Documents

Oral argument — Kristie Bell Vs. Cheswick Generating Station Genon Power Midwest, L.P

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2013

The district judge, without authority and without precedent, literally said that the Clean Air Act preempts the statute of the Clean Air Act. … What did the Clean Air Act say?

Oral argument — Boynes v. Limetree Bay Ventures

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2024

As co-permittees under that Title V of the Clean Air Act amendments, even if we were to say, wait a second, there's a corporate failure which has to be scrupulously respected, why isn't the fact that it … She went on to find under the Title V permit that terminals was a co-permittee and had a duty to ensure that refinery complied with the Clean Air Act. Right.

Oral argument — Samuel Zook v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2015

We have brought this case to the citizen suit statute of the Clean Air Act, which provides both for suits regarding non-discretionary actions where there is a time-certain deadline or a ministerial act … That unreasonable delay provision was put in there in 1990 with the amendments to the Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — Michael Determan v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2019

Oh, yeah, and make it self-cleaning. That's it. … I just wanna address some of the comments that the contractors council have made.

Oral argument — American Recycling & Manufactu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2017

Where is the requirement that OSHA cannot act until what you construe as the NFPA standard is reached? … They're simply just acting as a good coworker would.

Oral argument — The Oregon Clinic, PC v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2023

So did your clients just shut the doors, period? … I'm not sure about methamphetamine, but the smoke cases, I mean, it's a cleaning. It's a significant cleaning, but ultimately it's a cleaning.

Oral argument — KY v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

This case is about whether EPA reasonably disapproved Kentucky's submission under the Good Neighbor provision of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.

Oral argument — United States Sugar Corporation v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2024

Air Act. … The Clean Air Act expressly requires EPA to base floors on the best-performing sources, quote, for which the administrator has emissions information.

Oral argument — Chantell Sackett v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

Air Act. … So there has to be a difference in the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act to justify the difference.

Oral argument — Shari Guertin v. MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

that, if they violate their duty as a state employee, that doesn't just violate state law and maybe some federal law like the Federal Clean Water Act or something like that. … periods.

Oral argument — Latino Issues Forum v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2008

Rule 4550, however, does not do enough to fulfill the requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA should not have approved it. … The statute, the Clean Air Act, gives a petitioner 60 days from the promulgation of a final rule to raise a challenge.

Oral argument — Friends of Buckingham v. State Air Pollution Control

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019

They are insofar as under the EPA, the broader Clean Air Act scheme, a Best Available Control Technology analysis is not required for a minor source permit. … What that means is the only things that were incorporated into their decision related to site suitability had been set down by DEQ before the second comment period on environmental justice issues, before

Oral argument — State of North Carolina v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

That is not the case with the Clean Air Act. … First, the language in 7418 is not exactly the same in the Clean Air Act as the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Sandra Bahr v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2016

exceedances that occurred over 25 days in a two-year period in order to demonstrate a clean and transparent system I started off with myself, I think, as a former environmental lawyer, and I'm going … Just that comment, as one of the solutions that's out there, to make adjustments that would alleviate, and it's a city, has contingency measures in place.

Oral argument — Frazier v. Layne Christensen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2007

Now, Lane was given the opportunity to develop this particular idea, and when those of ordinary skill in the art employed at Lane considered the idea of using an air gun to clean a well screen, they simply … Chominski commented upon this other than to testify about the fact that this Colt air gun is, in fact, adjustable. And that's the point.

Oral argument — EPC of Hillsborough Cty. v. Volkswagen Grp. of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2019

Air Act. … Air Act.

Oral argument — NYSusquehanna v. Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

So does that mean the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act doesn't apply? You just said it does. I'm confused. Who would enforce it? … There are specific delegation agreements under the Clean Water Act, under the Clean Air Act, where New Jersey takes responsibility.

Oral argument — The National Association of Ho v. The San Joaquin Valley Unified

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2009

And finally, section 6.1.1 of rule 9510 can't be saved as an indirect source regulation pursuant to the Clean Air Act, because the Clean Air Act on its face says, quote, direct emission sources or facilities … So yes, you can get at, obviously an indirect source program gets at mobile source emissions, but they have to do it within the bounds of what the Clean Air Act allows, and the Clean Air Act does not allow

Oral argument — El Comite Para El v. Helliker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2008

In the preamble to the CFR, EPA approved it as complying with provisions of the Clean Air Act, as it necessarily must. … Air Act.

Oral argument — Center for Community Action v. BNSF Railway Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

already subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. … The first reason was the Clean Air Act regulates them. That's why uncontained gases were excluded, is that's now within the realm of the Clean Air Act.