Documents

Oral argument — United States v. APPEL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2004

Cetron, was that the chemical and ecological functions of the areas surrounding a river are important and that the Clean Water Act should require protecting areas that funnel water into a river. … This is not a straightforward case that you normally would see in a Clean Water Act situation. So with that, I know I've run out of time, and I will not keep you any further. Thank you, counsel.

Oral argument — Eastern Hydroelectric Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2018

Yet other Federal and State resource agencies have a role as well under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources has to issue a Clean Water Act certificate. … The State of Georgia has Clean Water Act authority, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Marine Fishery Service. They have authority under Section 18 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Porter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2019

At some period in there, she was working and at others she was not. She injured her shoulder. … You just can't pull things out of thin air. Now, I think that's kind of what the argument Wakeman is now making, is that the judge is kind of pulling this out of thin air.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

And in fact, the proof at trial was that some of the acts in this case relating to the criminal offense occurred in Virginia and elsewhere. … I think that is a very clean way to resolve the case. Can I? I'm sorry.

Oral argument — Resurrection Bay Conservation v. City of Seward, Alaska

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2011

We gave the City more than 60 days notice that it was violating the Clean Water Act. The City failed to obtain a permit, forcing RBCA to sue and enforce the Clean Water Act. RBCA asked for 1. … And the attorney's fees under the Clean Water Act is a private attorney general statute. It's to encourage enforcement of the Clean Water Act by citizens.

Oral argument — Thomas Coleman v. Frank Kendall, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2025

Air Force, Retired, Appellant, v. Gary A. Ashworth, Acting Secretary of the Air Force Mr. Thayer for the Appellant, Ms. Otusa for the FLE Mr. Thayer, good morning. Good morning. … There's no rule that necessarily requires the waiver to be processed within a certain period of time.

Oral argument — Dasbach v. American Commercial Lines, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2011

And it did say in the comments the liability of the shipowner will be guided by land-based principles of negligence. … When the barges are then cleaned in between cargoes, obviously you don't want to mix grain with cement, so they're cleaned.

Oral argument — Shannon J.Mandelv.M&QPackaging Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2012

Air. It's not considered consent. And the subjective offensiveness issue is uniquely to be decided by the jury. In the Burlington Northern v. … However, here where you're looking at over a 10-year period of time, there needs to be some relation between these acts.

Oral argument — Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Novel Laboratories, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2014

Our argument is driven by patent law, which says that when a patentee acts as its own lexicographer— And you're saying that Collins, too, he said they define clinically significant, right? … Okay, but so it says may be divided and administered to the patient in two or more administrations over an appropriate period of time.

Oral argument — Boutique Air Inc. v. DOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2025

And the department made this decision despite the undisputed fact that Denver Air plans to charge the federal government taxpayers millions of dollars more for the four-year period that is covered by the … Moreover, the community comments mentioned that Denver Air Connection has a strong record of reliability at other EAS communities, which the department also took into consideration.

Oral argument — Southern Appalachian Mountain v. A & G Coal Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

There is no indication that that pollutant, heat, was in the written application associated with Piney Run's Clean Water Act permit. It wasn't in the permit itself. … Wouldn't you be required, though, or would the district court be required under the Clean Water Act to have proof that the agency did know?

Oral argument — IN RE: VALLEY PARK

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2004

the adjacent runway and old air base facilities like that. … Mackey that precludes a bank from holding stock for certain period of time.

Oral argument — Pyramid Technologies, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2013

And we're talking about basically humidity conditions in air. What was the district judge thinking? I don't know. … I've seen a lot of cases where insurance companies act in bad faith. I just don't think this is one of them.

Oral argument — Informing Citizens Against Run v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2018

And so my clients provided seven, six or seven studies in the comment period. They actively participated and said, would you please look at these? … Well, but they did in their comments. They talked about noise pollution and air pollution and other environmental issues. So just go directly to the question, if you don't mind. Sure.

Oral argument — People v. Olla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2018

Is that a comment on the defendant's attack on the victim's credibility? I'm sorry, I didn't hear you, Judge. Is that a comment on the defendant's attack on the victim's credibility? … Yes, and that's when we get to the plein air. Let's talk about plein air. Why is it that it's supposed to be balanced in this case? Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Gorski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Then in the- No, but what I'm saying is you could issue a period of instruction in either of two circumstances, I would think. … What we seem to have here is that he went, instead of going out and getting someone else to clean the windows, he went and cleaned them himself, charged $120, and is now subject to a forfeiture of $120

Oral argument — Susan Allan v. PA Higher Ed Assistance Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2020

And in those public comments, as Judge Sutton noted, there were comments that were submitted by a company called Noble Communications, Noble Concepts. … One of the things to point out is what the purpose of this particular act was and it was indiscriminate filing and as opposing counsel noted yes there were there were comments about how 9-1-1 operators

Oral argument — People v. Rubio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023

And there was some lesser included analysis provided regarding an instructional air clean. There, the court found that there was not a lesser included of possessing child pornography. … Okay, under either Donovan or Reyes or any other case law, is there a time, like, is there anybody who says that's too short of a period of time for it to not be considered together? No, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Harvest Food Group v. 4220 Kildare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2025

I withdraw the comment. … And then all of a sudden the escrow ran out and killed air said, not going to pay anymore.

Oral argument — and 03-16887 Defenders of Wildlife v. Flowers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2005

But really, this is an Endangered Species Act case involving a Clean Water Act permit. … EPA was sued, much like the Corps was sued here, for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act.