AIR was in shifting his focus to subpart A because, in our view, the more specific provision that specifically addressed a jointly – a co-owned joint venture should have controlled … I want to just very briefly, some comments from my opposing counsel on what he calls the first refusal letter.
38 min of audioOral argument — Sheth v. Sab Tool Supply Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013
She rendered one, and then after the deposition of the plaintiff's expert, she rendered a second opinion to try to clean up what she had said the first time. … Under the law, the entire compensation in that period of breach of duty should have been forfeited.
67 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017
So it's materially different because she wasn't giving advice at all on the I-140 petition, period. Who knows how the law had changed or not. … It says, the government must show that the defendant acted with criminal intent, i.e., that's a violation of the statute. That's a mandatory requirement.
43 min of audioOral argument — Huntleigh USA v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007
So we say the fact that the contracts were for a period of time subject to termination doesn't affect them. … So the airlines couldn't use Huntley after the act. Huntley's gone.
39 min of audioOral argument — Goldring v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2021
And you kept the ball, you big IRS, kept the ball in the air for how many years while today? Your Honor, the IRS did not keep the ball in the air. … The use of money principle applies per period, and that's the holding in Avon, which is consistent with the outcome here.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. John Scantlebury
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019
So it would be a sanction in the air. … together, get a new prosecutor on the case and within the time period go after this person.
60 min of audioOral argument — Teddy Sanchez v. Ron Davis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2020
Following up on Judge Gould's comment, isn't the fact that Sanchez restrained Juanita from going into the kitchen evidence that he aided and abetted the killing of Juan? … And we thank all of you for hazarding the open air with the virus around, and for helping us out this way. Thank you. Thank you.
68 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.