Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Oral argument — Waddoups v. Air Force

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

    does have delegated authority, and then you'd have to figure out the scope of his delegated authority, the nature of his discretion, whether his discretion is broad, whether there's any remedy if he acts … He hadn't said that before to a supervisor, to a supervisor who had, in fact, been responsive about finding a treatment facility within the period permitted.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Darek Kitlinski v. DOJ

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

    Let's say that Derek was not – it's just a matter of geography and convenience that Derek was located in Washington, D.C. during this time period. … Air Force. This is a case where Mr.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ixcoy Herrera v. Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

    These are on pages 135 and 136 of the record, and I'm not just picking these out of the air. … They say periods of a few months, I think it was eight months there, isn't enough. Our briefing has cases that also have much longer periods that aren't enough.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Invenergy Thermal LLC v. Watson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2024

    And one of the things that's very important to Invenergy is operating an efficient and clean plant in this bridge period where we move to more renewable sources. So there is a need there. … The Clean Energy Transformation Act, or CETA, requires Washington utilities to decarbonize their portfolios.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — QATAR INTL TRADING v. AIR FORCE

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

    of that eight-month period. … Just very brief comments. On the last point, we agree that U.S. law applies. I'm not aware of any statute that a service provider cannot charge the user of a telephone for cloned services.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Atrium Medical Center v. HHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013

    You need to go and challenge that through the notice of rulemaking and commenting period. You need to submit comments during the rulemaking period. … The same way with this irregular short-term disability act. Nothing that specific was promulgated.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Alisqa Water

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2005

    And why isn't this situation more like that, that there is concurrent jurisdiction in both EPA and whatever the state has to do to enforce the provisions of the Clean Water Act, but that the enforcement … And regardless of how this issue resolves itself, there's independent bases for the court to have taken that, and there's cases in the Ninth Circuit, Clean Air Act cases, that deal with that 1345 independent

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Demetris Hill

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 29, 2024

    Hill's company that he came out and actually performed the cleaning services. … Hill purporting to be a lead cleaner and allegedly doing at least some cleaning.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bartlett v. Honeywell Internat

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2018

    Right, I'm just going to say that there can be some confusion based on the fact that there were plaintiffs during the notice and comment period who were challenging various aspects of the consent decree … During the period of dredging operations, there has been no evidence of adverse impacts to human health.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Avaya Inc v. Telecom Labs

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2016

    are entitled to a new trial even as to the prior period. … First of all, it's not the holding of either Queen City or Harrison Air, and it's not the implication of either Queen City or Harrison Air. Starting with Harrison Air, hold just a moment.

    71 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 1010 Lake Shore Association v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2015

    And again, there are three comments, and all three are cited in the 1010 case. And again, although the comments vary a little bit, all three have the same underlying intention. … So to add this language didn't clean up or confirm, excuse me, something that already happened. It was added, I think, for a purpose.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Morgan v. USDC for AZ

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2007

    And I also think that if Your Honor's rule, as we ask you to, that Judge Martone should be given the opportunity to start from a clean slate on future cases. … You know, the odd thing, too, is that we're, of course, you're here on mandamus, and the burden is so high on mandamus and clear air of the law and so forth.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2015

    Well, it's during the period of the violation, yes, sir. The period of the violation is alleged to be 94 to May of 2000. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I thought they said something about 50% at some time. … What they explained in their final version was that they weren't going to narrow it in response to comments. But then they created a separate deal for equalization tanks.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — MONTALVO v. SPIRIT AIRLINES

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2007

    There's no comment by Congress. … The field that Judge Garth had participated on, that is addressing framed in terms of the field of air safety.

    64 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bible Pork, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

    T that already occurred for brought into the land act Here we have a clerical ju the clerical connection i procedure, not of substan act is a statute of subst harm and remedies allow u act depending on … Was be were by injunction saying money to clean up what's or you got to reimburse u done to clean up of what that occurred, damaging t our situation at all.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rishi Shah

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2026

    And Gligoyevich, actually, the same comment that the court said, the instructions were otherwise unexceptionable. … And that would be completely contrary to principles of plain air and rule 12. So that's the preservation side.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

    So it has trucks traveling across the highway, it has planes in the air. … Act.

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Novel Laboratories, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2014

    Our argument is driven by patent law, which says that when a patentee acts as its own lexicographer— And you're saying that Collins, too, he said they define clinically significant, right? … Okay, but so it says may be divided and administered to the patient in two or more administrations over an appropriate period of time.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro Boat Works

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2009

    So there was a period from 69 to 74 when PAI owned San Pedro Boatworks as a wholly owned subsidiary. … And when you read the comments about that, it tells us to go to section 328 to find out what a possessor means.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Sanft

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2024

    So first they said that the argument in Iverson is a responsible corporate officer applies only if you're actually acting on your authority over the persons who violate the Clean Water Act. … And if the jury thought that the jury convicted him of only negligent violation of the Clean Water Act in 2 through 30, then, of course, it wouldn't have convicted him of knowledge on the others.

    44 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.