Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.37s
Oral argument — George Cooper, Sr. v. James Sheehan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2013
The clean question of law is taking the facts in the most favorable light to the plaintiff. … Well, I'm just following up on Judge Wynn's comments unless you disagree with him.
37 min of audioOral argument — Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Thomas Vilsack
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017
A certification that was still clean. Not only that, but also the initial license application, the history of past inspections. … At the end of the period of my license, it ends unless I renew it, right? It's gone. It ends. I don't have a license. My license says it goes until X period, and then it's over.
43 min of audioOral argument — ABT Systems, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2015
Rudd, the inventor, testified that it was well-known before his invention that the fan of a forced air HVAC system moved and circulated the air. That's what a fan does. … What about your friend's comment about your own expert's testimony? Yes, absolutely, because that question at that time was very specific as to what's the best time to run the fan.
31 min of audioOral argument — Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo, Sec. of Comm.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2024
We have no beef with Chevron's Clean Air Act holding, and we could not take issue with its APA holding because it failed to mention that statute. … It was a Clean Air Act case. The court sort of stumbled into these pronouncements about how, as a meta matter, you should go about statutory consideration. It was a mistake.
76 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Christian Lovies
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2021
Now, I'll begin by saying the government says harmless air and appoints to the judges single sentence. I'd impose the same sentence. … Take care and make a clean record on each of the three steps of Batson. They're not there by happenstance. They're not there for some reason that doesn't make any sense.
30 min of audioOral argument — Mohammed Jibril v. Alejandro Mayorkas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2021
And we believe that they were put on the watch list after those prior clean travel experiences. They had not had a clean travel experience since the ones articulated in the complaint. … For the other five murder scenes, I say, no comment. Wouldn't you draw an inference from that?
45 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019
ignore the specific Terms of what a shared component Is But to answer the court's questions With regard to how this occurred Keep in mind There's 11 million dollars in alleged Back charges For a six year period … of your time giving me Quotations just what I'll do is I'll have To the record and then I Can tell the court That I said to the judge I made the Area we win because I said They're charging for In room Cleaning
35 min of audioOral argument — Remington Lodging v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016
Animus in the air is not enough to overcome the Supreme Court's clear statement that the statute is clear. There must be proof of discrimination, and you must prove actual discouragement. … A hotel is a 24-7 operation, and they had rooms to clean.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hector Castaneda
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 29, 2022
And in fact then the defense filed a sentencing commentary which focused entirely on the period of imprisonment and did not discuss the period of supervised release. … But if, I understand Judge Stroganoff's comment, this moves on to plain air review, then we get to, we agree the first three prongs are met under the law, and we get to the fourth context of this case.
21 min of audioOral argument — Earl v. Boeing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 5, 2022
You got clean shirts. You consumed the free shirts. What's the problem? … This is a period, class period, and did he find any variance across dates, and is that a problem?
59 min of audioOral argument — American Civil Rights Union v. Brenda Snipes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2019
It reads subsection A4 of the National Voter Registration Act, section 8, as the only mandate for list maintenance or for cleaning the voter rolls, only with respect to death and changes of addresses. … Vote Act, section 21083A4.
70 min of audioOral argument — Sirridge v. Bar-S Food Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2005
Seerage and this kind of air of comments that were being made may have been, was not a positive, I think was to use his words. … So, I mean, this is over a long period of time. My argument, sir, is this is a post hoc rationalization for an otherwise discriminatory act. In other words, this is something that Mr.
22 min of audioOral argument — CSX Corp v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2007
Now, in the decoupling act, what the Congress said was that the language of the act itself is all regulations. … I can't believe they pulled it out of thin air.
66 min of audioOral argument — Jason Hacker v. N. Cain
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018
Hacker clearly exhausted his claim as a matter of law under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Unless there are initial questions, I'll begin with the evidence of Mr. Hacker's actual disability. … So when he's out in the field during this three-month period... Well, he did have a record of disability.
39 min of audioOral argument — K. S. v. NW Independent School District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016
Do you have a comment on that? … In fact, the allegation is that it was a response of a comment, an offhand comment, about don't go crying to your mama from a coach. It's the whole thing.
39 min of audioOral argument — Warren Johnson v. Advocate Health and Hospitals
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017
For example, that statement that Polish people, uh, clean better than black people or whatever the statement was. … Those are exactly the kinds of comments we have here. We have Susan Castillo saying that she doesn't want to hire blacks because they're lazy and because Polish people clean better.
45 min of audioOral argument — People v. Heibenthal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024
And it bears repeating that Officer Wilkie said she was in violation of the Cannabis Control Act. … They can be tended by registered patients or their authorized agent for brief periods. So there's some ambiguity here.
46 min of audioOral argument — Monroe v. Houston Indep Sch Dist
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022
Monroe, from coming on to any HISD facilities for a prescribed period of time. … Do you have any comment on his 28J case? Your Honor, I don't know how the Court feels about 28J practice.
36 min of audioOral argument — Teresa Perkins v. Kenneth Edgar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2022
He was pleading for air. He was making it abundantly clear that he could not breathe. … Perkins, and another officer had his knee periodically, not constantly, but periodically, just above the hip area of Mr. Perkins.
28 min of audioOral argument — Marc Veasey v. Greg Abbott
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015
procedures so there are a host of ameliorative options that the state had available to itself and that was the same let me shift you I hate to cut you off but that sentence look like it didn't have a period … reason your honor may be uncomfortable at this point is that the discriminatory finding has told the legislature that their law is entitled to no difference and now what the legislature needs to do is go clean
56 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.