Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.20s
Oral argument — De Anda Bramasco v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2009
period. … You mentioned at the outset of your comments that mediation would have been the most appropriate route. What's wrong with trying it now?
21 min of audioOral argument — City of Chicago v. Alexander
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2014
And we know in this case that the interest absolutely in crime overnight would not be served at all by moving the time period to a different, the time period would not be served. … In fact, there was comment that the protesters on homelessness could continue their expression all day, all night.
67 min of audioOral argument — Ryan DeKeyser v. Thyssenkrupp Waupaca, Incorpor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2017
Some departments have gigantic air hoods that suck up most of the particulate matter to get it out. … Well, I think that you follow the clean products decision. In the absence of a Daubert challenge, a district court may rely on expert evidence for class certification.
39 min of audioOral argument — Clark Co. Nat'l Res. v. Clark County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003
The letter regulation wasn't subject to notice and comment rulemaking. Another issue is that this same agency has already been found in violation of the Clean Water Act for this same issue. … The Clean Water Act does not provide any definition of what is meant by reducing to the maximum extent practicable.
39 min of audioOral argument — Lewis v. Board of Supervisors of LSU
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2025
It was truly clean-sleuthing. … He came during the Hush Blackwell time period, but he was not there at all during the Les Miles period that was the main subject of . . .
41 min of audioOral argument — KINITI-WAIRIMU, etc v. MUKASEY
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009
Kiniti started on a clean slate with the IJA in the absence of improperly admitted research. … His father had been detained briefly for a period of 10 days, and he did not know the current whereabouts of his father at that time.
31 min of audioOral argument — Vine Street LLC v. Keeling
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014
Because, Your Honor, they engaged in intentional acts that were designed to dispose of perk. Okay, so so you're accepting the fact that that the act of Norwich had to be an intentional act. … They had that knowledge, and they intended the consequences of that act, of their acts. And when it seeped out, they intended that act. So that leaves me kind of hanging. I don't think so.
37 min of audioOral argument — Whirlpool v. LG Electronics
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2008
Yes, he purchased it in 94 for the purpose of performing wet cleaning and he says that in 97 he was fully doing wet cleaning and there's no dispute that wet cleaning is an entirely different, very high … Dry cleaning, wet cleaning, that's the context in which he testified about wet cleaning, and normal washing.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Montemayor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2022
So we are on plain air. … In count two of the firearm conspiracy, there is no doubt that this was not a clean charge, not a clean instruction. I assume the pattern jury instructions discriminate between those two, right?
46 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Club v. US Dept of the Army Corps of Engineers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2021
You then listed separately the Clean Water Act. So am I hearing you now say that this argument you're making is not under Appendix B but is under the Clean Water Act? No, Your Honor. … So there will be a situation where you have a Clean Water Act permit that triggers NEPA, and you have to look beyond just the Clean Water Act jurisdictional piece into other impacts.
79 min of audioOral argument — Continental Tire North America v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2011
So it's a short period of time from the date of his injury until he's at his family physician, Dr. Thompson, who's seen him for 20 years. And Dr. … And he brings up the absolute cleaning case. The absolute cleaning case recited the case which in our original brief we said had never been recited.
33 min of audioOral argument — Housey v. Procter & Gamble Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2022
And if it's working to clean the teeth, it's also working to abrade the enamel. … If you look at the products that the judge looked at, charcoal has water, sorbital, disodium, pyphosphorate, carbon air, charcoal powder.
29 min of audioOral argument — Janice LaRiviere v. Board Trustees of Southern Ill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019
So what do we make of the email comment about it being lonely? Sure. … So it's a newer building that was cleaned up before she went there.
18 min of audioOral argument — City & County of San Francisco v. USEPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2022
And as a result of the vacater of one of those necessary authorizations, the permit would not be effective just for the purposes of the Clean Water Act. … And you're creating exactly the situation that Arkansas versus Oklahoma said the Clean Water Act did not do.
48 min of audioOral argument — Soria Gonzalez v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2012
I respect the comment, but I am not in agreement with that assertion. What I would say, Your Honor, is the term, the proper term is the statutory bar expired. … The board acted well within its broad discretion to deny that motion to reopen. Does it make any difference if we remand?
37 min of audioOral argument — Gay v. McDonough
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2021
Chief Justice Roberts specifically addressed the issue of a clean slate or a dirty slate. … If they're not writing on a clean slate, they need to look at what's in the record. I think it gives us one more bite at the apple. What do you think the clean slate or blank slate language means?
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Stephen Regis, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024
We're talking about an actual depiction of a sex act. It has to be blatant. And so, well, this doesn't have to show a sex act. I mean, so this is not right. … You're trying to clean up his mistakes. It's a big mistake. I'm doing my job as an appellate attorney. You know, no comment on that. You don't need a comment on that.
35 min of audioOral argument — In re: Marriage of Dunahee
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2014
I mean, I think she would only qualify for working in a store at a minimum wage job or maybe cleaning other people's houses. Basically, that's all she has. … Dunhee is going to have to be working for a long period of time to come.
43 min of audioOral argument — Susan Dyer Reynolds v. Dean E. Preston
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024
But nonetheless Reynolds is entitled to qualified immunity because the Linkey test was necessarily not known to him at the time he acted during the relevant time period of this case which is 2020. … I mean it's what it's wiped clean as if that decision never existed for our purposes. Am I reading Camreta wrong?
27 min of audioOral argument — Atchafalaya Basinkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018
To the contrary, the 408 EA expressly said that they would be insignificant and that mitigation would be discussed in the 404 EA, the Clean Water Act EA, solely because the Clean Water Act regs do require … So very much the Clean Water Act is designed to protect specific uses.
48 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.