Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Oral argument — Michael Abrams v. Nucor Steel Marion Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2016

    Your Honors, the appellants believe that this is actually a case of first impression for the Sixth Circuit because of the fact that previously air dispersion cases from permitted users under the Clean … Air Act were preempted by the Clean Air Act.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Legal Sea Foods, LLC v. Strathmore Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2021

    The complaint does not say that legal seafoods closed the restaurant, cleaned and then reopened, or that it partially closed, cleaned and reopened. … And if you tried to counter it with cleaning and the only things you could do, air freshener, would also make the restaurant not very pleasant to be in.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — SharkRiverCleanupvs.TownshipofWallEstateofFredMcDowell Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2022

    So I'm suggesting to you that it's not enough to send a notice that says, you, recipient, have violated the Clean Water Act. Please clean up your mess. That doesn't work. … If the purpose of the act is to protect the water, the Clean Water Act, and if the purpose of the plaintiff entity is, as their president acknowledged during my deposition of him, consistent with their

    115 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2003

    In addition, as we point out in our brief, every State has either a statute or a State implementation plan under the Clean Air Act that regulates agricultural burning. … But just don't forget that you have a very complicated, and as all of you know who live in California, a very strong Clean Air Act.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eco Services Operations LLC v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2015

    Air Act because EPA's broad exclusion of tires and used oil unlawfully overrides text in the Clean Air Act And this matters because Congress Which provision is that? … If that's their argument, then that's something that has to be addressed under the Clean Air Act.

    65 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Millennium Pipeline Company v. Basil Seggos

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2017

    That is the Clean Water Act. I would argue that the Clean Water Act says a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed one year. … Not a completed application, which is a phrase that actually appears in the Clean Air Act. Receipt of an application.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stegall v. Citadell Broadcasting

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2003

    But who was on the air that someone to go on the air. Her co-hosts who had been working with her. Well, that's what I mean. … He sensed the Sunday morning show was more secure because they made the great comments comment.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Merrick v. Diageo Americas Supply Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015

    positive requirements beyond the Clean Air Act. … Air Act claims or your air pollution claims and whether it's going to conflict with the Clean Air Act, please see Ouellette.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — East Coast Entertainment of Du v. Houston Casualty Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 29, 2022

    All they had to do was air it out and wipe it down with water. And it was a five to seven day period of loss. And that was still considered direct physical loss. … Well, it is called period of restoration. And it is true that in the ammonia cases, for example, they had to clean, and you would have to clean here.

    15 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stegall v. Citadell Broadcasting

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2003

    Kroom, were then fired on December 15th of 1999, so all of this happened with respect to Marathon Media in a very short period of time. … He sensed the Sunday morning show was more secure because they made the great comments comment.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — City of Oakland v. BP P.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

    The second ruling, though, the Rule 12b-6 dismissal, said there is no federal common law of greenhouse gas emissions because it's been displaced by the Clean Air Act. Hi. … Even though the Clean Air Act has a savings-to-suitors clause, even though that statutory scheme contemplates that the states will be involved.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Friends of Buckingham v. State Air Pollution Control

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019

    They are insofar as under the EPA, the broader Clean Air Act scheme, a Best Available Control Technology analysis is not required for a minor source permit. … What that means is the only things that were incorporated into their decision related to site suitability had been set down by DEQ before the second comment period on environmental justice issues, before

    57 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Truck Trailer Manufacturers v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

    Air Act. … And at JA238, they make clear that they're only relying on the Clean Air Act.

    68 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of Delaware Department of Natural Resourcesand Environmental Control v. US Environmental Protection Agency

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

    So as we explained in our briefs, and as Judge Ambrose was referring to, the Clean Air Act bifurcates judicial review between the circuit courts and the district courts. … So, yes, we do believe that this court vacater of the deferral decision will speed Enforcement and Clean Air Act and will speed EPA's handling of Section 126 petitions.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Codoni v. Port of Seattle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2026

    How does that fit in with the Clean Air Act? So that's also covered by the plain language of the Clean Air Act. Again, if we just go back to the statute. … I think we're back to the Clean Air Act. We're jumping around here, but we're back. I think we're back to the Clean Air Act.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2026

    of the Clean Water Act. … a delegated authority for the state, which means the state's actually acting under the federal Clean Water Act.

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Robert Anderson v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

    I had no relation to the Air Base. … So, you know, if the government's not acting, I think, I guess, if you could show that the government wasn't acting solely because of money, then it sounds like it would implicate some of these — just

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Connecticut Children's Medical v. Continental Casualty Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2023

    My understanding is that real poverty includes spaces that may be filled with air, not the actual air. … It can be cleaned. And that would... The fact that the air can be cleaned and the fact that the surface area can be cleaned, I think, squarely puts it in within Connecticut dermatology.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Energy Future Coalition v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2015

    The Clean Air Act clearly anticipates that new fuels will be introduced. … Without new fuels, it would be impossible, for example, to comply with the Clean Air Act's Renewable Fuel Standard, which requires increased levels of biofuel blending into the nation's fuel pool.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. EZ Lynk, SEZC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025

    Air Act recognized that a computer shouldn't. … We would not, but the Clean Air Act has other elements to it. It says that a principal effect of what is being sold has to be to defeat the emission control.

    39 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.