Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Oral argument — Michael Abrams v. Nucor Steel Marion Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2016
Your Honors, the appellants believe that this is actually a case of first impression for the Sixth Circuit because of the fact that previously air dispersion cases from permitted users under the Clean … Air Act were preempted by the Clean Air Act.
25 min of audioOral argument — Legal Sea Foods, LLC v. Strathmore Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2021
The complaint does not say that legal seafoods closed the restaurant, cleaned and then reopened, or that it partially closed, cleaned and reopened. … And if you tried to counter it with cleaning and the only things you could do, air freshener, would also make the restaurant not very pleasant to be in.
54 min of audioOral argument — SharkRiverCleanupvs.TownshipofWallEstateofFredMcDowell Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2022
So I'm suggesting to you that it's not enough to send a notice that says, you, recipient, have violated the Clean Water Act. Please clean up your mess. That doesn't work. … If the purpose of the act is to protect the water, the Clean Water Act, and if the purpose of the plaintiff entity is, as their president acknowledged during my deposition of him, consistent with their
115 min of audioOral argument — Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2003
In addition, as we point out in our brief, every State has either a statute or a State implementation plan under the Clean Air Act that regulates agricultural burning. … But just don't forget that you have a very complicated, and as all of you know who live in California, a very strong Clean Air Act.
52 min of audioOral argument — Eco Services Operations LLC v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2015
Air Act because EPA's broad exclusion of tires and used oil unlawfully overrides text in the Clean Air Act And this matters because Congress Which provision is that? … If that's their argument, then that's something that has to be addressed under the Clean Air Act.
65 min of audioOral argument — Millennium Pipeline Company v. Basil Seggos
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2017
That is the Clean Water Act. I would argue that the Clean Water Act says a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed one year. … Not a completed application, which is a phrase that actually appears in the Clean Air Act. Receipt of an application.
28 min of audioOral argument — Stegall v. Citadell Broadcasting
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2003
But who was on the air that someone to go on the air. Her co-hosts who had been working with her. Well, that's what I mean. … He sensed the Sunday morning show was more secure because they made the great comments comment.
39 min of audioOral argument — Merrick v. Diageo Americas Supply Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015
positive requirements beyond the Clean Air Act. … Air Act claims or your air pollution claims and whether it's going to conflict with the Clean Air Act, please see Ouellette.
35 min of audioOral argument — East Coast Entertainment of Du v. Houston Casualty Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 29, 2022
All they had to do was air it out and wipe it down with water. And it was a five to seven day period of loss. And that was still considered direct physical loss. … Well, it is called period of restoration. And it is true that in the ammonia cases, for example, they had to clean, and you would have to clean here.
15 min of audioOral argument — Stegall v. Citadell Broadcasting
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2003
Kroom, were then fired on December 15th of 1999, so all of this happened with respect to Marathon Media in a very short period of time. … He sensed the Sunday morning show was more secure because they made the great comments comment.
39 min of audioOral argument — City of Oakland v. BP P.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020
The second ruling, though, the Rule 12b-6 dismissal, said there is no federal common law of greenhouse gas emissions because it's been displaced by the Clean Air Act. Hi. … Even though the Clean Air Act has a savings-to-suitors clause, even though that statutory scheme contemplates that the states will be involved.
44 min of audioOral argument — Friends of Buckingham v. State Air Pollution Control
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019
They are insofar as under the EPA, the broader Clean Air Act scheme, a Best Available Control Technology analysis is not required for a minor source permit. … What that means is the only things that were incorporated into their decision related to site suitability had been set down by DEQ before the second comment period on environmental justice issues, before
57 min of audioOral argument — Truck Trailer Manufacturers v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020
Air Act. … And at JA238, they make clear that they're only relying on the Clean Air Act.
68 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018
So as we explained in our briefs, and as Judge Ambrose was referring to, the Clean Air Act bifurcates judicial review between the circuit courts and the district courts. … So, yes, we do believe that this court vacater of the deferral decision will speed Enforcement and Clean Air Act and will speed EPA's handling of Section 126 petitions.
32 min of audioOral argument — Codoni v. Port of Seattle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2026
How does that fit in with the Clean Air Act? So that's also covered by the plain language of the Clean Air Act. Again, if we just go back to the statute. … I think we're back to the Clean Air Act. We're jumping around here, but we're back. I think we're back to the Clean Air Act.
44 min of audioOral argument — Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2026
of the Clean Water Act. … a delegated authority for the state, which means the state's actually acting under the federal Clean Water Act.
62 min of audioOral argument — Robert Anderson v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023
I had no relation to the Air Base. … So, you know, if the government's not acting, I think, I guess, if you could show that the government wasn't acting solely because of money, then it sounds like it would implicate some of these — just
47 min of audioOral argument — Connecticut Children's Medical v. Continental Casualty Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2023
My understanding is that real poverty includes spaces that may be filled with air, not the actual air. … It can be cleaned. And that would... The fact that the air can be cleaned and the fact that the surface area can be cleaned, I think, squarely puts it in within Connecticut dermatology.
32 min of audioOral argument — Energy Future Coalition v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2015
The Clean Air Act clearly anticipates that new fuels will be introduced. … Without new fuels, it would be impossible, for example, to comply with the Clean Air Act's Renewable Fuel Standard, which requires increased levels of biofuel blending into the nation's fuel pool.
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. EZ Lynk, SEZC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025
Air Act recognized that a computer shouldn't. … We would not, but the Clean Air Act has other elements to it. It says that a principal effect of what is being sold has to be to defeat the emission control.
39 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.