Documents

Oral argument — Leif Halversen v. Raandy White

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

And Buck as well, it was a longer time period when they raised it than the time period in this case. In this case, it was four days. I'm not sure which way that cuts. … She helps clean the house. She helps clean the van. She cleans their clothes. She does a ton of things to assist in this crime.

Oral argument — Grossvs German Foundation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

This one, I think, there's clean jurisdiction. This one, no amount of prayer will make the jurisdiction go away. … And with respect to Judge Stapleton, he wasn't right when he made his offhand comment from the bench.

Oral argument — FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2019

And that went on for a period of time. Well, maybe I can ‑‑ Did it go on for a period of time? Is there a yes or no in your vocabulary? Yes. It did go on for a time. … They were simply tanker rail cars that FMC deemed too dangerous to clean out, so they just dumped them and sent them down into the hole.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Yankey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2022

So he had 40 hours of treatment sometime in that time period, but no treatment once he was released. … And referencing the fact that he had the tools was only in reference to a comment that Mr.

Oral argument — Evergreen Square, L.L.C. v. City of Tupelo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

That's not a discharge, which is a term of art under the Clean Water Act. That's not a discharge within the meaning of the Clean Water Act. … A discharge in the Clean Water Act is a discharge in the navigable waterways.

Oral argument — United States v. Business Recovery Services LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2012

What is the evidence of the purpose of the Telemarketing Recovery Act? Do we have any legislative history here? … The regulation itself has – the exemption has – itself has an exemption for retail sales of non-durable office or cleaning supplies.

Oral argument — United States v. Doren Ward

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

Maybe you could start by just shedding that light that we're all looking for, that just here's the clean line that shows that this is on the side of variance as opposed to constructive amendment. … The judge instructs that you can – either Clean Air Act violation would amount to a – I'm sorry, either a violation of the work practice standard would be a Clean Air Act violation.

Oral argument — The Centech Group v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008

It says the contract may not be awarded, period. Doesn't that control? … Now, there was no question about this all the way throughout the period of proposal evaluations. No one questioned CENTEC's intent and capability to comply.

Oral argument — John Schroeder v. Jeff Premo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Cummins was the cleaning lady. There was a delay of eight months. The Supreme Court has said in Neal that a delay of seven months is a severely hamper, severely troubling to the court. … And in that case, if, if the pre-trial publicity is so extensive, and this is the Rudeau case, it's a 20 minute confession aired repeatedly.

Oral argument — People v. Irwin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2017

Armand, A-R-M-A-N, that mug shot evidence tending to inform the jury of a defendant's commission of other unrelated criminal acts should not be admitted? … When appealed, the state incorrectly argues that this is subject to some sort of invited air doctrine. There was no improper argument by trial counsel. Thus, invited air does not apply.

Oral argument — United States v. Del Evans, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2026

And we would prefer that it be prosecuted here instead of under the Hobbs Act. Was there any history on why that was? The preference for the bank robbery? … First of all, if you're feeling that way, I'm going to push you back to the clean air standard that you've articulated, the harmless air standard. Same result regardless.

Oral argument — Akiak Native Community v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

Citizens enforcing Clean Water Act requirements in a permitting decision have no financial stake in the case, but they do have a very strong interest in protecting clean water. … And the Clean Water Act has a higher standard for allowing people to get into court because citizens were meant to help supplement the government's ability to enforce the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Renee Stringer v. Town of Jonesboro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2020

Technically, if you set, if you set the Clean Water Act and Halloween. I'm sorry. Nothing, I'm sorry. I'm just, I'm being mean. … It's not enforcing the Clean Water Act. So whatever LDH has been doing doesn't preclude this citizen suit from proceeding.

Oral argument — Edwards v. CSX Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2016

And that is they would have the defense of sole proximate cause as a defense to a locomotive inspection act violation. … So we asked for reconsideration on that basis, and reconsideration was denied without comment.

Oral argument — United States v. Larry Kelly, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2017

I know, but the comments approvingly cite that First Circuit decision. That seems hard to reconcile with the statement that it's a per se error. … The intrusion in that case, the alternate acted as the foreman to verdict before the alternate was dismissed. The intrusion in this case is clearly factually much less than in Acevedo.

Oral argument — In re K.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2015

When those are the comments that I get, after a clean bill of health, after, once again, everybody coming into court and saying, this guy's done everything he can possibly do, that's the troubling aspect … So I do not know whether he would be considered unfit under the Adoption Act.

Oral argument — United Fire & Casualty Company v. Titan Contractors Service, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2014

And I'm thinking of a cleaning business, which is basically what they are. Practically everything they use, every one of their cleaning products is probably an irritant. … But xylene is classified as a pollutant under the Clean Air Act, isn't it?

Oral argument — Combs v. Schmidt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2014

Jackson says they looked at the hospital's retention of medical records beyond the statutory time period. … They said, look, the hospital goes beyond the statutory time period in order to preserve medical records. And they go on more.

Oral argument — Monica Quintana v. City of Alexandria

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2017

That's clean. That's not clean here. … The city, based on your comments, is almost getting punished for A. They're not based on my comments. Well, Judge Wynn, hear me out, please. Judge Wynn, hear me out, please.

Oral argument — Eiselt v. Cahill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2023

And the rules governing the appellate procedure have changed quite a bit during that period of time. But there's a couple of rules that haven't changed. … I'm going to confine my comments today just to the ones that relate to my client, Mid-Century Telephone. When we look at the post-trial motion, I believe Mr.