Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.47s
Oral argument — United States v. Hunt and Callahan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015
The first video was made on October 16, 2011, a year and a half into this period of time, including after the period of time that Ms. Eckley was supposedly held captive in a basement. … But again, all they needed is that one overt act, that one overt act to convict.
39 min of audioOral argument — State of California v. Neville Chemical Co
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003
But you don't have a draft remedial action plan within the statutory period. I mean, that would be a clean-cut matter, which is not completely under control of the State, but it doesn't work here. … And that comment period happens after the draft remedial action plan is put out for public review, in this case in March of 95, and before the Department makes its final decision.
41 min of audioOral argument — Houston v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011
In that job, he was in charge of cleaning at night, a job that he performed on his own, cleaning the cafeteria, moving tables, cleaning and wiping down tables. … He sees him for a very brief period of time. And then he bases his opinions on incomplete medical records.
28 min of audioOral argument — Ecology Center, Inc. v. Kimbell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008
The Solicitor General's brief noted that there is an exception to that when the statute implementing a regulation specifically provides for pre-enforcement review, such as the Clean Air Act, and that was … Now, it's true that in many contexts an agency doesn't need to accede to the comments, the public comments. It doesn't have to choose a specific commenter's path.
35 min of audioOral argument — Vanessa Sutton v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2023
And the pictures definitely show a messy area there and they're taken after it's cleaned up. … Roberts' testimony that when she cleaned up, she was right there. She came over, she cleaned up immediately. It was one grape and a little bit of grape juice she cleaned up.
28 min of audioOral argument — RHOADES v. AVON PRODUCTS
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2007
It can't just come out of thin air. … Under the Lanham Act, a trademark holder has two methods of enforcing their rights.
21 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Michael Jenkins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011
During that period of time that he was in the hospital. He walked out of the hospital that same day. That is correct. With a clean bill of health. I'm not sure I'd go that far, Your Honor. … It means it was different than he normally acts. He wasn't his normal self. He had maintained that he didn't do this this entire period of time, and now he maintains it again. I didn't do this.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rahimi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022
Well, your brief didn't address their comment about surety laws, right? I think we did address that, Your Honor, but I'm happy to clear that up right now. … He shot it into the air. Your Honor, at that time, he did discharge a gun.
41 min of audioOral argument — Sino Clean Energy, Inc. v. Robert Seiden
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2018
It matters, Your Honor, because of what happened in the interim time period. … Ren and Sino Clean Energy are attempting to do.
32 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2022
Once you got it during the comment period, once you had it was it not part of the record? Was it not available to the public to comment? It was not. It was published on DOJ's website. … But the folks who had already begun using the comment period to develop their comments… I guess I'm just… Was it part of the rulemaking record or not? No, Your Honor. It was not.
29 min of audioOral argument — Atlas Air, Inc. v. Internation
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2019
Robert Siegel for Atlas Air. Let me direct my first comments to the statute of limitations argument Mr. Gleeson just made. … Judge Forrest correctly relied on it to find that there was a process that was going on for a nine-month period.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Timothy Sizemore
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2024
The district court found this to be an aggravating factor that compelled the court to a guideline sentence and imposed an incarceration period of 26 months and a two-year period of supervised release. … one stray comment.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Daniel McIntosh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2016
Would you mind commenting on that, just sort of fundamental justice of what went on below? … His testimony about whether he's testimony was he was clean, completely clean, but had done marijuana once three weeks ago. If that's the case, then it should not have.
45 min of audioOral argument — Vorchheimer v. The Philadelphia Owners Association
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2018
She can't stand for even short periods of time, so she requires the use of a walker. … It hasn't gone through notice and comment. It doesn't get Chevron deference. It gets Skidmore deference. Correct. I don't see anything in there that parses the statute.
38 min of audioOral argument — Ernesto Martinez v. Charles Ryan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019
And I thought I would at least comment briefly on, I think, what the implications of Sprites are for Mr. Martinez's case. Judge McKeon Let me speak for myself only. … And he then filed something called a ruling saying that my request to have further comments about our discussion memorialized somehow was denied.
53 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014
The air is locked into place at that point. … In a real clean case, that statement of loss is very easy to apply.
40 min of audioOral argument — Knous v. Broadridge Fin Solutions, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021
Creed, I want to follow up on Judge Kayada's comments. Seems to me your reading of the statute is directly contrary to what the legislature was intending to accomplish. … We are going to pay you your salary and your vacation pay through that time period.
22 min of audioOral argument — In Interest of H.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2012
Before I launch into my argument here, I do want to throw one cautionary comment out. … Courts have – the Juvenile Courts Act and the Adoption Act allow for the admission of DCFS reports by way of judicial notice. That's exactly what happened in this case. There was no objection to it.
48 min of audioOral argument — Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2019
To use the Supreme Court's language from Toomey, it's, would there be any temptation to not hold the line of justice neat, clean, and true? … Certainly in the pre-Spath period, not that much was actually about evidence. The evidentiary rulings ended up – were more pertinent in the 2015, 16, 17 period.
66 min of audioOral argument — Bimbov.Botticella
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2010
Botticella had acted improperly does not justify the broad injunction of the district. Let me ask you this question. … In Baccarat, it was a rating case, and the Court really commented extensively about how these were honorable men who hadn't done anything wrong.
39 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.