Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Kiraz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017

Those are the overt acts alleged as overt act number four in Count 1. Mr. … That means that Daniel had to take the extra step of removing the six months of house and door that was recorded on the spreadsheet in order to give what I'll call a clean spreadsheet, a clean false spreadsheet

Oral argument — In re: Sanders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2023

Sanders to make some introductory comments. Thank you. Go ahead, please. Good morning, Your Honors. I thank the Court. … The way that it's portrayed in the debtor's papers is that this is a complete fiction pulled out of thin air. They just wrote checks. They have no idea where they went.

Oral argument — Vine Street LLC v. Keeling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

Because, Your Honor, they engaged in intentional acts that were designed to dispose of perk. Okay, so so you're accepting the fact that that the act of Norwich had to be an intentional act. … They had that knowledge, and they intended the consequences of that act, of their acts. And when it seeped out, they intended that act. So that leaves me kind of hanging. I don't think so.

Oral argument — Entergy Texas, Incorporated v. Donna Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

And they didn't say subject to this is all going to be up in the air again when we get the final true-up. … For the entire period. For the entire period. And it made its order effective from the beginning of the compliance period, starting June 2007, even though the decision was made in 2015.

Oral argument — Steven Melton v. City of Forrest City, Arkansas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

Again, the timing is vague, but we do know that the timing was a two week period following the suspension meeting. … The mayor acted as a final decision maker. So even if you disagree with me on qualified immunity, the mayor is still liable in his official capacity and so is the city.

Oral argument — Whirlpool v. LG Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2008

Yes, he purchased it in 94 for the purpose of performing wet cleaning and he says that in 97 he was fully doing wet cleaning and there's no dispute that wet cleaning is an entirely different, very high … Dry cleaning, wet cleaning, that's the context in which he testified about wet cleaning, and normal washing.

Oral argument — Susan Dyer Reynolds v. Dean E. Preston

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024

But nonetheless Reynolds is entitled to qualified immunity because the Linkey test was necessarily not known to him at the time he acted during the relevant time period of this case which is 2020. … I mean it's what it's wiped clean as if that decision never existed for our purposes. Am I reading Camreta wrong?

Oral argument — Government of Greece Hellenic Air Force v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2025

The Hellenic Air Force, your honor. We'll call it HAAF. … And you knew before the six-year period that you weren't going to get the goods. Well, we knew we weren't going to get functionally working cameras if that's what the court is talking about.

Oral argument — Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2023

You said he's acting to avoid a greater hazard. … The other comment I had is there are six factors that the commission looks at for unwarrantable.

Oral argument — Reed v. Country Place-Apartments

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016

The act doesn't apply, period. It's a straight negligence, you know, defective condition case. And that's a Green thing. … He was hired to clean them, and he did that on November 30, 2010. He testified that at that time he cleaned everything out of them. I cleaned it all, is what he said.

Oral argument — Atchafalaya Basinkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

To the contrary, the 408 EA expressly said that they would be insignificant and that mitigation would be discussed in the 404 EA, the Clean Water Act EA, solely because the Clean Water Act regs do require … So very much the Clean Water Act is designed to protect specific uses.

Oral argument — City & County of San Francisco v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2022

And as a result of the vacater of one of those necessary authorizations, the permit would not be effective just for the purposes of the Clean Water Act. … And you're creating exactly the situation that Arkansas versus Oklahoma said the Clean Water Act did not do.

Oral argument — United States v. Stephen Regis, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024

We're talking about an actual depiction of a sex act. It has to be blatant. And so, well, this doesn't have to show a sex act. I mean, so this is not right. … You're trying to clean up his mistakes. It's a big mistake. I'm doing my job as an appellate attorney. You know, no comment on that. You don't need a comment on that.

Oral argument — Peoples National Bank, N.A. v. Darnell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019

I'm just out of thin air. And really, the guarantee is no different. This record is silent that on May 18th, when this loan was made, that Mr. … It had been going on a period of time. Of five years, Your Honor, yes. And what interested me is the fact that Mr. Garnell testified that after three years he was supposed to be released.

Oral argument — Knox Creek Coal Corporation v. Secretary of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

Congress, when it enacted the act, could have determined that all violations were SNS. … This case, yes, there is in the Mine Act about methane and other things going back to the 1977 or the 69 Act.

Oral argument — Peabody Twentymile Mining v. Secretary of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

These stoppings are constructed to separate airways, to separate intake air from return air and intake air from belt air and the like. Peabody builds these stoppings. … One of the things, there's a comment. What's the standard purpose? It's to separate airways.

Oral argument — United States v. George Curtis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

This court and other courts have said other acts, evidence such as other tax violations, is admissible. … He claims it was for intent, but all it was to do was to say, this guy isn't so clean. I can tell you he's not so clean because just a couple of months ago he didn't pay his payroll taxes.

Oral argument — Office of the State Fire Marshal v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2022

And also they would continue to be regulated under the Environmental Protection Act, generally, for any water pollution, air pollution, or ground pollution they caused. … It does provide a way to ensure that there is money to provide to clean up messes.

Oral argument — Housey v. Procter & Gamble Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2022

And if it's working to clean the teeth, it's also working to abrade the enamel. … If you look at the products that the judge looked at, charcoal has water, sorbital, disodium, pyphosphorate, carbon air, charcoal powder.

Oral argument — St. Alexius Medical Center v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2015

Bierschke saw her family doctor on several occasions during that time period, and she was in the emergency room on two different occasions during that time period, and there was no mention made at all … He doesn't comment on it at all. And as is pointed out, even Dr. Romeo is wishy-washy on his causal connection opinion.