Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Oral argument — Intertape Polymer Corp. v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015
Because it's out of the ordinary, they just can't do it, period. I think hopefully I'm understanding your question correctly. … There had been no activity between the March date and the April date for a considerable period of time.
39 min of audioOral argument — New Jersey Conservation Foundation v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2024
Why isn't there a Clean Air Act argument raised with respect to the air quality standards? I do not know. I mean, that is, you know, the EPA is the one that's going to enforce that. … They have another obligation under New Jersey law, which relates to the clean energy law.
124 min of audioOral argument — USAv.Amirnazmi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011
The Clean Air Act, for instance, does indeed delegate to the president and the EPA administrator the ability to criminalize certain conduct. … , and to report to Congress periodically.
39 min of audioOral argument — American Airlines, Inc. v. Robert Mawhinney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2018
We're saying, or the FAA, we're saying you have a contract to arbitrate this, period. No. Has nothing to do with the FAA, has nothing to do with the Arbitration Act, your contract. Yes. … Well, based on your comments during Mr. Mawinney's comments, I thought I... I didn't understand your argument at all.
43 min of audioOral argument — Energy Michigan Inc v. MI Public Service Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023
So the state has typically historically done that on one-year periods. Now it's doing that on a four-year period. That's fine. That increases reliability without discrimination. … The real local clean requirement that MISO establishes is in the 90% range.
49 min of audioOral argument — Invenergy Thermal LLC v. Watson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2024
And one of the things that's very important to Invenergy is operating an efficient and clean plant in this bridge period where we move to more renewable sources. So there is a need there. … The Clean Energy Transformation Act, or CETA, requires Washington utilities to decarbonize their portfolios.
41 min of audioOral argument — Chapman Law Firm Co v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2006
Well, but if you say you're going to clean up the room, you have to clean up your room sometime this week, then if he goes out and plays today, he's not out of compliance. … And HMBI could have acted accordingly by rearranging what it needed to do.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lisa Lewis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2016
But even if we thought that this slate was completely clean, she could raise this again, what good does that do you? The government continues to recommend 10 years. … After all was said and done, wasn't the 10-year period, there's a guideline range that gets calculated where the 10-year period is actually at the bottom of the guideline range, and then there was another
16 min of audioOral argument — Bracamonte-Palma v. Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2024
And now that the whole regime is up in the air, why shouldn't we be required to go back to our prior law? … Walk me through, just say we were, hypothetically, we had a clean slate and we're just trying to put the pieces together.
25 min of audioOral argument — Ixcoy Herrera v. Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022
These are on pages 135 and 136 of the record, and I'm not just picking these out of the air. … They say periods of a few months, I think it was eight months there, isn't enough. Our briefing has cases that also have much longer periods that aren't enough.
34 min of audioOral argument — Ohio Valley Environmental v. Scott Pruitt
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018
It's defined in the Clean Water Act, so it's under federal law. Okay. So as defined in the Clean Water Act, West Virginia has been submitting TMDLs. Yes, that's exactly right. … Well, and the Clean Water Act lets them do that, right?
47 min of audioOral argument — Northern California River Watc v. Carl Wilcox
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2009
So it means those kinds of areas that are subject to the Clean Water Act? … In the Habitat Conservation Why hasn't Congress done so under the Clean Water Act by declaring, okay, this is what happens under the Clean Water Act.
38 min of audioOral argument — Flores v. Shephard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2007
In particular, that Officer Shepard ran a license check on Antonio Flores, and it came back clean. There is no evidence in the record of that fact. … Penney's, when all this was going on, involved grab-and-run thefts that had existed for a period of time, a period of weeks, before this date, where the evidence in the case showed that people, groups,
15 min of audioOral argument — North Idaho Community Action N v. United States Department o
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 25, 2008
But this process, as the Court's indicated, requires the Section 4 Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act permit. … As this Court has acknowledged in the Carmel-by-the-Sea case, when we have a NEPA project that will affect wetlands, the 404 permit is required, and it's a substantive statute, the Clean Water Act.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brittany Jones
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025
Her involvement took place in a shorter period of time. Her involvement only included April the 26th and April the 27th. … the instruction in sand at the end of it references that's the coercion of her minor that the minor was coerced and this just repeats the phrase tough act tough act tough act and if you read it it's I
99 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Johnson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2022
in the very same piece of legislation, the anti-drug abuse act of 1986. … And as the Supreme court instructed in Rosello where Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute, but omits it in another section of the same act, it's presumed Congress acted intentionally
23 min of audioOral argument — McElroy v. Astrue
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2007
It would be making meals, cleaning the house, doing dishes and vacuuming. … He's not acting as a disability assessor. He's acting as a doctor. Right. And he notes the fibromyalgia. And ALJ did find this to be a severe impairment. And he's — it is a severe impairments case.
23 min of audioOral argument — Coos County Board v. Norton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2008
The Clean Water Act has one. The Clean Air Act has one. … I guess I have a couple comments on that.
41 min of audioOral argument — Video Gaming Technologies, Inc v. Bureau of Gambling Control
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2009
This is a – this enforcement had to do with a third party in this case, and we believe it is much more like the safe air for everyone case. … They made no effort at a reasonable accommodation in terms of time for the individual to clean up the nuisance.
28 min of audioOral argument — Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation v. NC Dept of Transportation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016
Hunter representing Clean Air Carolina and the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation. There are an inordinate number of acronyms in this case. Yes, there are, Your Honor. … The numbers could be contained within the region, they could disappear in the thin air. They're not studied, they're not considered.
41 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.